1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Pyramid Structure of Genesis 1, 2 and 3

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by Gerhard Ebersoehn, Feb 10, 2008.

  1. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Genesis 1,

    Days:-
    |.………1…|2……….…|3……………|4……………|5…………|…….…6…|
    1…….8a…|8b….…12|13…..…18|19…….22|23…..25|26……2:1
    --Text


    Genesis 2, Text and Days:-
    |4b………6|……………………………………………………………|7……….7|
    |...........|8………14|……………………………………………|15……18|
    \.....................................|19b……….|19a……|19c….25|
    |…….1…….|…….2…….|……………|…….4…….|……5……|……6……|
    Genesis 3:-............................................... |……7……|



    Genesis 3, Text Pyramid:-

    |......................................|19b……….|19a……|19c….25|
    |............|8………14|……………………………………………|15……18|
    |4b………6|…………………………………………………………..|7……….7|
    |…….1…….|…….2…….|……………|…….4…….|……5……|……6……|



    Days of Genesis 1, 2 and 3, Pyramid:

    Genesis 3
    |........................................................... |..... 7.....|
    |......1.... |.....2.... |..........Genesis 2.........|..... 6......|
    |.…….…1…|2……….…|3………….|4…………|5…………|…….…..6…|
    1……..8a…|8b….…12|13……18|19……22|23……25|26.....2:1…|
    It was evening and it was morning the ... Genesis 1

     
    #1 Gerhard Ebersoehn, Feb 10, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 10, 2008
  2. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    The Sabbath was the day of man's fall into sin.
     
  3. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Not even remotely true
     
  4. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    GE
    I made several mistakes while I was in a hurry with the English 'version' of my standpoint, so I'll post the Afrikaans tables - they are correct. From there one may take the discussion further.
     
  5. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Dae van Genesis 1, 2 en 3


    Genesis 1, Dae:-
    |.………1…|2……….…|3……………|4……………|5…………|…….…6…|
    1…….8a…|8b……12|13…..…18|19…….22|23…..25|26……2:1
    en teksplase “Dit was aand en dit was môre die ...”
    Sewende Dag: 2:2-3 / 4a




    Genesis 2, Teks en Dae:-
    |4b………6|………………………………………………………..|7……….7|
    |…………….|8………14|………………………………………..|15……18|
    |.……………………………….…………|19b………|19a
    ……|19c….25|
    |…….1……|…….2…….|……..……|…….4……|……5…..|……6
    …….|


    Genesis 3:- Sesde Dag: ………………………………….|….1-7….|
    .................Sewende Dag.……………………………|..8-24..|




    Genesis 2, 3 – Piramiede:-
    ......................Sewende Dag………………………….|3: 8-24|
    ………………….…………………………………………………………| 3: 1-7 |
    ...................................... |19b……….|19a……|19c….25|
    ……………..|8………14|……………………………………………|15……18|
    |4b………6|…………………………………………………………..|7……….7|
    |…….1……|…….2…….|…………..|…….4…….|……5…….|……6……|
     
    #5 Gerhard Ebersoehn, Feb 12, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 12, 2008
  6. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Post deleted

     
    #6 Gerhard Ebersoehn, Feb 12, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 12, 2008
  7. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    As is obvious, it was a big mistake saying the fall happened on the Sabbath. You know my standpoint from past discussions. I say the fall happened on the sixth day - the day of the creation of man: the same day. Then the Text UNINTERRUPTEDLY goes on to tell how God called for man in the garden - Afrikaans - "In the evening breeze", English, "cooel of day" (from, to deilinon / ruach).

    Scriptures - I don't care whatsoever what anybody whosoever says - Scriptures, make NO break between the Sixth and Seventh Days; Scriptures gives NO 'history' other than man's creation and fall in paradise. God 'rested' the Seventh Day in that He made provision for sin on it, and on the Seventh Day, conquered over sin and death through the Lamb - symbolically through the blood God took for life there and then - not long afterwards.
     
  8. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    My standpoint is built upon a vertical following-up of the three 'stories' of Genesis 1 to 3; I don't arranged them linearly. The repeated references to the SAME days of the ONE creation in the three chapters are undeniable. Their sequence is the very same of Genesis one.

    That's the one 'issue'.

    But of interest also is the devision of the days of 'creation-week' - or the first six specifically, whereby the Sixth Day belonged to the creation of man only, and wasn't 'shared with the creation of animals (created on the Fifthe Day).
     
  9. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Sorry, the table collapsed!
     
  10. donnA

    donnA Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    And did you come up with this yourself, is it supported by theologians?
     
  11. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    GE
    Why do you ask such a worthless question. I do! But their support is nothing! It is what the Bible teaches that matters. I refuse to answer your question!
     
  12. EdSutton

    EdSutton New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is not one particle of Scripture that supports this conjecture!

    Ed
     
  13. EdSutton

    EdSutton New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    A "house of cards" will usually collapse of its own weight, in the slightest breeze.

    Ladies and Gentlemen, I offer Exhibit "A". :rolleyes:

    Ed
     
  14. EdSutton

    EdSutton New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is also not one particle of Scripture to suggest the fall of man happened "on the sixth day - the day of the creation of man:".

    We simply are not told when this did occur, only that it did occur, and sometime after Adam and Eve were around.

    Conjecture is still conjecture, and it makes little difference whether it is yours, mine, or another's. That does not change its nature.

    Ed.
     
  15. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    that's what I said on page 1
     
  16. EdSutton

    EdSutton New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    I saw that afterwards, but I had responded as I came to the posts, so had not gotten as far as your response, at that time.

    Ed
     
  17. donnA

    donnA Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hummm, your attitude answers for you.
     
  18. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Ed Sutton:
    "There is also not one particle of Scripture to suggest the fall of man happened "on the sixth day - the day of the creation of man:".

    We simply are not told when this did occur, only that it did occur, and sometime after Adam and Eve were around.

    Conjecture is still conjecture, and it makes little difference whether it is yours, mine, or another's. That does not change its nature."

    GE
    My dear friend Ed Sutton, I return your question with gratitude, You, my friend or foe it matters not, give me, 'one particle of Scripture to suggest', the fall of man happened any time after, "on the sixth day - the day of the creation of man".

    Next, 'one particle of Scripture to suggest' that, or why, "We simply are not told when this did occur"

    since especially, you propose the indubatable notion, "only that it did occur, and sometime after Adam and Eve were around".

    Waht would make the 'sometime after' another day or year or century 'later'?

    'My' idea is to show how the whole Bible, Genesis 1-3 included, is the story of Redemption; and not even in purpose of creation firstly or independently



    We simply are not told when this did occur, only that it did occur, and sometime after Adam and Eve were around, and that 'given', is the story of the creation of the Sixth and Seventh Days.
     
    #18 Gerhard Ebersoehn, Feb 16, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 16, 2008
  19. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    But the nexus of both your and BobRyan's 'argument', is tradition - which tradition the nexus of is 'free-will' error: Arminianism, namely IMPROVEMENT on God's work 'very well done'. In other words, Adam first had to 'develop' into a 'mature' being before he could be able 'to make decision'. Now I don't know if I'm correct, but I thought you were a free-grace man, and not a 'free-will' man. Your standpoint here, reveals perhaps more than you bargained for.
     
  20. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Having given you then the first three chapters of Scriptures, I am the only one who could present that little bit necessary and totally ample Scripture, and you have left yourself / ves in the lurch without any provision. You get out of the ditch by yourself: You evidently should have the necessary equipment, since Adam your forebear was equiped to have made the right decision if only he tried hard enough.
     
Loading...