1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

KJV Opinion in 1955

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Rippon, Feb 24, 2008.

  1. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "The Famous New York Fundamentalist -- Modernist Debates -- The Orthodox Side " by John Roach Straton . He was the epitome of a Fundamentalist . This was back in 1924 and 1925 .

    He quoted the RV approvingly on page 202 : In the correct translation of Titus 2:13 , the translation given in the English revision , our Lord Jesus is spoken of as "our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ."
     
  2. EdSutton

    EdSutton New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    As C4K asked earlier, basically, what does any of this actually prove?

    I have cited virtually every English version of the more than 20, that can be found on Bible Gateway, at one time or another, plus versions that are not found on Bible Gateway, plus occasionally giving my own rendering of some NT passages.

    Were any faultless? Nope. Was one better than another? Yep, in every instance I cited, IMO. FTR, I've never technically cited the RV, never having access to it, but always the double-first cousin, sibling of the ASV. The ASV was my regular Bible for some years, that I carried.

    As the cloistered monk limited to ten words may have said:

    "Translation good;

    eyes weak;

    print bad;

    binding poor;

    I switch!"


    Ed

    P.S. The individual you earlier referred to is the late Dr. Cornelius Van Til, one of the outstanding Christian Apologists of all time, IMO. I never had the privilege of meeting him, but one of my closest friends lived very near him, and did have the privilege of interacting with Dr. Van Til several times.
     
    #22 EdSutton, Mar 6, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 6, 2008
  3. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    P.B.V. = Prayer Book Version (Book of Common Prayer)
     
  4. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "Abstract Of Systematic Theology" 1887

    This was by James P. Boyce ( not James M. Boice who died in Jume of 2000 ) .

    He called the RV The Canterbury Version . He cited it several times . On page 202 he said :"But the more correct translations of the Canterbury Revisors and their American Committee are still stronger." ( Still stronger renderings of Hebrews 2:16 ) .
     
  5. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "The Great World Crisis" 1950

    This book was authored by Douglas Ober a good friend of Wilber M. Smith ,who wrote the foreward .

    He quoted the RV on 13 pages . On page 41 he cited the ARV .
     
  6. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "The Silence Of God" 1907

    This work was by Sir Robert Anderson . He cited the RV 6 times according to my count . All were positive . But on other pages he faulted certain RV wordings .
     
  7. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "The Numerical Structure Of Scripture"

    This was authored by F.W. Grant . He first wrote it in 1887 . It went through several revisions in his life and some after death . I counted 5 positive citations of the RV . He said things such as "The RV rightly reads .." or "...as the RV rightly puts it now."
     
  8. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The purpose of this thread is to demonstrate that plenty of conservative Evangelicals or Fundamentalists of the past commended other Bible translations . It shows that they were not engaged in any KJV Onlyism .
     
  9. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Pardon me for adding an extra "l" to his last name . I am actually more impressed with his adversary : Gordon H. Clark . But I was moved to learn that Van Til was not an Ivory Tower Theologian . He witnessed as a street preacher on Wall Street at times .
     
  10. Ehud

    Ehud New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2007
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    0
    He lied...or at least was not honest
    Ehud
    " Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things."2 Timothy 2:7
     
  11. EdSutton

    EdSutton New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    I actually referred to Dr. Van Til by name, as you had named about 8 individuals in your posts, so my referring without the name would have been meaningless. (Unlike a few others, you do not normally grab the attention of Language Cop, and did not here.)

    I believe three or four of my schoolmates at Bible College who located in the Philadelphia area, later took classes at Westminster Seminary and actually had Dr. "Kees" Van Til in some classes. You are right that he was a practical individual, and not merely some 'Academic', though, from what I do know. I don't know any particulars about the late Dr. Gordon Clark, although I am aware of him.

    Ed
     
  12. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "The Book Of Revelation" By William R.Newell

    This book was published in 1935 .The following words are printed before the first chapter .

    Author's Note

    THE TEXT used is in general that of the Revised Version , which is much more accurate than that of the Old Version . At times it is necessary to render literally ; and , in several instances to paraphrase , to make clearer the meaning .
     
  13. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "The Wells Of Salvation ...

    Meditations on Isaiah" by Charles and Norma Ellis . It was published by Banner of Truth in 1985 . Now that is a conservative organization by anyone's estimate .
    The following is taken from part of the preface .

    In 1976 , just after we had each read the preliminary NIV paperback translation of Isaiah , the idea for this book was conceived . We each felt that in this translation we had been given a glimpse fuller than before of the beauty of God and his truth . Although we were devoted to the Authorized Version , we felt that in the NIV God was speaking to the average reader in our day , even as he had been speaking to the average person in Isaiah's day .
     
  14. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I mentioned Ironside in post #17 . However , in looking through his "Notes On The book Of Proverbs" he has something interesting to say in his Prefatory Note .

    The "Authorized" Version is used in the text , save where a uniform rendering of certain words seemed conducive to clearness , and where some other translation better expressed the thought of the original .
     
  15. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Ehud , you don't want to be charged with dishonesty . Be specific and give us proof that Dr. Metzger lied when he stated that no essential doctrine of Christianity has been undermined .
     
  16. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    G. Campbell Morgan: The Teaching Of Christ 1913

    He quoted favorably from Rotherham's Tranmslation and also commended Weymouth's .
     
  17. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Christ In The Psalms by William Pettingill 1937

    He quoted primarily from the Revised Version , but also cited the American Revised Version .

    Interestingly , the book was put out by 'Fundamental Truth Publishers' !
     
  18. rbell

    rbell Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    (sigh)

    Gotta love these incindiery charges, with no documentation whatsoever.

    Don't worry....I won't hold my breath waiting for the documentation that isn't coming.
     
  19. Salamander

    Salamander New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    3,965
    Likes Received:
    0
    Psalm 78:36 as found in the NASV:But they deceived Him with their mouth And lied to Him with their tongue.

    Can your God be deceived?

    Any God that could be doesn't qualify as God, just any god that has to be carried out from a burning building so it survive is not God.

    Isn't it "essential" that God cannot be deceived?

    Why, YES! Of course!

    (I corrected my typo. thanks ASKJO)
     
    #39 Salamander, Mar 19, 2008
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2008
  20. Salamander

    Salamander New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    3,965
    Likes Received:
    0
    And Ironside had the Original Autographs to substanciate that claim.:laugh:
     
Loading...