1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Pakistan is the next battlefield.

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by El_Guero, Feb 17, 2007.

  1. El_Guero

    El_Guero New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,714
    Ratings:
    +0
  2. Bartimaeus

    Bartimaeus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2002
    Messages:
    909
    Ratings:
    +0
    Pakistan

    Islam is the issue. The battlefield is where ever it is believed and preached.

    Bartimaeus
     
  3. Daisy

    Daisy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Ratings:
    +0
    They got nukes - I doubt we'll risk that.
     
  4. El_Guero

    El_Guero New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,714
    Ratings:
    +0
    "WE" aren't . . . YOUR team is . . .

    . . . the friendly neighborhood muslim terrorists are conducting terror bombings . . .

    . . . you know the kind that you have been calling 'civil' war . . .



     
  5. Daisy

    Daisy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Ratings:
    +0
    How dare you say that I am not on the American team, that I am on the terrorist team? That is a lie and an insult.


    Furthermore, the civil war is in Iraq which is nowhere near Pakistan.
     
    #5 Daisy, Feb 18, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 18, 2007
  6. El_Guero

    El_Guero New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,714
    Ratings:
    +0
    Daisy,

    Hiding behind blaming me for your statements is just not gonna win you any brownie points. I have not said that YOU are not on the 'American Team'. You have said (AD NAUSEUM) that the 'American Team' is to 'blame'.

    HOW DARE YOU blame the American Team for what Muslim terrorists are doing.

    That is a lie. That is IMHO awfully close to aiding and abetting the enemy.

    Giving moral support to a known enemy of the USA during a time of war . . . you know daisy . . . IMHO Lindbergh made some stupid mistakes, but when he realized that he was wrong and the enemy was the enemy - he apologized.

    For at least 2 years, you have argued for the opposition's POV.

    For at least 2 years, by blaming the allied side, you have looked the other way when terrorists have murdered civilians.

    For at least 2 years, by blaming the allied side, you have aided the enemy by providing moral support for their cause.

    I personally have never been for fighting to liberate a bunch of Muslims that do not have the guts to do it themselves.

    But, you continue to argue in support of the declared enemy of the USA.

    I honestly find that difficult to understand.



     
  7. Ps104_33

    Ps104_33 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2001
    Messages:
    4,005
    Ratings:
    +0
    The consequences of a pull-out

    Ignore this blank post
     
  8. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Ratings:
    +0
    Ignore this ignoration of your post ... :sleeping_2:
     
Loading...