Featured Politics in Bible translation

You are correct with Justin, the first theologian politician.
One my wife told me yesterday: Man, Yesterday I saw a politician with his hands in his own pockets, it was so cold.

If it was a theologian politician, he would have seen the man ripping out another's heart to divine Sunday.

About Barnabas you haven't got a clue what he is saying.

 

An <<OBVIOUS truth>> in this is a not fully rehabilitated SDA scoffing at his addiction and recovery at once.

 

I take exception as a Christian : <<<ANY Saturday Resurrection garbage>>>.

Nevertheless there are "ALL THE SCRIPTURES" many centuries from before the first 500 years of Christianity as well as the New Testament Scriptures from the first century of the first 500 years of Christianity.

Which ought to more than satisfy any true worshipper of the Lord of the Sabbath Day WHO WROUGHT and ACQUIRED LORDSHIP OF "LORD of the Sabbath Day" BY RESURRECTION FROM THE DEAD “ON THE SABBATH”.

Yes, so mighty was THIS DIVINE TRUTH of the SEVENTH DAY SABBATH RESURRECTION OF THE CHRIST OF GOD in and of ITSELF, that during the first one hundred years of Christianity the mightiest empire the world has ever seen as well as the ENTIRE WORLD, were conquered by it and were converted to its implementation for all order and arrangement in practical life that all its days and nights and WEEKS became ordered to its recurrence every “SABBATH-WEEK”.


It was not the “Sabbath-Week” of the Jews which became the title-day of the almanac and calendar of the whole world, but the Christian “Sabbath-Week” because it had the persuasive power of the knowledge of Christ’s Resurrection ON IT, which carried it across the world in such short time and has maintained it ever since.

In fact the Roman eight-day calendar gave in to the Christian “Sabbath-week” and even the Jewish “sevenths (shabua)-week” (in OT Greek the ‘hebdomos-week’) ceased vis a vis the POWER OF HIS RESURRECTION EVEN UPON THE DAY IN WHICH GOD FINISHED AND RESTED IN CHRIST IN RESURRECTION FROM THE DEAD.

 

RCC invented Islam. Has become most fruitful tool for RCC today.

Hidden in Vatican vaults is MUCH evidence against the RCC. Only evidence destroyed by the RCC has been more . . . erased from the face of the earth.

So the RCC fancied her theories could never be disproved. She has made large sums of money lecturing her untruths --- especially through bogus translations of the Bible sold by the billions.

All Christianity so dearly loves the RCC because their holy Sunday is completely founded on passages of Scriptures perverted by her and her lackeys.

Now, could you please share with me PROOF of Sunday Resurrection in pure Scripture unadulterated by your mother church?

Seeing it was so clear from the Scriptures that Christ resurrected, quote, "on the Sabbath", why would not ALL believers without exception believe, quote, "the Sabbath's" Resurrection?

Because it is written, "they shall believe THE LIE"!

 

I gave you the evidence from your <<500 years of history>>; you haven't looked at it.

For me though, the first century up to <<96AD>> will do. In fact, I INSIST.

And it is you here who keep on vomiting and regurgitating <Rivera>. I have not mentioned him, you did and still do.

 

Now go read the full details of each one in the complete, sola, Scriptures on the thread 'Ten visits to the tomb', http://www.baptistboard.com/showthre...=1#post2218866
THAT HAS BEEN WHAT all Christians have been reading throughout the <<500 years of history>> about which you demand from me to be informed. Christians have been reading nothing else and nothing different since the Gospels were written until one century ago, in the first century already in New Testament Greek, later also in Latin, and since Wycliffe and Tyndale et al in English as well. Throughout these eras spanning the whole Christian history, they read—quoting you, <<<of Saturday Resurrection trash>>> in nothing but the Scriptures, New and Old Testaments. Until the Roman Catholic church caught up and the trouble began and the corruptions began which you so enthusiastically defend like are you the pope’s most loyal serf.

 

Your fallacies denied,

In the Scriptures Old and New Testaments we have a Sabbath Resurrection
Outside Scriptures the only record of Sunday Resurrection in the second century is Justin the politician theologian.
Sabbath Resurrection deposited in all calendars of the first and second millennia AD.

You, may as well believe Mary was assumed into heaven as the Quran tells because there is as little historical evidence for that belief as for your superstitious belief of Biblical evidence for a Sunday Resurrection.

The 'best' and oldest and most conspicuous RCC politics in Bible perversion is that which you pretend not to see ---of course, because that's the political game in false Christianity.

 

Re:
<<<Show us the FIRST mention of Saturday Resurrection in history outside scriptures.>>>

The first mention of a Sunday Resurrection in history outside the Scriptures, was Justin as you know. The only name in nearly two hundred years.

The first MENTION was the first CORRUPTION as direct and blatant as was possible for only a theologian politician, and, if you have the Scriptures and can read them in Greek, as direct and blatantly CORRUPT as impossible not to see and break both one's legs to stand on, over it.

IF ONE HAD THE SCRIPTURES.
But scarcely anybody had the Scriptures in those days and scarcely anybody could read them for themselves. So Saint Justin had a free hand in his underhanded dealings with the kings of the kingdom of darkness.
Writing letters to Caesars is not writing Letters to the Church of Christ. But if you choose to attach greater authority to politicians’ rhetoric, it’s up to you.

So, for <<<the FIRST mention of Saturday Resurrection in history outside scriptures.>>>.

You referred to Barnabas and Ignatius. Ja, naturally at the hand of Sunday worshipping wranglers of simple reality. For your information, both believed Jesus’ Sabbath’s Resurrection.

The first true Christian martyr—Polycarp believed Sabbath Resurrection.

Irenaeus was a Sabbath Resurrection believer, because he was pro quarto-decimen.

The whole Greek or eastern part of Christianity to this day has been quarto-decimen and therefore has believed Jesus’ last passover was (as proclaimed in contemporary phraseology) “Crucifixion Thursday”, “Burial Friday” and “Resurrection Saturday”. You can google them in any year the fourteenth day of the month Nisan will fall on a Thursday.

The Serbian Orthodox Church the same. Their farok told me personally.

Before the great division caused Eastern and Western Catholicisms, the whole of Christianity were quarto-decimen and therefore believed the Sabbath’s Resurrection of Jesus.

The Celts were quarto decimen and Sabbath believers.

The Roman or Western catholic Church at the time of the split in the 13th century, was the minority who, because they have adopted the pagan Sunday instead of the ‘Jewish Sabbath’, wanted ‘Easter’ always to be on Fridays and ‘Resurrection Sunday’.

 

<<Quote (my) sources>>? You quoted them!

Re:
<<<the eighth day [Sunday or Saturday?]>>>

Neither, because in Barnabas’ letter, “the seventh day”—the Sabbath— symbolised “the eighth day”; not the First Day or Sunday.

Barnabas says “Jesus rose from the dead on the eighth day, and ascended into the heavens”, “on the eighth day” as well.

So, according to you Jesus rose on Sunday and, according to you, after forty days it was Sunday again when He ascended into heaven because you claim Sunday was Barnabas’ “eighth day”.
Or are you trying a joke on yourself?

 

Principle b