1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Partial-Birth Abortion Defined

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by Artimaeus, Jun 17, 2004.

  1. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,536
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Did you miss Isaiah 1:18 which I included in my post?

    HankD
     
  2. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Even if Roe v Wade were to be overturned, there would be a significant number of abortions every year that would be available for stem cell research. The ban on stem cell research is silly, imo. It's a completely separate issue from the mainline abortion issue, imo.
     
  3. sdcoyote

    sdcoyote Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2004
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    13
    Hank - I was not directing my post to you, but to everyone in general. I was not accusing you of this. Sorry if I offended.
     
  4. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,536
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Not a problem! [​IMG]

    HankD
     
  5. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,491
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    When my wife was pregnant for the first time, she had complications. Her water broke, leaving the child (at that stage of development) with no chance for survival. We were living in Germany at the time, and under German law, they could do nothing, but wait for the unborn child to die, and miscarry.

    As traumatic as that was (it took a week in the hospital), I don’t know that having the fetus aborted would have been better. I think my wife believes it would have been less traumatic. Physically, it would have been. But taking that into our hands, even though we knew we had lost our child, may have been worse. I really don’t know.

    We are both against abortions, but I do understand medical necessities for abortions.

    9 years later we were again expecting a child (real rough pregnancy). The hospital advised amniocentesis (spelling?), and explained that the test carried minimal risk for the fetus. When we declined, we were counseled that the child could be born with downs syndrome, and the test would give us time for “options”. Options were defined as:

    1. Abortion
    2. No option, but you have the knowledge of the test result

    We declined. Anyway, what struck me was the pro-abortion stance taken by the hospital. I don’t understand why an unhealthy child’s life would be considered less valuable than a healthy child’s life. I think we both left the doctors office feeling sick that day.

    Anyway, we have a healthy baby boy (13 mos. old).
     
Loading...