1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Historical Proofs for KJVOnlyism

Discussion in '2003 Archive' started by Scott J, Feb 12, 2003.

  1. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    KING JAMES AV 1611 said:

    I have proved the KJV

    Good for you!

    [​IMG]

    You've definitely shown progress. We should be able to let you write in ink soon.
     
  2. Steve K.

    Steve K. Guest

    the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them that believe not... hmm just thinking.
    The KJV is the word of God!
     
  3. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Where does it say in the Greek and Hebrew that the KJV is the word of God?
     
  4. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    KING JAMES AV 1611 said:

    the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them that believe not...

    Yeah, and when Jesus said that he was thinking of KJV-onlyism.

    Pull the other one!
     
  5. Steve K.

    Steve K. Guest

    YAWN I have to go re arrange my socks.I'm sure to learn more there than from you guy's.
     
  6. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    YAWN I have to go re arrange my socks.I'm sure to learn more there than from you guy's.

    I would believe that without hesitation. [​IMG]
     
  7. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Only becuase you don't listen when people tell you the truth.
     
  8. Steve K.

    Steve K. Guest

    Coming from a guy"larry" who teaches that the book of Hebrews is doctrinal for the church age.HA HA huh hawhawyuhaaaaaaa. Please!
     
  9. BrianT

    BrianT New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,516
    Likes Received:
    0
  10. Steve K.

    Steve K. Guest

    I'll accept that as the smartest thing you have said in a while Brian.
     
  11. BrianT

    BrianT New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,516
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's nice. I'm still waiting for one from you. [​IMG]
     
  12. Steve K.

    Steve K. Guest

    1. God promised to preserve His words (Psa. 12:6-7; Mat. 24:35). There has to be a preserved copy of God's pure words somewhere. If it isn't the KJV, then what is it?

    2. It has no copyright. The text of the KJV may be reproduced by anyone for there is no copyright forbidding it's duplication. This is not true with the modern perversions.

    3. The KJV produces good fruit (Mat. 7:17-20). No modern translation can compare to the KJV when it comes to producing good fruit. For nearly four hundred years, God has used the preaching and teaching of the KJV to bring hundreds of millions to Christ. Laodicean Christians might favor the new versions, but the Holy Spirit doesn't.

    4. The KJV was translated during the Philadelphia church period (Rev. 3:7-13). The modern versions begin to appear rather late on the scene as the lukewarm Laodicean period gets underway (Rev. 3:14-22), but the KJV was produced way back in 1611, just in time for the many great revivals (1700-1900). The Philadelphia church was the only church that did not receive a rebuke from the Lord Jesus Christ, and it was the only church that "kept" God's word (Rev. 3:8).

    5. The KJV translators were honest in their work. When the translators had to add certain words, largely due to idiom changes, they placed the added words in italics so we'd know the difference. This is not the case with many new translations.

    6. All new translations compare themselves to the KJV. Isn't it strange that the new versions never compare themselves to one another? For some strange reason they all line up against one Book--the A.V. 1611. I wonder why? Try Matthew 12:26.

    7. The KJV translators believed they were handling the very words of God (I Ths. 2:13). Just read the King James Dedicatory and compare it to the prefaces in the modern versions. Immediately, you will see a world of difference in the approach and attitude of the translators. Which group would YOU pick for translating a book?

    8. The KJV is supported by far more evidence. Of over 5,300 pieces of manuscript evidence, ninety-five percent supports the King James Bible! The changes in the new versions are based on the remaining five percent of manuscripts, most of which are from Alexandria, Egypt. (There are only two lines of Bibles: the Devil's line from Alexandria, and the Lord's line from Antioch. We'll deal with this later.)

    9. No one has ever proven that the KJV is not God's word. The 1611 should be considered innocent until proven guilty with a significant amount of genuine manuscript evidence.

    10. The KJV exalts the Lord Jesus Christ. The true scriptures should testify of Jesus Christ (John 5:39). There is no book on this planet which exalts Christ higher than the King James Bible. In numerous places the new perversions attack the Deity of Christ, the Blood Atonement, the Resurrection, salvation by grace through faith, and the Second Coming. The true scriptures will TESTIFY of Jesus Christ, not ATTACK Him!
     
  13. BrianT

    BrianT New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,516
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] You just don't get it, do you.
     
  14. Steve K.

    Steve K. Guest

    I have the true word of God the KJV. What more could I want?
     
  15. BrianT

    BrianT New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,516
    Likes Received:
    0
    The ability to properly understand it?
     
  16. Steve K.

    Steve K. Guest

    Got that too it's called the HOLY SPIRIT not MV.
     
  17. Terry_Herrington

    Terry_Herrington New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,455
    Likes Received:
    1
    Steve,
    Why is Hebrews not for the church?
     
  18. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    How sad but telling that you would attribute what you post here to the Holy Spirit. The spirit that led you to believe KJVOnlyism was not the Holy Spirit Steve. If it were, you could prove it by scripture without twisting scripture.
     
  19. Steve K.

    Steve K. Guest

    Scriptural proof; Prove all things hold fast to that which is good. I have proved MV's not good and KJV to be the word of God. Therefore I hold to the KJV.
     
Loading...