1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Regarding Time...

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by humblethinker, May 23, 2012.

  1. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28
    The biggest problem any of us has in regards to time(when did it start), is that we are finite beings, with finite minds, trying to understand God, One who is Infinite. None of us will truly be able to give an answer to suffice, since there are things(such as this subject, imho) that are just waaaaay over our heads.
     
  2. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    2
    Speak for yourself, I personally am omniscient.
     
  3. Benjamin

    Benjamin Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    8,423
    Likes Received:
    1,160
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I would note that to view the kind of relationship that is built upon “sequence” one must consider God’s nature, which is the Spirit of Love, Truth and a being of “aseity” (a self-derived infinite nature in and of itself that is “One” Being without a beginning); and is a Spirit that interacts with us (finite “created” beings), who He made in His image and likeness and gave us a physical mortal body as well.

    This Spirit from within Himself made a sacrifice in a promise, before the foundation of the world; this promise was given in the Spirit of Love and Truth to provide a “Way” for His creatures to be with Him, in Heaven for eternity, and there was a need to have a special “Way” to exist with man, to communicate with him, to interact and to allow for the immortal part of our being to have a relationship with Him forever. This “Way”, is described to us as being planned from the foundation of His creation and which involved a miraculous kind of transfiguration that was to provide a “Mediator” between God and man. In order to place this “Mediator” into the created world it is explained to us that God/One Holy Being gave His Only begotten to become a man in the world He created; still God, still One Being, but when time (creation of the world) began God spoke His Word into existence into the world He created, to the creatures He created, in the form of a man within that time. This was an event, it had a beginning, a period in which time for us began but for God who is unchanging I believe it was a beginning of the “Way” He would co-exist in time, a coming into the world in Truth, with the creatures He created which were subject to that time. He created us in time and to be subject to His judgment which is based on what we are responsible for in truth.

    I believe there was a need for this special “Way”, the need for a “Mediator” between God and man at the foundation of the world for Him to establish a relationship within time with His creatures. It would be very difficult to explain why He sacrificed His Son if it was not necessary to achieve these things. God is Truth, His Word is Truth, His offer of redemption is given in Love and in Truth, and if there was no need for the truth of this manifestation of God to come into the world in the way it did, to achieve a way of interaction with His creatures, then all this would be little more than an illusion to us, a world in which God designed down to the finest details for every event to happen exactly the way it does and of course that would include evil which would deny the truth of His nature. And what would be the purpose of a Mediator within time?

    That God interacts with us within time in truth is an essential for so many reasons especially in the reasoning that He brought His Word into the world in truth and that Word declares that He is Truth and that all His ways are judgment. What is righteous judgment without the truth of creaturely volition within time behind the action of creation and the beginning of time?

    That God existed before the creation of the world, before time began, is also essential because we are told in the Word that the world had a beginning and we know that God did not have a beginning.

    SO I believe there is a separation of God and time and also a “Way” that God exists within time. I believe that through His Trinitarian nature is how He achieves this feat. I believe He has a Trinitarian type of knowledge which allows for a type of “middle knowledge” if you will and just as it is miraculous that He came into the world as a man it is also true that He exists and interacts with us within time and yet is beyond time. He achieved everything He said He would and He did it in truth, how do I know, because I know he is Truth!

    Okay, my coffee is cold now…
     
  4. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28
    And how do you know you're all knowing? Who told you you was? Who gave you the permission to be all knowing? :laugh:
     
  5. HeirofSalvation

    HeirofSalvation Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,838
    Likes Received:
    128
    CARNAL HUMAN REASONING!!! THIS IS NOT OF GOD!!! YOU HAVE POSTED NO SCRIPTURES TO PROVE YOUR ASSERTIONS...MERE VAIN REASONINGS AND BABBLINGS!!!! GOD IS SOVEREIGN!!!

    Seriously, great post Ben! :wavey::thumbs::applause:

    We all have a cross to bear...
    2Ti 3:12 Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.
     
  6. humblethinker

    humblethinker Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    Barnes: That it cannot mean, literally, that there would be time no longer, or that the world would then come to an end absolutely, for the speaker proceeds to disclose events that would occur after that... No fair construction of the language, therefore, would require us to understand this as meaning that the affairs of the world were then to terminate.

    Clarke: That there should be time no longer - That the great counsels relative to the events already predicted should be immediately fulfilled, and that there should be no longer delay. This has no reference to the day of judgment.

    Gill: that there should be time no longer which is not to be understood of the cessation of time, and the swallowing of it up in eternity, at the end of all things, when it will be no more measured out by the revolutions of the sun and moon, which will then be no more; for this did not take place upon the angel's oath, or at the time this vision refers to; for after this,...

    Vincent: The meaning is not, as popularly understood, that time shall cease to exist, but that there shall be no more delay

    JFB: "that time (that is, an interval of time) no longer shall be." The martyrs shall have no longer a time to wait for the accomplishment of their prayers for the purgation of the earth by the judgments which shall remove their and God's foes from it (Re 6:11). The appointed season or time of delay is at an end. Not as English Version implies, Time shall end and eternity begin.[\b]

    Okay... how abooooouuuuuuttt...now?
    Dismissed?
     
  7. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    If you read my post for what it says, you would have seen in regards to time I'm not familiar to Augustine. I'm quite familiar with his other views, hence why I reject his stance on original sin :thumbs:
     
  8. humblethinker

    humblethinker Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are hilarious HoS! I like your shout out to God's sovereignty! :laugh::love2:
     
  9. humblethinker

    humblethinker Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    I read it... I'm glad we both agree.:thumbs: I found a few other big issues about what he believed that Calvinism seems to hang its hat on, but maybe in another thread...
     
  10. humblethinker

    humblethinker Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    0


    Curious... can you conceive of any relationship that is not built upon "sequence"?

    I'm glad to see you're back... How did your paper/test go? I always enjoy your contributions to the board.
     
  11. humblethinker

    humblethinker Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    If in the end, people appeal to our 'finiteness' and 'inability to understand' then why don't they simply assume that from the beginning and be a little less white-knuckled and a little more open-palmed about what they believe when talking to others who may believe differently?
     
    #51 humblethinker, May 24, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: May 24, 2012
  12. Benjamin

    Benjamin Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    8,423
    Likes Received:
    1,160
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thanks. I graduated from physical therapy school with honors, but I still need a college level math class of which I had to study for and pass a placement just to get into in order to complete my transcript and reflect that I am officially done so I can take the National Physical Therapy Exam. My transcript needs to be in the hands of the NPTE board by June 18…Soooo I am attempting to complete a 3-unit online math class in about 3 weeks…sigh! On that note:

    No, I cannot conceive a “true” relationship (value) between two beings that is not built on a sequence of something built on 2 parts. What “sequence” is there in instant determination? …without the “reality” of the existence of time? Take the emotion of love on which a relationship might be built. Love is a feeling that comes from within one being toward another being or object. 1 +1 = 2, or 2 is built on the relationship of 1 and 1. If 1 being did not have the “ability” to project that feeling toward another being we still have 1 – being placing (determining) His own feeling of love toward Himself. 1 + 0 = 1, or 1 only has relationship to itself and nothing. A sequence can not be built on 1 and nothing can it? 1 might consider that 1+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0…is a sequence, but it would be a sequence built on 1 and nothing. Love is something, or if it were nothing it has no value. Ain’t that right Quantum??? :laugh:
     
  13. HeirofSalvation

    HeirofSalvation Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,838
    Likes Received:
    128


    O.k. fine...have you now dismissed the sum total of my post based on this? I will concede Rev 10:6 at least for the sake of argument, and I may have misapplied it. There are still the passages in I John, and well, the rest of my argument. I am suggesting a majority orthodox view....
    1.)once there was not time,
    2.)God does not exist in time, at least prior and post creation.
    3.)God will eventually do away with time.

    You have appealed to authority to dispense with (one verse) of my post. I am now appealling to majority, tradition, and the sum total of the argument presented in the rest of my post for mine. Do you disagree?

    Unless I am mistaken, you have proposed that God has existed within time ALWAYS. This is a difficult position to defend and, quite frankly, seems absurd, in that, you contended that there have been a theoretical infinite sequence of events prior to creation? Am I mistaken about what you are contending? Please correct me if I am wrong.
     
  14. HeirofSalvation

    HeirofSalvation Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,838
    Likes Received:
    128
    All glory goes to God alone...it was determined by his own wise counsel and perfect pleasure from eternity past. ;)
     
  15. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    I have never seen DNA discussed in reference to Scripture or the Christian Faith?
     
  16. HeirofSalvation

    HeirofSalvation Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,838
    Likes Received:
    128
    In regards to "Christian Faith" I have. Directly refered to in Scripture...no, of course not. The fascinating thing about DNA as regards Christianity is that DNA is Information and thus Intelligence is implied in the creative act. I once heard a Christian philosopher belabour this in regards to John chapter 1..."In the beginning was the Word..." He then went on to talk about how that phrase in the Greek, understood at that time as it was, essentially meant law, order, information, intelligence et. al. A fascinating discussion really. The Man who taught it works with RZIM....The aplogetics ministry headed by Calvinist apologist Ravi Zacharias.
     
    #56 HeirofSalvation, May 24, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: May 24, 2012
  17. humblethinker

    humblethinker Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hos, have more faith in me than that! No, I have not dismissed your arguement based on that... please, I'm not like the others ;-)...

    Mine was an attempt to shortcut an arguement based on authorities we both would accept. I made the appeal because I was confident that the authorities based their opinions on scriptural and non-philosophical appraisal. We both agree that they are probably correct in their interpretation.

    You, however, are appealing to authorities that are largely basing their opinions on philosophical assumptions, inductions and deductions (I think this is the case, which is why I posted this thread). This is fine, just so long as we both acknowledge that philosophy is very influential in someone arriving at the opinion that God did or does not experience sequence, passage, duration, action, events, etc.

    For someone who believes in Molinism and you are appealing to tradition? C'mon, I figured that you knew your own opinion better than to make an appeal to tradition! j/k
     
  18. AresMan

    AresMan Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    11
    Faith:
    Baptist
    :thumbs:

    I would subscribe to the "ant-in-a-bubble" model of the universe based on relativity physics and the expansion of the universe. Time is not just a conceptual sequential relationship between events, but is a property of space itself, thus spacetime. Spacetime is not infinite; it is finite, but is not evenly distributed. It is "curved" but also "wrinkled" in places like a cloth.

    Time cannot be eternal or infinite just like space cannot be eternal or infinite. If God created all things, there can be nothing that is part of the material universe that exists outside creation.
     
  19. HeirofSalvation

    HeirofSalvation Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,838
    Likes Received:
    128
     
  20. humblethinker

    humblethinker Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    What about love? Would you define it as a 'thing' God created? What about 'relationship'? Is that a 'thing' God created? If so then do they exist outside the creation?
     
Loading...