1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Just suppose it was produced...

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Salty, Feb 26, 2009.

  1. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Some of the actions that have been ongoing. Of course, the matter could be settled if our chicken SCOTUS would give it a full hearing, which they have not done so far.

    Source: WND
     
  2. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    79
    As a citizen and one who holds the constitution in high regard I have to respect the opinion of the highest court in the land as established by that amazing document.

    I love my country and am grateful for the writers of the constitution who even then knew how to keep an tiny percentage of the country from wasting the court's time on ludicrous cases.




    As to the oft quoted source? Well, enough said.
     
  3. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Except....they wouldn't give it a full hearing.....they could put the matter to rest by a full hearing.
     
  4. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    And you have proof of this, or are you just assuming this?

    What links do you have?
     
  5. JamieinNH

    JamieinNH New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    So, do we blame the court? Do we 'blame' the court everytime they don't see fit to hear something?

    Don't they do their job by looking into and it and then having a hear as they see the need? Does that mean that EVERYTIME they choose to not hear a case they are to be blamed for that action?

    just curious as to when we actually rely on the court and it's word and it's ability to do it's job to be enough for us..
     
  6. windcatcher

    windcatcher New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,764
    Likes Received:
    0
    What I said I said: The brotherhood protects its own and is the majority of power in all 3 branches of government.

    You haven't been reading my other posts (or maybe just can't see the connection) regarding associations which go deeper than politics..... as deep as religion/cults/ and the occult...... and, sometimes deeper than kinship. In the brotherhood, there are levels of communication: the lesser are held by their blood oaths and fraternal organizations to loyalty and secrecy against even suspicions of brothers or motives: The higher up it moves the tighter it gets in defining and promoting from within its own protege's, which it finds to be maleable, unquestioning, conforming to its will. Different goals are accomplished at the attainment of various stages..... some which are designed to be oppositional and polarizing so that the uninitiated do not see or are confused...... and many are satisfied to slumber in that they think they have representation of viewpoint not realizing that even the extent of that is being controled and manipulated. The progression up the pyramid is more concentrated in the confidence, secrecy, and power, and controls and directs the elements of leadership and direction of those below without informing them to purpose or plan. But at the top is a singular design and capstone goal which is yet to occur..... a new world order. Not many nations..... but one. Not many laws but one globally observed and enforceable. Not many religions, or the triune God, but one man-god which by servatude of our customs of obediance, labors and wealth, needs and dependancies, and fear of retribution, we will serve and, in essence of these customs, worship: even our appeals will be as it is already becoming, to those in power..... not to the true and only God. Not many heads of leadership.... but one over all the world which embodies the dictates of power enforced upon the representatives of perceived regional distinctions.

    No, my dear Magnetic Poles: You are wrong as to thinking only about the SCOTUS as being majority appointed by Republican Presidents.... even though they were: Each justice on the Supreme Court has also had his own party preferences before appointment..... and have a very fair representation of Democrats among them although these were appointed by the POTUS most of whom were Republican. It matters little to those at the top of the unfinished pyramid, what the party is. Loyalty and benefit to the brotherhood is the deciding factor. .............One may not believe this....... but can you name 5....... no......make that 3........... no.......make that just 1 state capital which doesn't have one symbol of the brotherhood actually connected with the design and building and dedication of it........ a Masonic stone...... or a "Lodge" associated with it. And they take a name from the Bible, Hiram, and give him a mythical and occult importance, as they converge their discipline with those of similar organizations at higher levels of leadership....... all working to establish the rule of man and the headship of man in conflict with the authority, recognition, and power belonging to God.

    And we are beginning to see the fruition of this plan come together and form itself in the rapid and recent changes which have taken place since 1948 when Israel became a nation, and 1967 when JerUSAlem was captured. Just exactly where we stand and what will be our fate and what would God have us do...... and will our choice align with God's direction in obediance, or be directed by his sovereignity to fullfill his plan including judgement for our disobediance. Our choices may make a difference as to our outcome and the judgements which we will face..... but regardless of our choices we can be sure that prophecy will be fulfilled.

    -----------------
    The courts judge the law and evidence. The SCOTUS judges what is within or without the boundaries set by the constitution of the USA. I'm not aware of any summary determination being made regarding Obama's constitutional requirements to qualify as President. I do think the SCOTUS, has limited powers, but one which they do have is to choose to hear or refuse to hear a case and make a judgement. In this case the people have no option available to force the SCOTUS to hear a case: The only option afforded by the constitution is that of impeachment of the justices..... and that must be based on an ambiguious standard of 'bad behavior'. While the people might be able to find one or maybe two legislators to offer such a petition or censur of the courts, it is extreme to think that such could gain enough support to even vex the SCOTUS into action.
     
  7. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    30,023
    Likes Received:
    1,350
    Faith:
    Baptist
    FOLKS!!!

    OP STATES
    "NO DEBATE"
    This is a "just suppose"

    C4K put it best "Ok, I'll play along..."

    If you want to debate, please start another thread - or go to the other ones.
     
  8. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Careful here, WC, you will creep some people out---the same people who would never do a Google search on Bohemian Grove.
     
  9. AntennaFarmer

    AntennaFarmer Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    610
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the Supreme Court would hold that Obama is qualified because his Mama was a citizen. Any statute holding otherwise would be declared unconsitutional.

    Obama would stay in office.
     
  10. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    7,047
    Likes Received:
    636
    As demonstrated several times, according to the laws in place at the time of his birth, Obama would not be a U.S. citizen if born in Kenya because his mother had not lived in the U.S. for 5 years after her 16th birthday (she was about 19).

    Playing along, I think the dems would make the same argument they made with the current treasury sec.: It doesn't matter what he's done in the past, he is the only one on the planet that can lead us into the future.

    He would finish out his term, loose re-election, and make 100's of millions in speeches (which he wouldn't disclose to the IRS, like the rest of the democrats, so as to avoid paying those higher taxes:smilewinkgrin: )

    peace to you:praying:
     
  11. AntennaFarmer

    AntennaFarmer Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    610
    Likes Received:
    0
    That is what I am saying.....The Supreme Court would overturn that law even if it is shown to apply.

    A.F.
     
  12. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    7,047
    Likes Received:
    636
    The law has already been changed.

    To find the law unconstitutional, the Supreme Court would have to deny the precedent already set that congress has the authority to determine citizenship requirements by law for those not born in the U.S.

    It is unlikely the SOTUS would do that, IMHO.

    I do not believe the SOTUS would hear this case in a million years. The lower courts have ruled in favor of Obama. That will be the last word.

    peace to you:praying:
     
Loading...