Featured Notes in the Margins of Your Bible

How didi he cast doubt upon the text, as he held to an inerrant/infallible bible, correct?

 

Actually I am going to say something nice about Scofield which many dispensationalists will not like. Classic dispensationalism teaches that the Church was not revealed in the Old Testament. However, in the original Scofield bible in the intro to the Song of Solomon Scofield says that one possible interpretation of the Song is the love of Jesus Christ for the Church. Now that Intro has been removed from later editions since it is somewhat embarrassing what Ryrie calls the sine qua non of classic dispensationalism

 

Thompson was a Methodist and went on to serve under Pentecostal Evangelist Aimee Semple McPherson at her L.I.F.E. Bible College:

The Bridal Call Foursquare magazine, April 1928, p. 16 "Foursquare Book Shoppe"

 

http://www.localchurchbiblepublishers.com/2011/06/mid-size-note-takers/

I preach out of one of these. I probably have around 15 sermons in it right now, I no longer bring paper notes to a pulpit with me. I love it.

 

From my understanding there are different scofield bibles, some of the newer editions change and mess with the original notes scofield put out.

 

ALL of those involved with the revisions like new Scofield 1967, were commited to Dispy theology, so any editing would have been for more progressive dispy theology, updating/refining it!

 

I believe they are on the 4th edition!

 

Given they removed Scofield's intro to the Song of Solomon I doubt they were Progressive Dispensationalists. According to Ryrie the progressives are rejecting one of the the sine qua non of classic dispensationalism which is two different peoples of God.

 

again, progressive dispy like myself see ONE people of God, jews and gentiles today saved by grave, by Jesus, and that it is ONLY when Church is raptured, THEN national isreal gets dealt with again, as under Holy Spirit move as He didi in OT times!

 

He accused the translators of error, throughout.
He often stated that the "oldest and best mss were not available" when, ....blah,blah, blah.
He didnt believe the AV was inerrant, that's for sure.

You obviously have a bias, or you wouldnt have asked that.

 

The queen of pre-trib cRapture mythology, outstanding!
If you ever get caught in adultery, just claim you were abducted by Mexicans.

 

Thin the real authors were DR Jesus/Paul!

 

I was talking about Aimee the 4 square false prophetess.

 

agree with you on her as being a fraud and fake!

 

thought he meant it "in jest", as like me recommending the RC Sproul bible to a fervent arminian!

 

It is a real experience looking inside a Dake Bible. If you look long enough you may find Scripture in the midst of the notes. Sort of like the Tale of the Ancient Mariner: Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink! I will leave it to your imagination to make the connection!

 

Fake was NOT giving any real biblical truth and understanding in His study notes, pity is many Charasmatics look as his notes as being almost another edition of sacred text!

 

I have known a few Baptists who look at Scofield's notes the same way!

 

I actually have a Dake's Annotated Study Bible. It's actually NOT that bad, imo. I like the greek/hebrew in the margin.