More squealing from the porcine one

If you're not just a one issue voter then it is ok. When other issues come into play it is ok to sacrifice the lives of innocent unborn children by means of sucking them apart with a disgusting vacume creating the most inhuman scenario that makes Hitler look like a playground bully.

 

I do not support baby killers regardless of their political stripe.

 

Voting for those who do is supporting of them to be sure.

 

Unless I have unknowingly done so I have never supported anyone who supports baby killers.

 

Ummm....Obama does:thumbs:

 

No, Senator Obama does not, your faulty semantics notwithstanding.

 

Obama supprots abortion on demand. It is you who is taking part in faulty semantics.

 

Not at all. You use one type of argument about causation in the thread about Pastor Wright in the News Forum and then use the opposite argument here in the Poltics forum. Your whole way of debating in this section of the board is faulty. Your style reminds me of a boxer with both eyes swelled shut from blows who is swinging wildly with no aim.

 

Give me a break. The two arguments and the two issues are not even close. You know it and I know it.

 

A very weak dodge - but expected.

 

Yes, Obama does support abortion on demand. He supports the killing of innocent babies. You Obama supporters can't spin your way around that.

 

You McCain supporters can't prove that because it is not true.

 

so apparenlty you have missed his public statements that he supports abortion on demand.

 

Saying that the government should stay out of the abortion issue for the most part does not mean that one supports killing babies. The only people responsible for killing babies are the mothers who consent to having an abortion and the doctors who consent to performing abortions.

 

Wrong. He actually supports abortions. He does not, in fact, stop at simply keeping the government out of it. Ron Paul does take that position. Obama goes further than that.Talk about semantics.

 

Good effort at rationalization, but still a failure.

Your glass house has been shattered by your support of a baby killer.

 

Prove it, if you can.

 

Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.


(But please don't throw any sticks or stones. :laugh: )

 

He supports Roe v. Wade, partial birth abortion.

Enough said.

 

Saying that the government should stay out of those issues does not make one a baby killer - your faulty semantics notwithstanding.

Plenty enough said.