1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured KVJ Is Not Literal, but Functional Equivalent

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Reformed1689, Jan 27, 2020.

  1. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    • Informative Informative x 2
  2. Reformed

    Reformed Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    4,960
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    Faith:
    Baptist
    My introductory Greek class used Mounce's "Basics of Biblical Greek". Textbook aside, I think he is wrong on his opinion of the KJV even though the KJV is not my daily reader.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
  3. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yeah I was a little surprised as I was reading to see it listed in that grouping.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Reformed

    Reformed Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    4,960
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I am thinking more about this. I have always considered the KJV as a formal equivalence translation, not a dynamic equivalence. Mounce makes a good point that all translations are interpretive, it is the type of interpretive steps that makes a translation as word-for-word as possible or thought-for-thought.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I've heard that the KJV translators sought to make the text poetic as well which would lend it to being more functional.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Did anyone figure out what Mounce's point was, for saying:

    "They was not marked for gender in Elizabethan English (check out Shakespeare) "
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  8. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That he has changed his mind or can't make up his mind?
    Can anyone tell the time sequence on these? All I see is a month and day of month, which no year?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That the pronoun "they" was used in Elizabethan English/Shakespeare for either singular or plural, so that it was used instead of he or she to keep from using a gender pronoun. Or something like that.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,162
    Likes Received:
    163
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Where does Mounce place the NKJV then?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. Reformed

    Reformed Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    4,960
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Probably the same as the KJV.

    Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
     
    • Like Like x 2
  13. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,362
    Likes Received:
    668
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Every English Bible translation MUST use some formal equivalence to make sense in English due to language differences.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Rippon2

    Rippon2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2020
    Messages:
    1,119
    Likes Received:
    177
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You meant functional equivalence.
     
  15. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    • Like Like x 1
  16. alexander284

    alexander284 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,497
    Likes Received:
    335
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Bill Mounce is all over the place, isn't he? Lol
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    There are places where it does indeed translate functionally into English, but so does even the nas, so would still be overall a formal translation!
     
  18. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    All translation use a bit of formal/functional in their process, but the question would be on which side do they mainly end up being on?
     
  19. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Wouldn't the Nrsv/Csb/Niv 2011 all be in same camp?
     
  20. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The big question is how does it the majority of the time choose to translate into English?
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
Loading...