1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

KJO MOVEMENT

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Salty, Apr 26, 2016.

Top Posters
  1. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,982
    Likes Received:
    2,615
    Faith:
    Baptist
    #1 Salty, Apr 26, 2016
  2. InTheLight

    InTheLight Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    24,988
    Likes Received:
    2,268
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It's not too bad, but it gives rebuttals of KJVO short shrift. It suffers, like almost all arguments against the Alexandrian texts, by calling them "corrupt" and then offering no reasoning behind the claim, except that these manuscripts were from Egypt. Again and again the Alexandrian texts are called "unreliable" or "corrupt" and no good examples of why they are corrupt are given.
     
    #2 InTheLight, Apr 26, 2016
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Like most wikipedia articles it is all over the place. Many of the characteristics cited as being KJVO are not, but rather are scholarly opinions regarding the relative merits of the Byzantine and Alexandrian textforms and the representatives of the Byzantine textform, the Majority text, the Received text, The Robinson/Pierpont text, etc.
     
    #3 TCassidy, Apr 26, 2016
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Loading...