News: Vince Foster's murder: Evidence to be revealed

This is very interesting. It reveals the marriage of the press and the government, considering how such an interesting and high-profile set of events can be swept under the rug.

Maybe John Ashcroft will do something about it (just kidding!).

 

Somehow I smell a rat here. For one thing Ken Starr had every incentive to reveal such a murder if there was one. Secondly, 10 years is a long time for this investigator to keep such information to himself, if he has solid evidence of a murder or coverup. I predict that this "new information" will be less than overwhelming.

 

Patrick Knowlton, the so-called eye witness, has been making a career out of the Vince Foster case. I think his information is suspect.

 

I plan to wait until indictments are issued and people are convicted of a crime. I thought that was the American way.

 

Well, what's the word? The 20th came and went.
Gina

 

Ya know, I get really upset when I use a vending machine and press the wrong button. Maybe he really wanted chips and was out of change.
I say we use his past history of chip snacking to prove this is a possibility.
Gina

 

>>>>>>Gina, if you follow the link you can read the media release. Seems to me the man just repeated old information. I believe Vince Foster was murdered but I saw no new evidence that I haven't heard for years.<<<<<

That is more or less what I predicted after your first post, that there would be nothing new. The fact that they tried to make it appear that they had something new, when they did not, calls into question their integrity from the very beginning. It may well be that Vince Foster just committed suicide - which is what all of the official investigations have concluded, even those done by enemies of Bill Clinton.

Diane, you may believe Vince Foster was murdered, but there is very little evidence to support that. I prefer to accept the conclusions of the duly authorized authorities, rather than theories from questionable sources. And there is reason to believe, for the reasons that I have stated, that this particular source, that you quoted, is not credible.

 

Whether Mr. Foster killed himself or not is something we will probably never be able to prove. The fact is Clinton sullied the Oval Office with his infidelity, was responsible for depleting the military prowess of our nation and attempted to push governmental control over a large portion of our nation's economy with his failed health care scenario. Those facts are more troubling to me than Mr. Foster's untimely passing.

 

There is a lot of mystery surrounding the VF case. Not the least of which is Hillary and her cronies allegedly interfering with a federal investigation by rifling through Fosters office before investigators had a look at it. Every profiler and criminal analyst I've heard says that Fosters behavior before the alleged suicide does not fit the behavior of the majority profile. Which does not in itself imply that there was any wrongdoing in that there are always exceptions to the rule. The fact that there many ommisions of credible evidence pointing to a homicide including that principal investigators, in their original report stated that Foster appeared to be alone, although other officers at the scene reported that there were what appeared to be motorcycle tracks in close proximity to where foster was found. I think that of all the alleged Clinton scandals that this one is probably the most viable.

 

Tell you the truth, so much went on during the Clinton administration in terms of scandal that I could barely keep track of it all. Off the top of my head I do believe that Hillary did have some documents considered to be pertinent to the investigation but ended up turning them over to investigators (sans any potentially incriminating evidence of course). And that in itself would constitute an obstrudtion of justice charge for you and i but they are the elite and as such can get away with more. Fair -no but reality. There have been plenty of books written about the alleged missdeeds of the Clintons during their reign a. If you're interested in learning more then I would suggest doing a search of conspiracy theory sites many of which have sections devoted to the Clintons. The information on such sites is always in question but nontheless some are based on bits of factual data that can be verified through other more credible sources. It might be a place to start.

 

Diane,

Your linking to the rubbish about dead friends of Bill Clinton is merely the spreading of false and slanderous gossip in a situation where you have zero evidence. It is a very un-christian thing to do. I am no friend of Bill Clinton, but spreading such tripe is far worse in my opinion than any of the immoral things Clinton is accused of.

 

Doesn't the Bible say that it's ok if you're doing it to a Democrat? Peter, don't expect to get an answer.

 

I'm having trouble understanding the rules. It seems that it is alright to make unsubstantiated accusations against a former Democratic President, but it is not alright to even question the motives or actions of a current Republican President.

I would expect that a Christian would at least be fair and consistent. I guess not.

 

The belief in and the spreading of gossip about the dead men supposedly connected to Bill Clinton is a good test of intelligence and character. If anyone believes that trash, it shows they are not very intelligent and if they spread the information, it shows reflects badly on their character. In fact, you could make up a similar list of dead friends connected to just about anyone of Clinton's age and stature. It means nothing at all and is pure rubbish. Anyone with an I.Q. above 90 should be able to understand that.

 

Yeah, but I noticed you took care to state you're not his friend.
One has to admit that's a rather interesting and long list.

Terry, Bush is being bashed by demos and reps alike in another thread. There ya go, consistancy.
*I* would expect a Christian would at least be...Republican!
Gina