Mistake or Advanced New Revelation?

So also do they prohibit giving the website link which you included (check the moving banner).

Actually these prohibitions are not exactly settled for internet use. Quotations can be used given certain restrictions if you cite the name of the work and author. I believe it must be less than a paragraph at the moment.

Other wise you can add the word “that” and give the statement.

For example: On page 12 of Dr Ruckman’s book Problem Texts he says that the blah, blah is yada yada.

HankD

 

While I don't agree with Ruckman or his teachings, I do have to respect his wishes regarding his concerns for unauthortized use of his work. I will leave it to the moderators if they would like to delete my previous post with his teachings on "advanced relvelations".

 

mesly: 'While I don't agree with Ruckman or his teachings, I do have to respect his wishes regarding his concerns for unauthortized use of his work. I will leave it to the moderators if they would like to delete my previous post with his teachings on "advanced relvelations".'

Ruckman's personal wishes to the contrary, his material _is_ posted *publicly*, and from that point on becomes subject to the "fair use" clause of US copyright law. No reason why the short excerpted quotes cannot stay right where they are.

I suspect the only reason he tries to insist that no one else can ever quote him is fear of ridicule and embarrassment over the nonsense contained within his material.

 

You're right, Ziggy. I came home to late to make that point. I'm glad someone else realized that and posted it. Thanks!

AVL1984

 

Ziggy and AVL1984, I just don't want to get the BB in trouble. Its hard to figure out just what Ruckman would do

 

HankD said:

So also do they prohibit giving the website link which you included (check the moving banner).

Actually these prohibitions are not exactly settled for internet use.

Legal controversy over linking centres around "deep linking," that is, linking to pages other than the top-level page of a site. Merely linking to a home page is a non-issue.

I believe it must be less than a paragraph at the moment.

No such restriction exists on the length of the excerpt. If someone were to litigate over an excerpt from one of his works, it would be up to the courts to decide whether it consitituted an infringement or not.

 

mesley, I don't believe he would have any grounds to try legal action against the BB, especially considering he has done the same and far more.

AVL1984

 

mesly: "Ziggy and AVL1984, I just don't want to get the BB in trouble. Its hard to figure out just what Ruckman would do."

Remind me to get one of those WWRD? bracelets....

Short answer is that Ruckman won't do anything, and can't do anything, since fair use is by definition *not* infringement. If he doesn't want the nonsense he posts publicly to be commented on by the public, then he should simply stop posting anything on the internet, stop writing books, stop publishing his BBBulletin, and perhaps even stop preaching and teaching.

Come to think of it, that wouldn't be all that bad an idea.....

It might stop all the libel and slander that emanates continually from his written and spoken material....

 

His minions are not ashamed to invade the BB with his doctrine. You can indirectly "quote" him until the "cows come home".

Again, phrase it like this "on page 20 of his book Secrets from 1611 Ruckman claims that the Holy Spirit was behind the scenes inspiring mistakes in the AV1611...".

The book name Secrets from 1611 and the quote are fictional (so far).

HankD