1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Liberals vs al Qaeda

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Scott J, Nov 10, 2006.

Top Posters
  1. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Pelosi said that Iraq wasn't a war to be won but a situation to be solved.

    The liberals and Dems have denied vehemently that Iraq has anything to do with the War on Terror (aka Islamofascism).

    Al Qaeda disagrees.

    http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20061110/D8LAC4OG1.html

    Implicit in this report is the notion that al Qaeda viewed the Republican defeat as a victory for them.
     
    #1 Scott J, Nov 10, 2006
  2. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    They know democrats have no stomach for a fight.

    No wonder they're happy.
     
    #2 carpro, Nov 10, 2006
  3. StraightAndNarrow

    StraightAndNarrow Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Messages:
    2,508
    Likes Received:
    3

    The war in Iraq certainly does have an impact on terrorism. It has made it much worse by serving as a training ground for al-Quaeda.
     
    #3 StraightAndNarrow, Nov 10, 2006
  4. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Only if you call dying training or think that their terrorist efforts prior to Iraq were ineffective.

    They didn't seem to have too much difficulty in Somalia or even NY, did they?


    Again, following the stupidity of such "logic", we should never fight an aggressor since they might learn how to fight us better... we should never pursue criminals since they might learn how to evade justice...

    Your statement is inane. You can't appease your enemies simply because they won't sit there stupid and let you beat them...

    I can almost see how a liberal would think that though. You think the "rich" will just accept tax increases without collecting them from those you are supposedly defending by raising prices, cutting wages and benefits, reducing headcount, and demanding the same from their vendors thus hurting their employees as well. The only real beneficiaries of "tax the rich" are lying politicians, bureaucrats, and accountants. Everyone else loses.
     
    #4 Scott J, Nov 10, 2006
  5. Not_hard_to_find

    Not_hard_to_find Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    714
    Likes Received:
    0
    It was what al Qaeda wanted.
     
    #5 Not_hard_to_find, Nov 10, 2006
  6. Baptist in Richmond

    Baptist in Richmond Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    5,122
    Likes Received:
    19
    Don't forget:
    1. Iraq had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the attack on September 11th.
    2. OBL hated Saddam, and the feeling was definitely mutual.
    3. Al-Zarqawi was in Iraq prior to the invasion - he was up in the Kurdish region that Saddam did not control.
    4. Now that we are there, so are the terrorists - many of them from other countries.
    5. Saddam was a brutal dictator - and there is now way he would have supplied OBL with any WMD, especially since the evidence suggests that he hasn't had them since the end of the first Gulf War.
    6. The US is now stuck in a quagmire. We cannot leave now, and there is no end in sight.

    There you go again with a discussion on "liberals." Remember that it wasn't a "liberal" that raised the debt ceiling more than once.....

    Regards, hope all is well,
    BiR
     
    #6 Baptist in Richmond, Nov 10, 2006
  7. UnchartedSpirit

    UnchartedSpirit New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,176
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm too lazy to care about who wastes mroe money or not it never changes anything to my life anyway...im' too low to be in the system
     
    #7 UnchartedSpirit, Nov 10, 2006
  8. StraightAndNarrow

    StraightAndNarrow Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Messages:
    2,508
    Likes Received:
    3
    BUSH himself said that there was no connection between the Iraq invasion an the war on terrorism.
     
    #8 StraightAndNarrow, Nov 11, 2006
  9. LeBuick

    LeBuick New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    1
    To finish your statement, because it led to the removal of Rumsfeld. Now do you really believe removing Rumfeld changes the war? Do you really believe removing Rumfeld is a victory for Al-Qaida?

    "On the audio tape made available on militant Web sites, the al-Qaida in Iraq leader also welcomed the Republican electoral defeat that led to the departure of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld. He added that the group's fighters would not rest until they had blown up the White House."
     
    #9 LeBuick, Nov 11, 2006
  10. Daisy

    Daisy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    The official war was won back in 2004. The Iraqi Army is our ally now - we supply them with money, guns and training.

    If we are treating the current fighting as a war, then captured fighters from the other side should be treated as POWs don't you think? Al Qaeda has no national boundaries and a very loose command structure.

    That's not quite right - Iraq didn't used to have anything to do with the War on Terror, aka al Qaeda, but we brought it to them because we prefer to fight in their back yards.

    Do you believe everything al Qaeda says?

     
    #10 Daisy, Nov 12, 2006
  11. Not_hard_to_find

    Not_hard_to_find Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    714
    Likes Received:
    0
    Personally, I find it more interesting to me that Daisy and I are in agreement -- have been in several issues over the last month or so. Hmm, and I getting more intelligent?
     
    #11 Not_hard_to_find, Nov 12, 2006
  12. Daisy

    Daisy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    Perhaps neither of us are totally dogmatic party-liners...
     
    #12 Daisy, Nov 12, 2006
  13. The Galatian

    The Galatian New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2001
    Messages:
    9,687
    Likes Received:
    1
    Al Qaeda has freely admitted that Bush's invasion of Iraq was a great victory for them, as it gave them a new base of operations, and a wonderful recruiting tool.

    So they cooperated with Bush in the campaign, by endorsing his opponents, knowing that endorsement would help Bush.

    Or are they are so stupid, that they think their endorsement of candidates would make Americans vote for them?

    Aren't they?

    (WFTH-I)
     
    #13 The Galatian, Nov 12, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 12, 2006
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Loading...