Historical timelines with inaccurate calanders

I`ve tried to research the Julian and Gregorian calanders. My interest was sparked when I saw something about a group of Russian mathematicians researching the ancient timelines. They discovered records, that were duplicated and outright fabricated. In the end, they determined there have been less than 1,000 years since the birth of Jesus. I won`t go that far.

The Julian calander was based on a 365.25 day year. It`s accually 365.2422 days. That`s a margin of error every 1,000 years. The Gregorian calander reduced the margin of error to within 1/10,000 of a day per year. The date was ordered advanced 11 days to bring the calander date in line with year one. The British and Protestant Germany didn`t accept the Pope`s calander until about 1700 AD.

The pegan holidays revolved around the Spring equinox and the Winter Solstice. The Spring equinox and Winter Solstice don`t match up with the dates of the pegan holidays. They`re out of line (based on Europe) by 4 days. That means Pope Gregory`s people miscalculated by better than 500 years. It means an abbot was off by better than 500 years, when he declared what Roman year Jesus was born in.

There`s also the discrepancy between the Gregorian and Jewish calander years. According to Jewish records, the period between the Second Jewish Rebellion (trad. dated at 135 AD) and Constantine never existed. According to Jewish records, there was no more than 100 years between the crucifiction of Jesus and Constantine.

According to I Kings 6:1, there was 480 years between the Exodus and Solomon. The Pharoah, that captured Jerusalem during the reign of Rehaboam, was Sheshak. The k is supposedly to express an opinion (destroyer). The name is accually Shesha. Since there aren`t any vowels in Hebrew, it`s Sh`sh. The double s sound is short for Ramses. That makes Seti I contemporary with Solomon`s Golden Empire. Hieroglyphics on the wall of Ramses, and a picture of a city falling without a fight, support the identification.

These corrections bring the date of the Exodus in line with archeology. It also greatly effects Landmarkism. Records from the Glastonbury abby (Somerset, England) state there`s been a structure on those grounds since 166 AD. Jewish records place that within the time of Constantine. Evidance has been found of a cataclysm by studying tree rings. The date 542 AD has been determined by counting the tree rings. That`s the date for the beginning of the "Dark Ages".

According to the records at the Glastonbury abby ruins, there was an established church, with a permanent place of worship, in Glastonbury a little more than 100 years after the crucifiction of Jesus. The Jewish timeline places the Paulicians in Armenia a little more 300 years after the crucifiction.

Bob

 

rsr:

Thanks for the link. The idea of Constantine coming within 100 years of the crucifiction is the Jewish chronology.

Bob

 

Shammai & Matt:

The Egyptian dating methods provide some interesting points.

Bob

 

Paul:

They counted tree rings to establish a cataclysm, that resulted in the "Dark Ages". The problem is, that it only establishes a cataclysm that many years ago. It doesn`t establish the cataclysm in relation to historical timelines. Sediment layers have been shuffled up. There`s the old story about a group of scientists going down layer by layer, dating things back thousands of years. All at once, they reached a Johnson outbourd engine. A strict sedimentary timeline depends on no cataclysms.

Artifacts could`ve fallen together, then seperated by a cataclysm. Weight means nothing during a cataclysm. Hurricane Charlie pulled oak trees 5-6 ft. in diameter out of the ground the same and threw them the same as children`s toys.

Bob