1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Mattress Company in Wisconsin Insults Our Soldiers!!

Discussion in '2008 Archive' started by snrsvdbygrc, Jan 23, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. James_Newman

    James_Newman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    Then why are they trying to order floor mats off the internet? I don't get it...
     
  2. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Sure you do.

    For the same reason I had a Corpsman in my squad in Vietnam that carried a rubber air mattress everywhere he went and spent an hour every evening blowing it up. Some guys like their comfort.:)

    The rest of us just laughed at him. The ground, wet or dry, beat carrying the extra weight and taking the time to blow it up. We had enough on our backs the way it was.
     
  3. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is it your belief that every nation that is in defiance of UN Security Council Resolutions should be invaded and regime changed?
     
  4. Daisy

    Daisy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bapmom,

    How was that criticizing? I quoted the same article carpro deemed "unimpeachable". Your own sense of fairmindedness should realize that mere statement of fact, pointing out that 40,000 soldiers did not have state of the art body armor, that some bought their own - which was the question - which they were later forbidden to use, is not criticism. I didn't say whether it was good or bad, just that it was.

    How many billions of dollars did the Democrats and Republicans authorize for this war? Do you really think for a moment that anyone voted specifically not to fund properly equipping the soldiers? Rumsfeld was one of the main authors for downsizing the military (with the, in hindsight, mistaken idea that modern warfare favored quick strike-and-get-out) and expensive short-term outsourcing support services (food, laundry, etc) would be economical in the long-run.
     
  5. James_Newman

    James_Newman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm not sure then what you are trying to prove. Either these men were sissies for trying to get a mat to sleep on, or the government ought to make them available to inlisted men who don't want to sleep on the ground. What could it possibly cost? I'm sure they could lease them from Halliburton or KBR for a reasonable monthly fee.
     
  6. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes you are.

    You just don't agree.
     
  7. James_Newman

    James_Newman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, I really don't. Are you saying it is reasonable for these men to have to order a mat to sleep on?
     
  8. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Of course it is. They are furnished cots and bedding.

    Sometimes their mission requires them to sleep away from their base. They are also furnished ponchos and they can carry what bedding they need(usually just a blanket) with them.

    If they want the additional comfort of some kind of mat, they can buy it themselves.
     
  9. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't get a lot about this thread and I certainly don't get what side Carpro is on.

    If this article is correct...Sgt. seeking floor mats gets insult instead...this has nothing to do with sleeping soldiers but conference rooms, warehouses, garages and wobbly chairs and tables.

    “The conference room floor is some rough concrete because we are in what used to be warehouses or garages, and none of the chairs sit even and the table wobbles,” Hess told Army Times in an e-mail."​

    This company is not even a "mattress" company as it is called Discount-Mats (it's down now due to "technical difficulties"). However, if we go to the way back machine it is quite clear that Discount-Mats is not in the mattress business.
    http://web.archive.org/web/20060529200546/http://www.discount-mats.com/

    I wonder why a whole bunch of people thought soldiers were being deprived of sleeping mattresses...

    "The Internet stories spread like wildfire, including at least one that said the soldier was looking for mattresses for his unit because they were sleeping on the cold ground with sand fleas and mites.​

    “I sent the reporter the correct information, but the business is still in the wrong with their return e-mail,” Hess said.​

    “This is a great example of the American people supporting their soldiers,” said Maj. Randall Baucom, the 1st BCT public affairs officer. “We understand that people are lining up back home to send our troops sleeping mattresses. That’s great, but we don’t need them.”​

    In short, the Sargeant was ordering non-essential supplies and an employee of the vendor he tried to procure it from, was rude and unprofessional. The employee has been fired and the site is now down. Kind of a big deal made out of a not very big deal, reported by an organization that lacks anything resembling journalistic skills but they sure put on a fun show.

    [Edit: Removed "Sgt. Hess"]
     
    #49 Rufus_1611, Jan 24, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 24, 2007
  10. Daisy

    Daisy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh.

    Um, never mind.
     
  11. James_Newman

    James_Newman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
  12. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It shouldn't be too hard to follow.

    First it was you that posed this question:

    Rufus wrote:

    Would any current or former military professionals comment on this story relevant to the procurement of supplies? Is it common for a sargeant, who is in theater, to have to spend time shopping online for essential supplies for his soldiers?

    Implying of course, that these mats were "essential".

    Then it was Daisy who sidetracked us to the body armor issue.

    Then

    LE Wrote:
    Whether it's mattresses, body armor, upgraded humvees or whatever, the DOD has an obligation to supply our soldiers sent into harm's way with the best of everything possible. Color me disgusted.

    My position has been constant. They are furnished what they need. If they want a piece of equipment that is not furnished by Uncle Sam, they have to buy it themselves. End of story.

    What's difficult about that?
     
  13. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    This thing is too messed up to try to argue over it. I retract the statement.
     
  14. snrsvdbygrc

    snrsvdbygrc New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    0
    Uhmm hello, let me sum up the context of the conversation before you take my post out of context. Daisy stated the Iraq was trying to avoid war. My post stated several reasons why they were not only NOT trying to avoid war but to provoke war.

    As for a response to your question. We went into Iraq in 1990 to do a job and ended the war promptly, conditionally upon UN resolutions. Those resolutions were never met once senior W was out of office, and not only were not met the defiance of them was flaunted in the face of the world. Yes we should have gone into Iraq a long time before we did; should every country be invaded and regime change that defies the UN. Silly question. Look at the context of the country doing the defying. The UN randomly picks and chooses which countries will actually enforce its resolutions. It did not tolerate Bosnia's defiance at all. But the UN was in cahoots with the UN and corruption led by Kofi Annan and therefore chose to ignore Iraq, also knowing Clinton did not have the fortitude to fight.
     
  15. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Closed per previous warning. LE
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...