1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Jesus walking over the sea

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Goinheix, Aug 5, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Baptist boy

    Baptist boy New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes Jesus did literaly walk on water but I think there is a deeper meaning like how it was storming and the disciples were probably afriad of the sea and here comes Jesus walking over the very thing they are afriad of telling them not to be afriad and they actually didn't know it was him at first. It shows how that during bad times Jesus will come having complete control over the situation and most of the time we ma not even know it's him coming to help us.
     
  2. freeatlast

    freeatlast New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Goinheix
    If the Lord was on dry land or even standing in shallow water then I suppose that poor old Peter must have stepped off the boat into a hole, but it does not explain how he did not sink right away not to mention that the boat must have been over the same hole to get so close to land where the Lord could lift Peter up out of the water when he sank. No my friend the Lord walked on water just like the translation says, and now I am just guessing, but I would guess that He never even got wet.
     
  3. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    Kind of reminds me of those people saying that Moses and the Israelites really crossed the REED Sea and it was low tide or something. Which makes it a miracle still because even horses drowned!! LOL
     
  4. freeatlast

    freeatlast New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes I have heard that also from some and it is always amusing and sad.
     
  5. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28

    First off, when you talk about my Jesus, you must talk about Him in two ways; one as a Man, and one as God. He WAS/IS God/Man. Here is what the OT said about what He would look like in the flesh:

    Isa. 53:1 Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the LORD revealed?

    2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.

    So in the flesh, He was no different than us. He ate, slept, ached, cried, bled, sweated, etc. What set Him apart from us was His soul. He was/is God manifested in the flesh.

    In Revelation chapter 1, you can read about what He looks like now, in His glorified body. Also, you can read about what He looked like when He transformed Himself on the mountain before Peter, James, and John. In the flesh, He was the same as us, but His soul is what set Him apart. He was able to walk upon the water, He was able to touch the coffin of the widow woman's son, and bring him back to life. He was able to heal the woman with the twelve years issue of blood. He was able to give blind Bartimaues sight by anointing them with clay and spit, etc. To deny these as divine attributes, is out and out heresy. Plain and simple, point blank heresy.
     
  6. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Correct willis....well said....:thumbsup::thumbsup::type::thumbsup:
     
  7. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    According to you as opposed to according to eyewitnesses. Hmm, who will I trust?

    This much is true.
     
  8. David Lamb

    David Lamb Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,982
    Likes Received:
    0
    JBH28 wrote: "peripateō is a verb and means to walk"

    Then you wrote:

    It must be very difficult for you, or anyone whose first language is not English, to understand exactly what other people are saying in their messages, and to write posts yourself in what to you is a foreign language.

    However, peripateō is not an English word. It is Greek. It does mean "to walk".

    It must even more difficult for you to write in one foreign language, English, about words in another foreign language, Greek.
     
  9. Goinheix

    Goinheix New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    0
    47 And when even was come, the ship was in the midst of the sea, and he alone on the land.

    48 And he saw them toiling in rowing; for the wind was contrary unto them: and about the fourth watch of the night he cometh unto them, walking upon the sea, and would have passed by them.


    Jesus was alone, unaware of the situation and only he did something when he saw tehm toiling in rowing. That is the Bible.
     
  10. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    That is adding to the text. How do you know that He was unaware?
     
  11. Goinheix

    Goinheix New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    0
    you have proved to denay the bible when the bible say contrary to your traditional thinking. i will not waste my timt.

    tell me: is the God of non baptis the same God as yours? is the Jew God the same as yours?
     
  12. Frogman

    Frogman <img src="http://www.churches.net/churches/fubc/Fr

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2001
    Messages:
    5,492
    Likes Received:
    0
    annsni, I think he is making that statement based upon these words:

    This statement could be taken to imply Christ was not aware until after he saw them toiling in rowing.

    I do not agree. I agree and know that Christ emptied himself, but I do not think he was unaware to this extent...I think of the times the Jews would have taken hold of him, but he passed through the midst of them.

    bro. Dallas
     
  13. Goinheix

    Goinheix New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    0
    :jesus:
    Did Jesus knew what the soldier at the cross was giving for him to drink. He did not knew what it was until he tasted it. Jesus did not know that, and that is enough to prove that he was not knowing everything. He was not knowing too many things along the Gospels making clear that he was not onmiscient at all.

    Along the Gospels there is many times when Jesus demostrate having a knowledge above the normal. Actually it makes not a difference. If Jesus was aware and knowing 99% of things, it means that he was not omniscient at all.

    Any how, the level of knowledge that Jesus demostrated is not supernatural or private of God. His knowledge and understanting where above of the regular man. That is all.

    Jesus was not omniscient and that is all we need to know.

    If you denay that fact... If you think Jesus actually knew it all...when did he started to have such knowledge? In he was omniscient starting in a giving point of his life; then he was not God before that time? If he had full knowledge from the very birth...then he knew about Herod intentions, he knew how to talk hebrew, he knew the best action to take. Is it like this?
     
  14. Frogman

    Frogman <img src="http://www.churches.net/churches/fubc/Fr

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2001
    Messages:
    5,492
    Likes Received:
    0
    Brother, I am trying to understand what you are saying. I do not believe the man Jesus 'became' God at some point in his life. I believe He was and is God in the Flesh, or God-Man.

    I believe Jesus in his manhood did not know some things because it was part of his human nature...but you state earlier he did not know Lazarus was dead, go back and re-read the report of Lazarus' sickness and the statement of Christ upon hearing it.

    particularly read vs. 4.

    I agree Jesus made this statement:

     
  15. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    Prove to me that He didn't know.
     
  16. Mexdeaf

    Mexdeaf New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,051
    Likes Received:
    3
    I can't believe this person is still around yanking chains. He must be LOL'ing his head off.
     
  17. jbh28

    jbh28 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    precisely. Classic troll [​IMG]
     
  18. mandym

    mandym New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    Apparently you will not waste your time spelling correctly. But this is clear that you are most likely not Baptist.
     
  19. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    islamic persons deny Jesus in this same way:(
     
  20. Goinheix

    Goinheix New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    0
    You make too much enfasis in each word i use. Jesus didnt know of the fact that Lazarus was death in the mind of his sisters. But any how. Jesus did not know many things as what it was given to him to drink at the cross.

    You think, it is your opinion that Jesus "did not know some things because it was part of his human nature" In that scenario, it is perfertly correct to say that Jesus (because of his human nature) were not aware of the situation of the disciples in the boat. In that scenario it is clear that Jesus because of his human nature was not omniscient at all. Because of Jesus human nature he did not have divine atributes. Am I right?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...