1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Is it moral to Kill in self-defense?

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by robertguwapito, Mar 1, 2012.

  1. Ed B

    Ed B Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2010
    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is moral and to kill in self defense and to protect family. But we do see examples in the first few centuries of the Church where our brethren chose martyrdom over self-defense.

    I will gladly accept correction here but I don't recall any mention in the history of the first few centuries of the Church where Christian leaders or Christian communities rose up in arms to defend themselves in times of persecution. It seems to me we have the right to defend ourselves but in some cases martyrdom might be a better way. But allowing a criminal to harm or kill you does not in and of itself equal martyrdom. And there is no way I could stand by and watch a family member hurt or killed without defending them, and I am certain I would defend my own life in most circumstances. I hope I would not kill a thief who was only trying to steal my TV. I would try to stop it and be willing to use physical force, but I don’t value a TV over a human life – even the life of a thief.
     
  2. plain_n_simple

    plain_n_simple Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,887
    Likes Received:
    6
    Put another way, how do we overcome evil?

    "And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death."

    Says nothing about killing those who do evil against you.

    In fact, Jesus said to bless your enemies, and to love them, forgive them. This is the greatest command.

    Our warfare is not against flesh and blood.

    Carry the sheild of Faith.

    These teachings are relevant to a true believer and are opposite of killing the man that brings evil upon you.

    These teachings of Jesus are opposite of what the world teaches.

    If you claim Christ and need a gun for protection, how is that any different than the man who walks without Christ and needs a gun? There is no difference no matter how you try to justify it.
     
  3. HAMel

    HAMel Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    2,099
    Likes Received:
    96
    Faith:
    Baptist
    ...some of you folks are really strange.

    Baptist with an Amish upbringing?
     
  4. revmwc

    revmwc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Messages:
    4,139
    Likes Received:
    86
    And yet the Passage in Luke that has been posted says sell your clock and buy a sword. Why would Jesus tell his followers to buy a sword? Peter had a sword and jumped to Jesus aide and Christ told Peter to put it away for it was time, and he healed the mans ear that very night.
    Jesus didn't rebuke Peter for coming to His defense but said that the hour was come.
    So Christ believed the disciples had need of protection on their journey.
     
  5. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    They needed the swords as protection against wild animals.

     
  6. Arbo

    Arbo Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    Just lambs who want to be slaughtered.

    I really am beginning to think that some here have the idea that the sacrifice of themselves and their families to criminals would be noble.
     
  7. Baptist Believer

    Baptist Believer Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    10,720
    Likes Received:
    781
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I certainly believe it is moral to take another's life in self-defense, if necessary, as well as take another's life in defense of another person.

    For instance, if someone is attacking a child with the obvious intent to kidnap, rape, or murder the child, I will do everything within my power to prevent the attacker from doing so, including ending their life.

    Nope. You've just condemned Jesus with this ethic.

    As for myself, I am actually much more likely to take someone else's life on behalf of another person than to preserve my own life. I am not afraid of death, I have faced it several times before, so I am much more likely to try to delay the use of lethal force in preservation of my own life as I am the life of someone else who may not have the assurance of eternal life in Christ.

    I carry a concealed semi-automatic handgun with me wherever I go except where it is not permitted, to give me options in countering a threat. Some people automatically assume my first choice in any difficult situation would be to draw and fire, but that's actually the choice of last resort. Most of the time you can defuse a situation verbally or back off. I'll gladly give someone my wallet and valuables if that will allow me not to physically harm them. However there are situations where it is clear that the bad guy wants to murder, rape, molest and destroy, and cooperating with them only makes it worse and allows them to harm more people. At that point, the handgun comes into play.

    If someone is going to carry a handgun, I strongly recommend tactical firearm training, because Hollywood-style tactics will simply get you (and probably other innocent people) killed.
     
  8. thegospelgeek

    thegospelgeek New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Interesting topic that I have considered many times over the years. No one has ever been able to show me scripture that supports the position of taking a life in order to save my own. I am convinced that the scripture supports valueing another more than my own.

    I am however unsure of the position of defending my family. Should I take the position that my wife is saved and the other lost? Maybe I should but I would not unless God's grace interviened and made me able to do so.
    I often hear Christian people speak of defending their home and posessions, both on this forum and at church, and think that we are missing the boat. Do we REALLY get what Christ taught?
     
  9. Don

    Don Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    11,048
    Likes Received:
    321
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Wow. I gotta tell you, that was weak.

    I read the article you provided; you apparently missed the part where there's a distinction made between "wilderness," farmlands, and towns. Since Jesus had just finished the Passover, and was on His way to the nearby Mount of Olives, He wasn't in a wilderness.

    So that's quite the stretch you're making there. Makes the scripture seem almost elastic.
     
  10. thegospelgeek

    thegospelgeek New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    BaptistBeliever has brought up a point that I didnot address, the violence against another unknown person or a child. In this case, yes I believe taking the life of the asailant is moral.
     
  11. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    I guess those who are against killing in self defense are also against just war? So if the US is b*mbed tomorrow by a terr*rist country, we should just sit back and do nothing?
     
  12. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    God has never said killing in self defense was a sin.
     
  13. Alcott

    Alcott Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    9,404
    Likes Received:
    353
    Faith:
    Baptist
    How do you know that if that is not what Jesus said?

    Besides, the title question of this thread does not differentiate between self-defense in regard to animals or humans.
     
  14. Don

    Don Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    11,048
    Likes Received:
    321
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I would even go so far as to say: how is a "human" attacking you for his/her own personal gain, or to simply cause violence against you, any different from an animal?
     
  15. blackbird

    blackbird Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    11,898
    Likes Received:
    4
    I'd have my best jets doin' "Rubber Band" takeoffs from every carrier I had in the arsonel!!!!!:thumbs:
     
  16. Bobby Hamilton

    Bobby Hamilton New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2010
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Has anyone even mentioned war here? Isn't much of killing done in war done in self defense (yes, I know there is some that isn't).

    God handed out his commandments in the OT, yet he still sent his people out on missions to basically slaughter entire populations to free up the promise land.

    When did this suddenly change? Or did it?

    Or even what Romans 13 says? At least here, our law states that we can kill in self defense or to protect another. Thoughts?
     
  17. jonathan.borland

    jonathan.borland Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    2
    Where in the NT or early church history do we see examples of Christians taking lives for any reason? In fact we only see examples in the opposite direction. But on the other hand we see Paul saying that he who doesn't provide for his family is WORSE than an unbeliever. We're not talking about vigilante justice killing but rather preventing evil from snuffing out your or your wife's or children's lives. That said, I would make effort to incapacitate him without killing him if possible.
     
  18. jonathan.borland

    jonathan.borland Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    2
    There is a paradox here, for we do want to be those who "love not our lived even unto death," but at the same time those who have faith in God and enforce justice (Heb 11:33) when evil wishes to prevail.
     
  19. Tom Bryant

    Tom Bryant Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    4,521
    Likes Received:
    43
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Question for those who don't believe self defense is the right course of action. Do you call the police when you are threatened? Or afterwards do you report the person who robbed you to the police?
     
  20. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    26,913
    Likes Received:
    1,017
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Reply to OP

    Always a little saddened when positions are advocated based on what men say or have reasoned, rather than answering the question of "What does God say in scripture?"

    First we must answer the question does Thou shalt not kill really mean you shall not murder. Thus the killing of plant and animal life for food or protection would be ok.

    Today in America, if you see a bear threatening your children and you shoot it, you can be sentenced for killing a protected animal. If you do not shoot it and the bear harms a child, you can be sentenced for child abuse or reckless endangerment, etc.

    Certainly the Bible authorizes lethal force under the color of government, so soldiers are not murders. And certainly the Bible gives direction that we should protect the innocent.

    OTOH, we are to turn the other cheek, i.e. allow others to disparage us, insult us, and even to bodily harm to us, but to extrapolate this to allow them to kill us or innocents seems ungodly. Much better to act collectively, rather than individually because we should be concerned with the rights of all, not just us and not "them."
     
Loading...