New "Bible" Version

Now that qualifies as a 'per-version'!!! No doubt about it!

 

Ruth should read Isaiah 45 - then she would understand that post-modern, pre-modern, whatever-modern - there is only one God - there are no others!

 

I don't think even any pseudo-Christians will recognize that garbage as a "bible".

 

I wonder when she stands before the Judgement Seat of Christ, if she will be able to utter anything more than, "Uuuh, uuuh, ooops!!"

 

Well, to say that makes my heart heavy is a gross understatement.

 

I read this at another site. This teacher will be held very acountable on Judgment Day James 3:1.
Faithgirl

 

Love how at the end of the story, WND is ready to sell you a video, bible and sign you up for a subscription for something.

Old fashion Universalism, with a gorilla twist

 

What would preclude someone from using the "doctrine of soul competency" to determine that this is a "valid version"?

 

Because a fundamental doctrine--Christology, the Incarnation--is changed (more like corrupted/violated/perverted).

 

Thank you for the response. Can you point me to a resource that elaborates on this and defines the rules such as you describe?

 

We can learn from...

• Several hundred years of translations of Scriptures (the process).
• What does Scripture teach us as most important?
• Church history and their dealings with what we would define as "heresy."

To summarize your question, you're asking (as I understand), "What doctrines, when misunderstood, become heretical?"

• Some scriptures are interpreted different ways; their differing interpretations do not strike at the heart of Christianity (i.e., "What exactly is a Leviathan?").
• Some scriptures, when interpreted carelessly or wrongly, strike at the heart of our faith and must be spoken against (i.e., Jehovah's Witnesses and their Christology).

I think I know where you're going with this...and keep in mind, you have no more scriptural justification for a KJVO belief than I do here. I would contend that what I'm saying is on much sturdier ground Biblically.

 

Pardon, I think there is a FUNDAMENTAL problem here.

We don't have a doctrine and attempt to find Scripture to support it.

We search the Scriptures to develop proper doctrine.

The problem here is that there is no support for the translation.

Rob

 

Is that a no?

 

BaptistBoard.com > Baptist DEBATE Forums (Baptist Only) > Bible Versions/Translations

You are being judgemental and it is righteous judgement. It's an obvious heretical "bible", others are more subtle.

 

I am honestly trying to understand your positions. When I say a modern version is corrupt I hear things like the "soul competency doctrine" means that each individual can make a decision on which Bible(s) is/are truth. When you rail against this "Bible" I desire to understand what your position would be if someone said in my "soul competency" I find it to be acceptable, as I'm looking for a definitive explanation for this criteria to understand it better. Please forgive me if I offended you or messed up your thread.