1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Isaiah 14:12

Discussion in '2000-02 Archive' started by bro. coley, Jul 25, 2002.

  1. bro. coley

    bro. coley New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    61
    Ratings:
    +0
    who is it in the niv? how about the KJV?
     
  2. Farmer's Wife

    Farmer's Wife New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Messages:
    308
    Ratings:
    +0
    Bro. Coley!!! Oh my!!! :eek: :eek: :eek: There is a church near me that is call "Morning Star Baptist Church"! :eek: According to the NIV those people are satanists! :eek:
     
  3. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Ratings:
    +0
    You may find doing a search helpful, because we hash this out every so often
     
  4. bro. coley

    bro. coley New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    61
    Ratings:
    +0
    or maybe they just dont believe the book.
     
  5. bro. coley

    bro. coley New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    61
    Ratings:
    +0
    sorry i didnt realize i was opening an old can of worms.
     
  6. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Ratings:
    +0
    Who doesn't believe what book?
     
  7. bro. coley

    bro. coley New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    61
    Ratings:
    +0
    Bible correcters dont believe the book ,t-h-e k-i-n-g-J-a-m-e-s- b-i-b-l-e .GODS WORD. :rolleyes:
     
  8. GrannyGumbo

    GrannyGumbo <img src ="/Granny.gif">

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    11,414
    Ratings:
    +0
    Even so, Lord Jesus, come quickly!!! [​IMG] HURRY!
     
  9. doug44

    doug44 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2002
    Messages:
    90
    Ratings:
    +0
    this thread was starting to remind me [​IMG] of the old abbott and costello routine "who's on first"? sorry just a thought i'd throw a light moment into the fray....
     
  10. BrianT

    BrianT New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,516
    Ratings:
    +0
    "Lucifer" is the old English, and Latin (from the Vulgate) term for Venus, the morning star. The Hebrew is "helel ben shahar" (Helel son of Shahar), and in Babylonian religion (see verse 4, this is to the king of Babylon), Helel was a god, personified in Venus the morning star. Shahar was his father, the god of the morning (or dawn).

    Scads more could be written (marginal notes from 1611 KJV and prior Bibles, lexicon information, Vulgate information, etc.) but that sums it up.

    The NIV's reading is right. The KJV's reading is right. The Hebrew is right. It is your interpretation that is wrong.

    [ July 25, 2002, 05:06 PM: Message edited by: BrianT ]
     
  11. bro. coley

    bro. coley New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    61
    Ratings:
    +0
    boy! no wonder so many every day christian folks are confused. if we could just find the auther of that. :( :( :( :(
     
  12. DocCas

    DocCas New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,103
    Ratings:
    +0
    What we must also understand is "Haylel" is a Masculine Absolute in the Hebrew. Masculine Absolutes are almost always translated as proper names. This is made clear hundreds of times in the OT. A word with a common meaning, such as "opened" (Yepheth) is translated "Japheth" when in the Masculine Absolute.

    I believe the KJV is more accurate than the NIV at this point due to the KJV translating it as a proper name. If the NIV would capitalize the phrase as a proper name I would have no problem with the translation. After all, the morning star, Venus, proclaims a "false dawn" prior to the true dawn, just as Satan spreads a false light prior to the coming of the Light of the world. [​IMG]
     
  13. BrianT

    BrianT New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,516
    Ratings:
    +0
    I prefer the NIV's reading, because the meaning is more evident as most interpret "Lucifer" as a name for Satan rather than what it used to mean: the morning star, Venus. In other words, it is easier to misinterpret the KJV here.
     
  14. DocCas

    DocCas New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,103
    Ratings:
    +0
    So do you advocate translating any other proper names as if they were mere nouns/verbs? If so, which ones and what criteria do you use to decide which proper name to translate as such and which proper name would you not translate as such?
     
  15. BrianT

    BrianT New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,516
    Ratings:
    +0
    It is clear from the context that someone is being addressed. "You" appears 3 times in the verse, so I don't think anyone's going to think that a "mere noun" appears here, even thought it is not capitalized. All I'm saying is that in my opinion, "morning star" (even if rendered lower-case) in today's language is a better translation choice than "Lucifer". In this case, the term is both a name and a "mere noun" at the same time, for the god Helel was the morning star.
     
  16. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Ratings:
    +0
    I don't know. Only Bible-correctors I know are some KJVOs. Now, back to the topic....
     
  17. DocCas

    DocCas New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,103
    Ratings:
    +0
    I can't help but notice you capitalized the word "He(y)lel." :D
     
  18. BrianT

    BrianT New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,516
    Ratings:
    +0
    I can't help but notice you capitalized the word "He(y)lel." :D </font>[/QUOTE]Yes, because, like I said, the term is both a name (Helel) and a "mere noun" (morning star) at the same time. When referencing by name, capitalize. When referencing as a mere noun, the need isn't there. Just like the next Babylonian god in the verse, which is both a name (Shahar) and a "mere noun" (morning or dawn).
     
  19. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    16,310
    Ratings:
    +1,299
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I don't have the NIV on this PC, how does the NIV translate Revelation 22:16?

    KJV Revelation 22:16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.

    HankD
     
  20. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Ratings:
    +0
    Good idea. I had the same thoughts.
    "I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star." Hank, hope that helps.
     
Loading...