1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Pelosi: Amend the First Amendment

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by mandym, Apr 19, 2012.

  1. mandym

    mandym New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/pelosi-amend-first-amendment
     
  2. mandym

    mandym New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/citizens-united-founder-posse-radicals-want-overturn-first-amendment
     
  3. freeatlast

    freeatlast New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Ratings:
    +0

    Evil people with evil hearts vote in evil people with evil hearts and get what they deserve. The bible says it is reaping what we sow. The question is are we going to follow in her steps and vote in another evil administration that we think is less evil then the one we now have or keep the one we have now?
     
  4. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    16,376
    Ratings:
    +1,312
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Amend or rescind the First (Prima Facie:The Most Important and therefore all others following behind it are suspect) Amendment?

    Which is it?

    Soon we will all have the right to SHUT UP and make bricks without straw and then be taxed for making the bricks as well (aka:The Cap and Trade Tax).

    Wake up America - Nero is fidlin'.

    Four more years?

    HankD
     
    #4 HankD, Apr 20, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2012
  5. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    5,655
    Ratings:
    +131
    Faith:
    Baptist
    AMEN & AMEN!!
    Those who slept through the last election had better wake up this election - if we actually have an election - or this WILL be the last election!!!!!!
     
  6. billwald

    billwald New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Ratings:
    +0
    Good for Pelosi! You all agree, don't you?
     
  7. freeatlast

    freeatlast New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Ratings:
    +0
    What is she good for Bill?
     
  8. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    21,777
    Ratings:
    +1,281
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Democrats are idiots.
     
  9. Arbo

    Arbo Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Ratings:
    +1
    Some less so than others.

    Take the Blue Dog Democrats...

    Uh...has anyone seen any Blue Dog Dems?

    No?

    Obama must've eaten them.:smilewinkgrin:
     
  10. freeatlast

    freeatlast New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Ratings:
    +0
    But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother [fn] will be liable to judgment; whoever insults [fn] his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, 'You fool!' will be liable to the hell [fn] of fire.
     
  11. Alcott

    Alcott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    7,648
    Ratings:
    +328
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "Corporations as opposed to individuals"? How about unions also, "as opposed to individuals?"
     
  12. Don

    Don Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,675
    Ratings:
    +558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    When you single out any particular group -- corporations, unions, whites, blacks, whatever -- and tell them that simply because of their particular group, they don't have protections under the Constitution that everyone else does -- well, I'm not a constitutional law professor like Obama is, but I think there's a fundamental misunderstanding of the constitution.

    I know they're trying to limit corporations being able to have a political viewpoint, because corporations will typically back the candidate that's friendlier to business (and that ain't the Democrats); but trying to justify it as corporations have an unfair advantage because they have money...well, we might as well say that whites (or blacks, or whatever group you want to use as an example) shouldn't be allowed to contribute to political causes because they're a majority and have an unfair advantage over the minority(ies).
     
  13. billwald

    billwald New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Ratings:
    +0
    >"Corporations as opposed to individuals"? How about unions also, "as opposed to individuals?"

    OK with me.
     
  14. LillyoftheValley

    LillyoftheValley New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2012
    Messages:
    80
    Ratings:
    +0
    Does anyone get the feeling that if this passes, the church could be next?
     
  15. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    16,376
    Ratings:
    +1,312
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes.

    HankD
     
  16. billwald

    billwald New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Ratings:
    +0
    Next for what? It is already illegal for a 501c3 to support a political candidate.
     
  17. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    16,376
    Ratings:
    +1,312
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "Hate Crimes" so-called.

    This is the first olive out of the bottle. It will trickle down to the individual.

    In fact, it already has, 50 million have been silenced from their mother's womb.

    HankD
     
  18. righteousdude2

    righteousdude2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    10,705
    Ratings:
    +379
    Faith:
    Baptist
Loading...