1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is the Canon closed?

Discussion in 'Free-For-All Archives' started by trying2understand, Feb 25, 2003.

  1. trying2understand

    trying2understand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    As I pointed out and asked earlier, what about the other writings of the Apostles not now included in Scriputre? They would meet your requirements.

    Why not read them and decide for yourself if they are Scripture?
     
  2. Frank

    Frank New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,441
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trying2Understand:
    Specifically, which other writings are you suggesting I read? And, which inspired author are you suggesting I read? HOW DO YOU KNOW ANY WRITING IS INSPIRED? What is your standard? Is your standard objective or subjective ( an opinion).
    Moreover, my answer to your question would be there is no evidence to accept any other writings as they do not meet the divine standard ( objective)for inspiration.
     
  3. trying2understand

    trying2understand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, I am not suggesting that anyone should read them, but am asking why Christians couldn't and then decide individually or as a group whether other writings of the Apostles are/aren't inspired.

    W.Putnam gave two lengthy lists of such writings in another thread.


    I accept as inspired those writings which the Church declared to be inspired, by it's authority from Christ.

    Could you verbalize that standard?
     
  4. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Jewish canon consists of thirtynine books; the Christian consists of sixty-six for Protestants and eighty for Catholics (whose canon includes the Apocrypha, regarded by most as of deuterocanonical status).

    To correct the info, it's 66 for Protestants and 72 for Catholics.
     
  5. dumbox1

    dumbox1 Guest

    John,

    73, but who's counting?

    Mark
     
  6. Doubting Thomas

    Doubting Thomas Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,618
    Likes Received:
    7
    I thought it was 73 also--Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Ecclessiasticus, 1 & 2 Maccabees, and Baruch being the seven extra books.

    (Not that it matters [​IMG] )
     
  7. Frank

    Frank New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,441
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trying2Understand:

    Yes, I can verbalize the standard. The only objective standard for any law is GOD. Only God is capable of setting forth an objective standard for man. It is called Truth. It is his word. John 17:17,John 8:31,32. The word of God is free from any subjectivity. Isaiah 55:8-13. The word of God is pure. I Pet. 1:23. The words of man are corruptible. See the creeds, articles of faith of the ists and isms of religion.

    This objective standard teaches the following:
    1. All truth was promised to the apostles. John 16:13. Paul being the LAST as one being born out of due time. I Cor. 15:8,9. Therefore, the objective standard EXCLUDES ALL MEN who came after Paul and claimed apostleship. In fact those who claimed apostleship outside the objective standard were tried and found Liars. Rev. 2:2.

    2. The objective standard for inspiration and apostleship was the ability to perform biblical miracles. II Cor.12:12; Acts 3;6; 9:40; 20;9,10. Therefore, the objective standard EXCLUDES ALL who cannot perform Biblical miracles.Mark 16:17-20.

    3.The objective standard required the miraculous power be given to others by the laying on of the apostles hands. Acts. 8:17,18;8:12-16.

    4. The objective standard mandated that the performing of the miraculous be for a DIVINE PURPOSE. John 20:30,31.Therefore, this excludes ALL who claim to reveal truth by inspiration.

    5. The obvjective standard PROMISED THE HOLY SPIRIT TO THE APOSTLES AND GENTILES OF THE FIRST CENTURY. Luke 24:44-51, Acts 2:14,17;10:44;8:18.

    6. The objective standard proclaims that the miraculous abitlity was to cease. Eph. 4:12-16. This was to end upon the completion of that which is perfect. I Cor. 13:8-13. Therefore, this EXCLUDES ALL who claiim to proclaim and write by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Jude 3,Acts 20:27,Rev. 22:18,19.

    7. The word of God requires one under the miraculous influence to confirm his message and office by the miraculous power of the Holy Spirit. II Cor. 12:12. If one has what they had, he can do what they did. As of this writing, no one has met the OBJECTIVE STANDARD OF GOD FOR INSPIRATION.
     
  8. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Frank said
    I have provided the evidence that revelation ceased after the death of the apostles. John 16:13


    John 16 says nothing about the death of the apostoles

    Frank adds
    , Luke 24;44-51, Acts 2:1-4;8:17,18, Mark 16:17-20, ICor. 13:8-13, Eph. 4;12-16.


    None of these texts mention the death of the Apostles.

    You simply made that up.

    Fra
    nk adds
    If men today are inspired, then they should have the same credentials of inspiration. II Cor. 12:12.


    1Cor 12 give the list of the gifts of the Holy Spirit - not 2Cor 12.

    Neither of them state that after the apostles are all dead the Gifts of the Holy Spirit can not be given.

    In a devastating way - 1 Cor 12 points out that there is MORE than the ONE Gift "Apostle" so using 2Cor 12:12 (as if ALL have to be Apostles) does not work. 1 Cor 12 declares that ALL DO NOT have the SAME gifts.

    Your interpretation did not even work when the discisples WERE alive -

    Frank said
    Furthermore, if the credentials are not the same for men who are inspired today, who changed the requirements and how do we know this to be the case.


    You only listed the requirement of an Apostle - you did not show that to have ANY of the gifts in 1Cor 12 you must FIRSt be an Apostle.

    Furthermore - we have many examples (David for Example) of an inspired author that DID NOT raise the dead, heal the sick etc.

    Frank said
    Bob, all you have to do to prove me wrong is to find one inspired man to raise someone from the dead, make the blind see, the lame walk. If he has what the apostles had; he can do what they did.


    David
    Solomon
    Malachi
    Nahum
    Agabus
    The daughters of Philip

    All of them are inspired authors, or prophets that DID NOT heal the sick, raise the dead etc etc.

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
  9. Frank

    Frank New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,441
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bob:
    The Bible teaches by IMPLICATION the miraculous power ceased when the time of the apostles ceased.
    Consider the following:
    1. The Holy Spirit was Promised to the APOSTLES. John 14:16;15:26:16:13,Luke 24:44-51. This was as per Joel 2:28, Acts 2:17.
    2. The Holy Spirit was to be given to the Gentiles
    as per Joel 2:28. It was Acts 10:44.
    3. The METHOD OF GIVING THE MIRACULOUS GIFTS was through the LAYING ON OF THE APOTLES HANDS. Acts 8:18. If there was another way to receive the miraculous power, SIMON would not have had to offer to buy it. Furthermore, as per acts 8: 20,21 it was not intended for others to be able to give it to someone else. Notice he had no part or lot in this matter.
    4. The divine purpose of the Holy Spirit was to guide the apostles in ALL TRUTH. The Holy Spirit
    did so by his word. Hebrews 4;12, Eph. 6:17, 20:27, Jude 3, Rev. 22:18,19.
    5. The miraculous power of the Holy Spirit was NOT TO CONTNUE FOREVER IT WAS TO CEASE. I Cor. 13:8-11.
    The method of giving the power of the Holy Spirit was provided by the laying on of the apostles hands. Unless there is a 2,000 year old apostle alive, this ability has ceased. Since the method has ceased, then the necessary implication is the miraculous operation has ceased. If not,why not?

    This is called IMPLICATION OF SCRIPTURE. This is one of three ways all language communicates.

    Bob, if you know someone who speaks by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, I offer you and him this challenge. Produce a Biblical miracle like the aposltes did and I will believe modern day revelation is spoken by men today. After all, if he has what they had; he can do what they did!!! Mark 16:17-20, Acts 3:6;9:44;20:11;28:3-6.

    I have made this challenge to produce the credentials of inspiration on many occasions, as of this writing, NO One claiming inspiration has met the objective standard of God in his matter. Therefore, I must conclude they are liars. Rev. 2:2.
     
  10. Frank

    Frank New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,441
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bob:
    As for those on your list, none were promised ALL TRUTH. The miraculous power of the first century was for the divine purpose of completing the revelation of God to man. It was a specific promise to a specific group of people. Those on your list were not promised the miraculous intervention of the Holy Spirit to reveal all truth. SEE John 14:16,15:26;16:13,Luke 24:44-51, Acts 2:1-4,17.
    The Old Testament prophets did perform miralces. SEE II Kings 2:14,I Kings 17:20,21. Solomon. II Chronicles 7:1.
    Furthermore, in order to prove authenticity in the old testament the prohesy had to come true. Deut. 18. David was confirmed as God's spokesmen by being annointed by the power of the prophet who posssed the prophetic ability. The prophet Samuel annointed David and the Spirit of the Lord came upon him. I Sam. 16:13. It is worthy to note that those who witnessed David's victory over the Philistine giant believed the Spirit of God was upon David. The victory over the Philistine was proof God was working through David. We are not given any details as to the proof of the propheises of Agabus or Philip's daughters, except,in the case of Agabus, his utterance did come true. Acts 11:28;21:10,11. Paul was taken prisoner at Jerusalem. 26:28-30. Agabus signified these things by the Spirit. We are simply not told what the sign was. Whatever the proof was, it has nothing to do with the proof of inspiration for those who DID write by the power of God. Their writings are still incontrovertibly inspired of God.
    Now, what is the proof of inspiration for those who claim to speak by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit today?
     
  11. trying2understand

    trying2understand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Granting all of the above, what then about other writings by the Apostles not included in the Canon as you accept it?

    How exactly do they not meet the standard?

    If they meet all of the above standard, why are they not included in the Canon?
     
  12. Frank

    Frank New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,441
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trying2understand:
    They do not meet numbers one through seven as per my previous post. Therefore, I reject any writing as inspired that does not meet the litmus of the New Testament for inspiration. Moreover, I would like to know why I should accept them as inspired?
     
  13. trying2understand

    trying2understand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    If they were written by an APOSTLE how do they not meet the seven standards?
     
  14. Frank

    Frank New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,441
    Likes Received:
    0
    T2U:
    Specifically, for whom and what book are you contending?
     
  15. trying2understand

    trying2understand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    No specific writing. W Putnam listed two very lengthy lists of writings on another thread. Many of them supposedely written by one of the Apostles.

    Of those written by one of the Apsotles, why would they not be inspired?

    What person or persons decided which of the Apostles writings are inspired?

    Without being able to answer those questions, why would anyone accept the Bible as they currently know it?

    It's one thing to say that Scripture is God breathed and all that, but it is entirely different to say what exactly is/is not Scripture.
     
  16. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    The canon, as we have it now, was determined by men who used given standards. If those same standards could be applied to a new document, I see no reason why it could not be included. Odds of meeting those same standards are virtually impossible given the time span.

    The men who determined the canon were theologians and no more. They did not possess extra inspiration from God, but they did establish very rigid standards in determining what was to be accepted and what to be rejected.

    This is not to say that the scriptures in our possession are not sufficient to give us our understanding of God, salvation and other important doctrines.

    Adding a modern theolgians writings? No.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  17. trying2understand

    trying2understand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Any idea of what men?

    And by what authority?
     
  18. Carson Weber

    Carson Weber <img src="http://www.boerne.com/temp/bb_pic2.jpg">

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    3,079
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Jim,

    You wrote, "The men who determined the canon were theologians and no more. They did not possess extra inspiration from God, but they did establish very rigid standards in determining what was to be accepted and what to be rejected."

    If the men who determined the canon were nothing more than theologians apart from any infallible guidance of the Holy Spirit, would you concede that the canon, as it stands today, is a fallible list?

    This would mean that when you quote from the New Testament, you may very well be quoting from an uninspired text that is in error.
     
  19. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trying,,,,,,,,Any idea of what men?

    And by what authority?
    _____________________________________

    You are virtually asking me to write a church history text here. Any good church history book will give you these details. I am not being facetious on this point, but it is a fact.

    Here is the reference to an excellent book on the subject: http://www.gospelcom.net/cgi-ivpress/book.pl/code=1258

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  20. trying2understand

    trying2understand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks, Jim. As many times as I have asked those questions, I have never received a simple lay person's explanation.

    I can identify the Councils that defined the Canon and can tell you when and where they met.

    I can identify the Scriptures which tell us that Christ gave authority to the Church.

    That is why I accept the Canon as defined by the Catholic church.

    What I do not understand is why anyone would accept any particular Bible without being able to articulate those details.

    The various explanations that I have heard have been, "because it is Scripture", "the church just sort of spontaneously recognized Scripture", and "God decided, not man".

    Those really aren't answers in my opinion.
     
Loading...