Lebanon war prophesied beforehand?

Someone sent me this today. I do not think I have ever heard of the man who gave these words before i read this. Maybe someone familiar with him can verify the date these words were given. Some of the predictions appear to be as of yet unfulfilled.

I apologize for the lousy formatting. I am just posting as I recieved it.

See below from Chuch Pierce and tell what you
think:
Watch Lebanon!
On January 29, 2006, when I was speaking in a church
service at
Jubilee Church in Camarillo, CA., the Lord began to
speak to me about
Lebanon.
One of the things they do at Jubilee is pray for the
nations each
Sunday. When I saw the flag of Lebanon, it was lit up
by the Holy Spirit
for me to see. The Lord then began to quicken a
prophetic word to me.
He said, "Watch Lebanon!"
Not only was He speaking to that church and the people
there, as a
personal call for them to watch over the nation of
Lebanon, but I felt
like He was speaking to us as His people, that Lebanon
would become
a real prayer focus and issue this year. I was
hesitant to interrupt the
service and give this word, because I was not
confident about who in
the service would understand the concept of Lebanon
today. However,
I am glad that I heeded the Lord's voice that He was
calling us to pray
for Lebanon this year.
Prophesied on January 29, 2006 in
Camarillo, CA
"In the midst of the summer at the hottest point, you
will begin to
see the snow of Lebanon melt. Watch as Palestine and
Syria form
an ungodly alliance with Lebanon. For Lebanon is at
the end of the
fork of the road of change for the Middle East.
Lebanon will become
an issue that causes the Middle East to go one way or
the other."
"In the midst of the beauty and grandeur of this
place, I will begin
to write a new script over how the nations will
realign."
"Out of Lebanon, a new wineskin will form, and a new
river will
begin to rise."
"I will bring conflict into Lebanon, because it is the
boundary that I
will deal with this year concerning My promised land
of Israel. The
warlike tribes of Lebanon will once again arise. But
in the end, I will
win this war, and the riches that have been withheld
from My
Kingdom plan will be released."
"Watch and see, for there is a new vision. For in the
days ahead,
you will hear a cry arise from the deep affliction and
mourning that
comes out of Lebanon. Out of the ancient city of
Damascus, you will
see a caravan arise. I, 'Ancient of Days,' will create
a conflict in
Damascus. My power will be displayed to the world,
when I break
the confederation of demonic hosts that are aligned
against My
covenant plan."
"Out of Damascus will come a new move of My Spirit.
Many
conversions and miracles will occur in the region that
surrounds
Damascus. Watch, because I am realigning the nations
of this
region. I will send angelic forces to guard My plan.
No matter how
Syria arises against that plan at this time, I will
have warring
angelic forces that will counteract the plan of men
that are aligned
with evil forces to create havoc.
"Sing the songs of the Ancient of Days for it is those
songs that
will create the sound of victory over the lands of
this region."
Blessings,
Chuck D. Pierce

 

What is more important? Your doctrine about the Bible which does not come from the Bible, or what the Bible actually teaches? The Bible does not teach that all revelation is in scripture. It actually refers to revelation that is not in scripture (e.g. what one of those thunder claps said that was sealed up and not included in Revelation, Micaiah's previous prophecies about the king, the book of Iddo the seer, the words of the prophecies that Saul gave, etc.)

The Bible teaches that God speaks to people through prophecy. It also teaches 'Despise not prophesyings.'

Maybe you don't know if this word is from God, but assuming any prophecy that comes to pass you hear is from the Devil is dangerous. What were the Pharisees doing when Jesus warned them about committing the unpardonable sin? They were saying that the Spirit Christ cast out devils by was Beelzebub. They called the Spirit Beelzebub. If a prophecy is from the Spirit, and you call the Spirit that gave it Beelezebub, that sure is a dangerous thing to do.

Btw also, to the poster who said that Satan can't give born again believers visions, Satan showed Christ Himself the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them, and took Him to the pinnacle of the temple.

 

God made many predictions about Gentile nations in the Old Testament, back when the nations were much more pagan than they are now (in that they did not have Christians in them.)

That is the issue. You should not dismiss a spirit without 'testing' it. What is your criteria for testing? Your feelings? A theological viewpoint that you hold to? I don't see how you can test a spirit without revelation from God, either through scripture or from gifts of the Spirit. If you don't believe in revelation from the Spirit anymore, what scriptural criteria do you use for judging this prophecy?

Before you say anything else, consider the idea that if the S/spirit behind this is the Holy Spirit, you may have just called the Holy Spirit 'shakey at best.' I hope for your sake that God doesn't consider that blasphemy.

Christ was driving out a demon, not saying something was going to happen when it happened.

>
There are no more prophetic utterances that we are in need of hearing, because all we need to know is contained on the pages of The Living Word of God.
<

Friend, what you are saying contradicts the pages you are talking about. The Bible says despise not prophesyings. It tells us that there will be prophets at the end of time. Check out the book of Revelation. The two witnesses prophesy.

The Bible teaches us that God speaks to the church throught he gift of prophecy. Nowhere does it say that we can do away with these teachings of the Bible because we have the Bible. Does that make sense, that we don't need to believe certain teachings of the Bible because we have the Bible? Wouldn't it be better to just believe what the Bible teaches (that God speaks through prophecy) than to believe in a doctrine about scripture that the Bible does not teach (that God does not speak outside of scripture.)

 

The Bible does not teach that all revelation is in the Holy Scripture. The Bible proves, in fact, that this idea is not true. The Bible certainly does not teach that all we need is the Holy Scriptures.

If you have the Bible, but don't have faith, can you be saved? If you have the Bible, but don't have the Holy Spirit, do you have all you need? We need the things the Bible talks about. It is not enough just to have the Bible. Prophecy and other gifts are some of those things the Bible talks about.

You might argue that all we need is mentioned in the Holy Scriptures. The Bible mentions the gift of prophecy and urges the saints to seek it. The Bible mentions many other spiritual gifts.

If prophecies are no longer needed why will the Two Witnesses prophesy?

 

A lot of Isaiah's prophecies have come to pass. A lot of John's prophecies have come to pass. We are still waiting on some of them. We are still waiting on that prophesy from Paul given by the word of the Lord about those who went to sleep in Christ and will be raised at His coming.

Also, the prophet who spoke falsely in the of the LORD back in Old Testament times could be allowed to live, while the true prophets were persecuted. It's not like Israel obyed al those laws.

Link