1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Petition for Constitutional Amendment

Discussion in '2003 Archive' started by Frogman, Mar 7, 2003.

Top Posters
  1. Frogman

    Frogman <img src="http://www.churches.net/churches/fubc/Fr

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2001
    Messages:
    5,492
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://www.wepledge.com/

    Above is a web-site dedicated to gathering 10,000 signatures to change our Constitution. At the site you will find the contents of the proposed amendment.

    What are your thoughts concerning the need of this; or even the legality of this proposed amendment in light of the 1st Amendment.

    Would this be a violation or not? What do you think?

    I believe this would violate the Constitution and I also believe it is unnecessary.

    God Bless.
    Bro. Dallas
     
    #1 Frogman, Mar 7, 2003
  2. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,852
    Likes Received:
    1,085
    Faith:
    Baptist
    By definition it would be constitutional, because it's a proposed amendment to the constitution.

    Is it wise? I don't think so. How would courts balance the First Amendment contradiction of this new amendment?

    The constitution should not be amended for trivial matters, and I consider this one.
     
    #2 rsr, Mar 8, 2003
  3. Baptist Believer

    Baptist Believer Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    787
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I think it is a very poor idea that will erode religious liberty.
     
    #3 Baptist Believer, Mar 8, 2003
  4. Frogman

    Frogman <img src="http://www.churches.net/churches/fubc/Fr

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2001
    Messages:
    5,492
    Likes Received:
    0
    By definition it would be constitutional, because it's a proposed amendment to the constitution.

    I didn't consider this when I posted. But I meant this would be a contradiction to the First Amendment.

    Bro. Dallas
     
    #4 Frogman, Mar 9, 2003
  5. go2church

    go2church Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,304
    Likes Received:
    6
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Bad idea! What happens when enough people get together and amend the constitution to outlaw Christianity?

    Freedom is not freedom if you are not allowed to have a dissenting point of view
     
    #5 go2church, Mar 9, 2003
  6. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Pledge as it is now is not unconstitutional. Also, the pledge has changed several times since its inception. So I see no reason to protect the pledge any more than it already is.
     
    #6 Johnv, Mar 10, 2003
  7. Alliswell

    Alliswell New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    If those doing the litigating against Christian free exercise would just quote the whole amendment, there would be no problem.

    There has been a lot of prohibiting the free exercise thereof!, by judges!
     
    #7 Alliswell, Mar 11, 2003
  8. stubbornkelly

    stubbornkelly New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,472
    Likes Received:
    0
    Useless amendment, designed to make something that is, indeed, unconstitutional (as a piece of government sponsored material), constitutionally protected. Rubbish. I think this'll be like the "flag desecration" amendment -- a failure.
     
    #8 stubbornkelly, Mar 11, 2003
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Loading...