1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is KJV superior to all other translations?

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Logos1560, Dec 10, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    aww, come on Ed, you are one of the only ones besides me that uses the KJV1873 that I know... now you are deserting me for the HCSB?

    I feel lonely now!
     
  2. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    Personally I spend no time picking it apart because it has already been oicked apart much like a cat who kills a bird--feathers going everywhere with a lot of fluff in the air. The AV has already been proven an outdated translation so there is nothing more to pick apart. Picking the AV apart is much like kicking a dead horse--[attack on Bible deleted].
     
    #42 gb93433, Dec 13, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 14, 2006
  3. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    See the bold above. False! On other thread I answered concerning the KJV superiority over modern versions reflecting to right translation of words in the KJV. I compared the KJV and modern versions reflecting to two verses. Look at John 5:31 and 8:14. I found modern versions contradicted with 2 verses. The KJV does not contradict them -- ZERO! The KJV superiority!!!!
     
  4. Jack Matthews

    Jack Matthews New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2006
    Messages:
    833
    Likes Received:
    1
    What manuscript are you using to do your comparison? And which modern version are you referring to? The NRSV translates both of those verses superior to the KJV and doesn't contradict. So do both the NASB and NIV.
     
  5. Mexdeaf

    Mexdeaf New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,051
    Likes Received:
    3
    In my humble opinion this is the most ignorant statement that I have ever read on the BB. To date, anyways.
     
  6. Eliyahu

    Eliyahu Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,957
    Likes Received:
    16
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I don't care about any reproach or condemnation against my statement or my choice as my Lord Jesus didn't!
     
    #46 Eliyahu, Dec 13, 2006
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2006
  7. rbell

    rbell Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    further definition would be helpful:

    by "anti-KJV," do you refer to...
    1. people who like the KJV but prefer a modern version, or

    2. people who truly don't like the KJV?

    The rhetoric here seems mighty harsh...especially if you mean #1.
     
  8. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,285
    Likes Received:
    507
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Obnoxious piety alert. We are talking about a definable issue and Eli swallows a martyr pill AFTER his earlier harsh rebuking of others. Hmmm.

    Bro Bell, harsh rhetoric is normative :p
     
  9. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    I don't know of many anti-KJV people. I am surprised that you have actually met people who are against the KJV. I have quite a wide sphere of Christian friends and associates and only a tiny, tiny segment would be against the KJV.
     
    #49 NaasPreacher (C4K), Dec 14, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 14, 2006
  10. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80

    It appears that both sides in this debate are capable of using opinion as "fact."

    Proven to be outdated??? For an "outdated version" it sure seems to be powerfully used of God in the 21st century!
     
  11. AntennaFarmer

    AntennaFarmer Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    610
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you C4K. Thank you very much indeed. That was well said.

    A.F.
     
  12. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'll give a big AMEN to that too...
    That is a statement that even most MV users could get behind.

    You see folks, no one hates the KJV.. we love it. It is God's word.
     
  13. StefanM

    StefanM Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,333
    Likes Received:
    210
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I am not KJVO. I am not even KJVP. I personally prefer modern translations, and I do preach from modern translations.

    However, I do still read some from the KJV, and I have no problem with those who prefer to do so as long as they don't try to force me to read exclusively from the KJV.
     
  14. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,217
    Likes Received:
    406
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Are you suggesting that a comparison of two verses proves superiority at every rendering of every verse?

    John 5:31 in KJV
    If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.

    Are you providing a verse that seems to contradict Herb Evan's claim that "the KJB superiority over these versions is self evident?"

    According to your reasoning, the verse you cite would seem to suggest that the KJV cannot bear witness of itself.
     
  15. Eliyahu

    Eliyahu Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,957
    Likes Received:
    16
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This is what I wanted to address to, because many people say that they don't hate KJV, but de facto they speak or work against it.
     
  16. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    To say that the KJV is not a perfect translation is not to speak against it.
     
  17. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,217
    Likes Received:
    406
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Very few believers would say anything negative about those who chose the KJV as their Bible and who prefer to read it, and most believers even those who may use modern translations would not agree with them. I still choose the KJV as my overall favorite translation although it may not still be overall the most accurate translation, but that choice would not justify the use of inaccurate claims to defend it. It could possibly be overall the best English translation, but no one has provided the evidence that would prove that opinion to be true. Valid evidence is available that shows that in at least some verses another English translation is clearer, better, and more accurate than the KJV.

    Choice of the KJV as their Bible is a very different choice than choosing to promote a KJV-only theory and choosing to condemn all other English translations. Will those who use invalid means such as inaccurate statements, faulty reasoning, and even false claims and improper tactics such as attacks on the character of other believers in their advocating a KJV-only theory not regret their choices?
     
  18. Keith M

    Keith M New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Those on BB who "speak or work against" the KJV do neither. I think I can speak for those who favor MVs in saying that if someone wants to use the KJV as their personal Bible of choice, that is fine. It is up to the individual.

    Speaking against the KJV would entail calling the KJV garbage or other such blasphemies. Has anyone on BB called the KJV garbage? Of course not!

    Working against the KJV would entail trying to get rid of the KJV altogether so that no one could use it or have access to it. Has anyone on BB stated their desire to make the KJV unavailable to anyone who wants to use it? Again, the answer is no.

    Standing against the KJVO belief is not standing against the KJV itself. Standing against the KJVO belief is standing against a man-made "doctrine" that is based on nothing found in any Bible version.
     
  19. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,285
    Likes Received:
    507
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Well put, Keith.

    Since the AV is my version of choice for memory work but not for preaching/evangelism, I want to treat that translation with respect, but not idolatry. Hence many of us on the BB are FOR the AV, but against the "only" sect.
     
  20. go2church

    go2church Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,304
    Likes Received:
    6
    Faith:
    Baptist
    [Bible attack deleted - such repugnant comments about any version will not be tolerated]]

    Hey I know...bring back the ASV. It has the thee's and thou's that nobody uses anymore, anywhere but is at least a good translation
     
    #60 go2church, Dec 14, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 14, 2006
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...