1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Military or Market-Driven Empire Building: 1950-2008

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by poncho, May 5, 2008.

  1. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    We aren't so far apart on this as you may imagine NS. I don't view America as the source of evil in this world at all. It's the corrupt greedy and sleazy posers that use America's military and economic might to advance and consolidate their own wealth, power and control over their neighbors or fellow citizens and/or the world who I hold responsible. (and find despicable)

    Not the USA. Big difference. I love this country and it's people...but I have no love or respect at all for those who use it and us for personal enrichment and self gratification and I never will. I won't make the mistake of confusing the two as one or lower myself to speak or act as if those who clearly understand this concept are somehow un-American, racist, demented or somehow deluded (or dangerous to society). I think those who do such things are being dishonest with not only the rest of us but themselves as well and doing a great diservice to the very country they claim to love above those they seek to marginalize and discredit. They dishonor the very principles and many many sacrifices it took to found the US of A and those who have and are actually doing their patriotic duty to jealously protect it from "all enemies foreign and domestic".

    That's how I see it. I'm USA all the way! You...I don't know about yet but I still have high hopes for ya. :smilewinkgrin:
     
    #21 poncho, May 11, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 11, 2008
  2. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is true that some people will exploit any situation for their own advantage. It has always been that way and it is part of the human condition. Point out those things, hold leaders accountable. That is fine and it is our job.

    The problem comes when people spread fears of scandal and cabal where they don't exist, and no amount of explanation will satisfy them. It is a very corrosive thing, and it brings to mind teenagers who have discovered that their parents are not always good & wise after all. No insult intended, that is just how I interpret it.
     
  3. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    lol...Oh, well I appreciate that vote of confidence. Jesus is not done with me yet.
     
  4. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    It's okay when those "acting" on behalf of the state hype threats spread fear and exploit those fears to consolidate the elite controlled state apparatus' already massive un-consitutionally attained powers and control though right? Even sweeter when you happen to be wearing the team colors of the...(what word am I looking for? let's see un-constituionally = un-lawful which = illegal which = a crime. So.) the criminals perpetrating the crime, correct?

    That would make those who cheer them on while (desperately) trying to marginalize, discredit and silence opposition to their brazen criminal ways and covering up for and excusing them what exactly?

    Accessories before and after the fact
    ...wouldn't it? I'm not a lawyer or anything but maybe a "conspiracy to commit fraud" against the USA case could be made up if there were a brave and willing legal expert...hmmm...Obama is allegedly a constitutional usurper er eh hem, lawyer...well forget him he's part of the "conspiracy". Did you know that the word "conspiracy" is one of the most commonly used words in our legal system? Proving what, you might ask? Oh nothing just that "conspiracies" are manifest. So, it's silly, naive and a tad bit cliche I might add to dismiss them as merely the delusions of madmen.

    (note* there are three seperate definitions of "conspiracy" hotlinked)

    Neither am I. Count on it! :laugh: :applause: :thumbs:

    Martin...I know you're always lurking around peaking at my posts when you think I'm not watching. I ain't done with you yet either bubba. :smilewinkgrin:
     
    #24 poncho, May 11, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 11, 2008
  5. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    The FISA reform bill was approved by Congress. It is only 14 pages long, so they can't claim that they were signing into law something they didn't understand. They have staff who read such things.

    Under the older form of FISA, challenged in in 1980,
    [United States v. Truong Dinh Hung, 4th Cir.] it was held that the President did have inherent authority to conduct warrantless searches to obtain foreign intelligence information. That seems pretty straight forward, and as a non-lawyer, I not sure where this "massive un-constitutionality" comes into play. I'm sure you will tell me though.


    I have never desperately tried to discredit or silence opposition. In fact, I generally have kept my mouth shut. I have only reacted when you make some particularly brazen claim that is unsupported by evidence.

    Well, that truce didn't last very long, did it?
     
  6. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    People were sounding the alarm about Saddam (for instance) long before Bush took office. Democrats mostly, and they did so because intelligence from several countries and the UN convinced them that there was something to fear.

    The Bush administartion warned of possible follow-up attacks after 9/11 because of the proven ability of our enemies to strike us here, and their declared intent to hit us. Bush didn't dream these things up. There were legitimate reasons to be alarmed.

    On the other hand, people like Paul Craig Roberts were making, and continue to make unfounded allegations based on nothing but suspicion.
     
  7. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    There's a couple of your objections I'd like to reply to NS but I'm pretty tired so I'm going to take a break for tonight. Let me just say I wasn't pointing a finger at you personally about trying to silence people. I was refering to the system in general and it's legions of talking heads that "educate the masses". Sorry I don't make that clearer in my posts. I'm just a humble glass guy and never had no fancy schoolin.

    When ever you come across stuff like that don't take it personal it isn't meant that way. I'll be back after I get some rest.

    One point I'd like to touch on though.

    Mostly it comes from reading the constitution and the founders writtings and comparing it to what I see happening around us* today and throughout history. I'll tell ya this much tonight the massive unconstitutionalites started long before the Bush/Clinton coalition started working on them. You've got to widen your range of focus and try to focus more on the big picture. Stretch out NS, stretch out. :)

    *us= the human race not just republicans and democrats or even citizens of one nation or another. (Refer to signature, can you agree with it?)

    Think about it.

    Later.
     
    #27 poncho, May 12, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 12, 2008
  8. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks poncho, and don't take my criticisms personally either I hope.

    There is truth to it. Many of us want to control behavior that we consider immoral. The problem being, of course, that there is disagreement about what is moral and what isn't. Christians vs. New-Age types; Traditionalists vs. Progressives. "Personal behavior matters most" vs. "Corporate Behavior matters most." Thus the whole Lefty/Righty tug-of-war.

    And the other element is Live-and-let-live vs. the Control-freaks. We may think something is immoral or destructive but don't feel it's worthwhile to get agitated about it, whereas others may feel compelled to jump into the fray.

    I personally am a centrist circa 1965.
     
  9. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It takes alot of energy to read through propoganda like this.
     
  10. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    You mean the original post? The article by the professor?
     
  11. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Yeah I know it starts out rough but stay tuned in Rev sooner or later I'll be rested up enough to go at it again.

    Just not tonight. ;)
     
    #31 poncho, May 13, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 13, 2008
  12. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Oh yeah NS...did you hear about the latest Pentagon propaganda program? Some of your garden variety empire builders right there, the state and the military industrial complex. Started a thread on it.

    Been reading some Paul Craig Roberts tonight, wanna see it?

    http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts05132008.html

    Apparently he has just read [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Patrick J. Buchanan's new book.

    [/SIZE][/FONT]
    I'll be ordering this book.

    Think I can hear some fake conservatives coming this way now. (generally speaking) :D

    Couldn't help it.
     
    #32 poncho, May 13, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 13, 2008
  13. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Haven't forgotten about you NS. It's the weekend now and I'll try to muster up the energy to get to those points of your's. Got a plan to go catch some stripped bass in the morning but I'll have a couple hours in the evening to spare. :smilewinkgrin:
     
  14. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Nobody to my knowledge including myself have ever claimed POTUS doesn't have the authority to conduct foreign surviellance without warrants. Here at home in these United States it's quite different. You've read the fourth amendment it's well written and easy enough to understand so you know what it means. General Hayden on the other hand thinks it gives the state the right to conduct "reasonable warrantless searches" on U.S. citizens and their property.On U.S. soil.

    He's wrong about that...but correct about this.
     
    #34 poncho, May 18, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 18, 2008
  15. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    My goal is to learn to be an individualist which isn't an easy thing I mght add after being steeped in the consensus of collectivism my whole life. It's going slower than I'd hoped for the most part but I'm improving.

    I really have no use for the whole leftie vs rightie thing it only serves to distract us from real issues. Having no stake in either side is probably the most "freedom" I'll ever see in this life. So what both sides think I'm nuts...comes with the territory.

    Centrist what's that? Someone who usually gives the state and it's controlling oligarchy the benefit of the doubt?
     
    #35 poncho, May 18, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 18, 2008
  16. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    Feith's book just arrived last Thurs. but I won't crack it for another month or so.
     
  17. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was just responding your earlier contention (via Heinlen) that there's no such thing as Left/Right; only varying degrees of desire to control. But there is such a thing as left/right, and it manifests in the type of behaviors that we want to control. Left says we must control corporations, and of course Bush. Right says we should control the indoctrination of our children by academia etc. Extreme left and extreme right seem to be indistinguishable anymore, judging from the rhetoric.

    Someone who can see the merits of arguments from both sides. The "circa 1965" comment refers to the fact that the center has moved to the left since then. At that time, most people did give the authorities benefit of the doubt. I don't think centrism is taking the easy way, since the common response to anything these days is to blame the 'gubmint', and most anyone defending them is suspect.

    Same thing in the center, if you can even find the center anymore.

    He's got some interesting insider info. Only thing is that he, like everyone else involved, tends to blame others for all the mistakes made.
     
  18. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    The ACLU is one of the primary opponents of the Protect America Act of 2007, passed by Congress, which I think is what the fuss is all about. This, essentially, is what ACLU says about it, "The new program only requires that the surveillance be targeted at people overseas. While this will allow collection of foreign-to-foreign calls, it also allows the government to pick up all international communications where one party is in the United States, so long as no one particular person in the U.S. is being targeted.”

    Well, what is the problem? As a non-expert, it seems to me that if our enemies are talking to US residents, or even US citizens, I think it would be wise to check them out, including physical searches and trace surveillance. Congress passed the legislation allowing such, and as was pointed out earlier, the bill is only 14 pages long, so they can't now claim they were misled.
     
    #38 NiteShift, May 19, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 19, 2008
  19. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Sounds reasonable enough doesn't it? Problem is the government already had enough powers to get the job done. We can't keep giving more power more funding and more control to an institution that has a history of abusing it every time it feels like slipping it's restraints. I'm talking about government in general now.

    The state always has a reasonable sounding reason for "needing" more power more funding and more control. Giving in to it whenever it starts whining about feeling it's restraints is neither conservative nor sane imho.


    I agree that may have been the way of it for awhile but now what I see are two types of socialism, national and international being merged under the auspices of globalism or a global corporate fascism.

    The political spectrum runs from 0% government, anarchy to 100% government, totalitarian. Most people think of fascism or national socialism as a rightie thing and communism or international socialism as a leftie thing. Spin it this way and that but they both end up being totalitarian at the same end of the political spectrum.

    The whole leftie vs rightie paradigm is just a waste of time as far as I'm concerned. I don't feel like I need to join the republican party to be against abortion and why should I need to be a democrat to disagree with corporatism?

    Bush is more a leftist BTW as internationalism is a leftie thing it's also a corporate thing. Guess they got the righties and lefties confused about what "side" they're on eh" That's why I'm usually purplexed and beffudled at the thought of all the proud self proclaimed righties here abouts going along with it. I suppose in their minds a perceived right wing NWO is better than a left wing NWO. Does it really matter if a global corporate totalitarian regime is leftie or rightie?

    I think probably not.

    Now you're getting back into the realm of mainstream consensus NS. This country was founded on principles based on the suspicion of government. The state and conglomerated corporate mass media have conditioned us over the years to think in opposition to those principles. It isn't un-natural or un- American to be suspicious of government NS it's our God given right and national heritage. Anyone who says different is trying to sell you a bum steer.:smilewinkgrin:
     
    #39 poncho, May 19, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 19, 2008
  20. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, that is one part of it; the degree to which people inside government, and out, feel the need to control others. But the other thread relates to what types of behavior people want to restrict, and that is where classifying people as left or right comes in. You say it's a waste of time, but really, that's what politics is all about. Whose vision gets to prevail?

    Yep, Bush is really a garden-variety American centrist, pre-Woodstock you might say.


    And on that note, I abandon the field. For now.
     
Loading...