1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Heaven populated w/out the cross?

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by Luke2427, Jan 26, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    None of these verses have ANYTHING at all to do with original sin. The point is that just because Jeffry Dalmer was a cannibal freak does not mean that his son has to pay for his cannibalism.

    It has NOTHING AT ALL to do with the fact that all sin in Adam- nothing at all.
     
  2. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28
    The point I was trying to make is this; in regards to Enoch and Elijah, when they left this earth, they went without their natural body being buried.
    Enoch was translated out of here!!

    Gen.5:23 And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five years:

    24 And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.


    Hebrews 11:5 By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death;and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.

    Greek word used for translated in Heb. 11:5 methistēmi
    1) to transpose, transfer, remove from one place to another

    a) of change of situation or place

    b) to remove from the office of a steward

    c) to depart from life, to die


    Now when Elijah left, he left in a chariot of fire and a whirlwind, being alongside Elisha at the moment of his departure.

    2 Kings 2:1 And it came to pass, when the LORD would take up Elijah into heaven by a whirlwind, that Elijah went with Elisha from Gilgal.

    2Ki.2:11 And it came to pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire, and parted them both asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven.

    12 And Elisha saw it, and he cried, My father, my father, the chariot of Israel, and the horsemen thereof. And he saw him no more: and he took hold of his own clothes, and rent them in two pieces.

    So you see, Sister Ann, they went to heaven, and apparently their bodies were never laid in the ground, like the other OT saints....or at least it looks that way to me.

    Their souls are "not guilty" because they(their souls) haven't committed even one sin. To be a sinner, once must have sinned. Babies have not sinned as you DoG's claim they have. The death sentence pronounced on us is in reference to our "outer man", and it will die, whether we be saint or sinner. Now once God imputes sin unto us, then we die spiritually(seperated from God) and need of saving.

    Rom. 7:8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.

    9 For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, [/B]and I died.Paul plainly states here that he was alive once without the law. If he was alive, then he died, do you advocate a "fall from grace"?? I sure don't. We are born alive unto Him, and once He SHOWS US we are sinners in need of saving, then we die unto Him.

    10 And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.

    11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.I will ask this question again, how can you "slew" something that is already dead???

    Rom. 4:15 Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, [/U]there is no transgression.[/U]



    Matt. 17:10 And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias must first come?

    11 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.

    12 But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them.

    13Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.

    I take this to mean that the "soul/spirit" of Elijah came back in John the Baptist. I could be wrong on this, however.....

    I never said they went "without" Jesus' death, but they went "before" He actually died on the cross. They died in faith, looking towards the cross, whereas, we look back at the cross. I just stated that I BELIEVE that they (Enoch and Elijah) natural bodies were never buried. Moses, Aaron, Elisha, Jacob, Caleb, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David, Solomon, Noah, all of these OT saints died and were buried, with Moses being buried by God Himself. According to the scriptures, it looks like Enoch and Elijah's natural body was not laid in a grave. I do believe their natural body was changed to a spiritual body when they left because no flesh will glory in His prescense.

    I hope I have cleared this up!!

    i am I am's!!

    Willis
     
    #82 convicted1, Jan 27, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 27, 2011
  3. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It has another god besides the LORD—its self.


    It's Michelangelo's Moses.
     
  4. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Your position is heretical, not orthodox. Sinners saved in any manner by grace through faith is anathema. Clearly someone doesn't know enough about the subject, alright.
     
  5. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Since I agree they are corrupt from conception, I guess what you believe is unscriptural, pagan claptrap.
     
  6. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Save me from your "very little training" education hoopla. It is apparent from your positions, including you hyper un-orthodox heresy agnostic type mysterious salvation you are not as educated as you think you are and have no business ever questioning the orthodoxy of others. Name one person or one commentary pre-Augustine that believed what he did or baptized a baby, which when taken to it's logical conclusion (one of your favorite pet phrases) makes it necessary.
     
  7. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    No, you just lack the theological comprehension to know otherwise.
     
  8. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    Here genius:

     
  9. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Here's a real gem from Calvin's The Secret Providence of God:

     
  10. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    "infant baptism is assumed in Irenaeus’ writings" http://www.catholic.com/library/Early_Teachings_of_Infant_Baptism.asp

    ...and...

    "The Church received from the apostles the tradition of giving baptism even to infants. The apostles, to whom were committed the secrets of the divine sacraments, knew there are in everyone innate strains of [original] sin, which must be washed away through water and the Spirit" (Commentaries on Romans 5:9 [A.D. 248]).

    I guess you believe Christ's 12 apostle really did baptize infants like Roman Catholics believe, and passed on to the Roman Catholic church that regeneration occurs by the Spirit through baptism, and passed that on to Origen? He was a liar, and if you cannot see this...please don't speak on comprehension. You will really appeal to Roman Catholics as orthodox? Strike that...if you believe in another way of salvation in the same manner they do, I guess you would.
     
    #90 webdog, Jan 27, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 27, 2011
  11. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    At least he's consistent. As disgusting as that is, it's the logical conclusion to the whole system of Calvinism.
     
  12. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    It doesn't matter WEBDOG. you said show you... I showed you.

    I never thought that would be enough. I know you too well.
     
  13. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    I do not personally figure that infants go to hell.

    But you calling his comments "disgusting" betrays a terrible flaw in your philosophy.

    You think God must meet your standards of right and wrong.

    You think God is not worthy if he doesn't line up with what YOU judge to be good and evil.

    God does not answer to you.

    And if, in fact, he DOES send babies to hell for some perfect reason that you are not aware of- you are going to have a bad day answering for these comments on judgment day.
     
  14. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    No. I think God must meet His standards. Infant damnation is not one of them.
     
  15. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    Based on...???
     
  16. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    God's word. I and many others have posted much scripture for this. I'm not going to repeat myself. You can also read Al Mohler's opinion on this, plus Charles Spurgeon and many others. They will have scripture references you can check for yourself.
     
  17. freeatlast

    freeatlast New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amy a quick question. What standards are you refering to?
     
  18. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    Righteousness and justice.
     
  19. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    It is MY opinion as well, Amy, that babies do not go to hell- but that is what it is- OPINION- not doctrine.

    You do NOT have any Word from God that says God would be a monster to send babies to hell.

    If he so chose, it is his prerogative. That is what irks you- that God can do as he pleases and what you think he ought to do does not matter to him one iota. He doesn't run it by you to see if you think it is "disgusting" or not.
     
  20. pinoybaptist

    pinoybaptist Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    8,136
    Likes Received:
    3
    Faith:
    Baptist

    Waiting for an answer, Mr. Lawson.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...