Pelosi: Amend the First Amendment

Evil people with evil hearts vote in evil people with evil hearts and get what they deserve. The bible says it is reaping what we sow. The question is are we going to follow in her steps and vote in another evil administration that we think is less evil then the one we now have or keep the one we have now?

 

Amend or rescind the First (Prima Facie:The Most Important and therefore all others following behind it are suspect) Amendment?

Which is it?

Soon we will all have the right to SHUT UP and make bricks without straw and then be taxed for making the bricks as well (aka:The Cap and Trade Tax).

Wake up America - Nero is fidlin'.

Four more years?

HankD

 

AMEN & AMEN!!
​

Those who slept through the last election had better wake up this election - if we actually have an election - or this WILL be the last election!!!!!!

 

Good for Pelosi! You all agree, don't you?

 

What is she good for Bill?

 

Democrats are idiots.

 

Some less so than others.

Take the Blue Dog Democrats...

Uh...has anyone seen any Blue Dog Dems?

No?

Obama must've eaten them.:smilewinkgrin:

 

But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother [fn] will be liable to judgment; whoever insults [fn] his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, 'You fool!' will be liable to the hell [fn] of fire.

 

"Corporations as opposed to individuals"? How about unions also, "as opposed to individuals?"

 

When you single out any particular group -- corporations, unions, whites, blacks, whatever -- and tell them that simply because of their particular group, they don't have protections under the Constitution that everyone else does -- well, I'm not a constitutional law professor like Obama is, but I think there's a fundamental misunderstanding of the constitution.

I know they're trying to limit corporations being able to have a political viewpoint, because corporations will typically back the candidate that's friendlier to business (and that ain't the Democrats); but trying to justify it as corporations have an unfair advantage because they have money...well, we might as well say that whites (or blacks, or whatever group you want to use as an example) shouldn't be allowed to contribute to political causes because they're a majority and have an unfair advantage over the minority(ies).

 

>"Corporations as opposed to individuals"? How about unions also, "as opposed to individuals?"

OK with me.

 

Does anyone get the feeling that if this passes, the church could be next?

 

Yes.

HankD

 

Next for what? It is already illegal for a 501c3 to support a political candidate.

 

"Hate Crimes" so-called.

This is the first olive out of the bottle. It will trickle down to the individual.

In fact, it already has, 50 million have been silenced from their mother's womb.

HankD

 

I think its time to.....

.....AMEND Pelosi :smilewinkgrin: