Featured 'I Didn't Join to Be Sacrificed': U.S. Troops Fed Up with Risky Afghanistan Strategy

Poncho, Sometimes you get so involved in spinning your wheels you can't see the truth!

 

This doesn't answer my question.

 

With reasoning like this, you ought to be a CNN commentator.

 

I'd prefer that to being a fascist at Saudi Faux Snews any day.

 

Just as I suspected ... a closet Marxist shill.



You might want to check out the true ownership behind all those "real news" sites you're constantly cut-and-pasting from.

 

I'm beginning to think you have no idea what it means to be a marxist as you exhibit more of the traits of being a marxist than I.

You might want to write an email to Saudi Faux Snews and give them the same advice about checking out who they are actually sourcing before they fill 8 or 9 pages of their archives with stories from a Sunni Muslim anti Assad activist paid by the EU and "another nation" (he lives in England) pretending to be "The Syrian Observatory For Human Rights". I doubt it would make much difference though as he seems to fit perfectly into Fox News and Saudi Arabia's agenda to get the United States involved militarily in Syrian regime change.

 

Bush didn't invade Afghanistan to go after bin Laden. How naive can you be? He invaded Afghanistan to transition to an invasion of Iraq. That was always his real objective. It had nothing to do with 9/11. In fact bush at one point said he was no longer interested in capturing bin Laden. He was simply a pawn in the Neo-Con pursuit of world domination. Try to understand reality.