1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Obama: Will discard Bush Exec. Orders He deems *unconstitional*

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by LadyEagle, May 23, 2008.

  1. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Perhaps, but not nearly so unhappy as with Obama.
     
  2. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    At least McCain has enough sense to pretend to be one of "us".
     
    #22 poncho, May 24, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 24, 2008
  3. JustChristian

    JustChristian New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    What's been far scarier is having GW Bush as President for the last 7 1/2 years. Many of his executive orders were flagrant if not unconstitutional. I hope that whoever wins the election will remove every trace of the worst president in American history.
     
  4. ajg1959

    ajg1959 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    That would be Bill Clinton.

    AJ
     
  5. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    7,727
    Likes Received:
    873
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The rapture has got to be close -- I am in total agreement with Poncho on this one!:thumbs::laugh:

    Sure there will be pockets that resist, but the overwhelming majority of the citizens ( just observe the fanatical support of BHO on this board of folk who should have some similance of discernment) will fall all over themselves to be a part of his adoring entourage.

    support of BHO on this board
     
  6. billwald

    billwald New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    2
    THE POINT SHOULD BE that the US is governed by secret laws and orders, NOT the Constitution.
     
  7. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Agreed.

    Yep.
     
  8. LeBuick

    LeBuick New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    1
    I thought this was standard to at minimum ammend or not overturn them... In fact, presidents ammend their own orders as time go by. Bush had one to create a fund to defend Iran but I believe he overturned it himself.

    If you look at Bush' executive orders you will see there is nothing to worry about.

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/orders/
     
  9. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sure there is. You can't compare Obama's EOs with the Bush EOs, especially on foreign policy, where they are apparently polar opposites, for one. Obama is pro-abortion. Bush's stance has been pro-life. Granted, there are a lot of things a President cannot do without approval from Congress, but in the case of Martial Law and Executive Orders, as Commander in Chief, he has all power and there is nothing citizens or Congress can do about it. The military/National Guard will do as they are given orders to do, because that's the way we train them.

    Okay, leave the Muslim equation out of it. That still doesn't mean there no danger here, just look at the 20 years under Black Liberation Theology and Jeremiah Wright and the hatred spewed for America and take that scenario out to the extremes under EOs.

    What I'm saying is that just because presidents in the past have not abused the EO privilege, doesn't mean that a new one won't, especially one who has risen out of nowhere with some big socialist backing, a Senate record that shows indifference to responsibility (by voting Present) and life (his pro-abortion stance and statements), his public statements about foreign policy, his liberal ideology, and his 20 years of influence under Jeremiah Wright, and there could be a lotta big trouble afoot!
     
    #29 LadyEagle, May 24, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 24, 2008
  10. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hardly. James Buchannan, probably.
     
  11. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    Since this is a "What if" thread as proposed in the OP....

    What if President Clinton use executive orders to declare a feminist state? She might be Nora Clavicle in disguise.

    Compelling story here


    On topic, BTW, IMHO, this is about as likely as President Obama uses his executive power to legalise all abortions or declaring same s*x marriage legal.

    Thank you LE for talking the Muslin America topic out of the conversation.
     
    #31 NaasPreacher (C4K), May 25, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 25, 2008
  12. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nonsense poncho. People are not in a frenzy about possible terror attacks here, and are complaining about what few security procedures they have to endure (long lines at the airport). There is no call for a more authoritarian government. There are no riots in the streets. GI's are not about to open fire on any group of peaceful protestors. Worldwide, terrorist attacks are down 40% from seven years ago. And we are shortly going to have another peaceful change of administration.
     
  13. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    You are 100% correct - it is still a good country.
     
  14. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Darn right. People just get carried away on these boards.
     
  15. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ain't it the truth! Even in the contested results of 2000, there were no tanks in the streets, no bloodlettting, and we had a peaceful transition to a new government.
     
  16. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    That is so MP. Not even a bloody nose! Well maybe a few.
     
  17. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Really?

    Yeah but for the most part people are accepting a big brother authoritarian government. You seem to be okay with it.

    Not from the people at this time anyway. The state however is always ready and willing to grab more power. It's a historical fact and one of the main reasons this nation was founded on the principles it was.

    If there were would they be given any airtime?

    We can be thankfull for that but the state has been training foreign troops on American soil to do the dirty work for a long time now. You should really keep up with this stuff NS. It's kind of a drag trying to have a debate with a half educated opponent. No offense meant mind you.

    Look back to NOLA after Katrina. Foreign troops and mercenaries on American soil. Confiscation of peaceful citizens firearms. FEMA cutting communication lines and holding up needed goods and supplies from reaching the people. It goes on. Me thinks y'all forget these "little things" to quickly.

    This is a good thing but how does it prove it that I am wrong about people rallying behind a man on a white horse? This is a given response proven over and over when's the last time you cracked open a real history book? National and international leaders know this and openly admit it. Why is it only the "common" people that deny it?

    Do I need to post quotes from the horse's mouths yet again?
     
    #37 poncho, May 25, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 25, 2008
  18. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Absolutely. The MSM loves nothing better than anti-Bush or anti-war demonstrations.

    Yep, foreign troops have indeed been trained on US soil. At the request of foreign governments for use in their own countries.

    Mexican troops brought mobile water treatment plants & kitchens to San Antonio to help. It was a kindly gesture, in the same way that US troops often enter foreign disaster zones to help.

    I know some history, I just don't rely on the same, ahem, sources as you.

    The point is that you alleged that we were just teetering on the edge of a facsist military takeover, and that the population would eagerly accept it. Really there is not much rational evidence to indicate any such thing.
     
  19. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Oh boy, here we go again.

    Wasn't to long ago there was this event in New York city called the RNC remember it? Hundreds of thousands protested but the media only showed a fraction of that. I listened to "live" radio broadcasts from this event. The police were setting up "dragnets" they imprisoned hundreds of protesters in an old bus garage...not to mention the "free speech zones".

    I could go through and give you the minute by minute but you'd just discount all the evidence as you normally do to shine a favorable light on the state's questionable activities so there isn't really much point.


    Strange from the videos I have seen they were dragging American citizens away to "camps" while they sreamed "I have rights, I have rights". How is it you keep missing all this? By choice or by accident?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gt2pQgW3wX8&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=932Zu4e4iVM&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G25JiGMLxIA&feature=related



    Well, that's the official story anyway. Why the mercenaries? Why was FEMA cutting communications lines?
    No you completely overlook any "source" the establishment tells you to like the good citizen you are NS. I'm thinking you know a little social studies maybe. If you knew any history at all I wouldn't have to tell about the "man on the white horse" ploy.

    And you say you know some history??? Do you have to work hard at being so naive or does it come natural? Have you forgotten how hard Bush campaigned for "martial law" powers??? Habeas corpus has been repealed, Posse comitatus for all intents and purposes is dead and all the police state legislation that is now in place staring right in the face and yet you say there is "not much rational evidence to indicate any such thing"???

    What planet are you living on NS? Because is sure isn't planet earth. Planet head in the sand maybe but not this one.

    Incredible.
     
  20. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Perhaps you haven't read the news about the Crown Heights issue this past month. My take is that if Obama is not chosen as the Democratic nominee, there will be riots in the streets of America from people of color who say they are disenfranchised (Democratic party has painted itself into a corner over Obama with this underlying threat of violence in the streets and they probably realize it) - the riots of Watts repeated in city after city through the US based upon race.

    But they could be called to do so if martial law was declared.
    Research on Google does not show that statement to be true.
    And this thread is about what happens after the peaceful change of administration, should Obama be elected POTUS.
     
Loading...