1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Rev. 17:8--printer's error in Erasmus?

Discussion in '2005 Archive' started by Logos1560, Jun 17, 2005.

  1. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    17
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Along with Revelation 16:5, another reading in the KJV that Edward F. Hills identified as "certainly erroneous" was:

    "Rev. 17:8 'and yet is,' instead of 'and shall come.' (Uncorrected printer's error in Erasmus)"
    (BELIEVING BIBLE STUDY, p. 83).

    Was this a printer's error in Erasmus' Greek text and was it overlooked and kept in the later editions of the Textus Receptus and in the KJV?
     
  2. Ziggy

    Ziggy Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    580
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Logos: "Was this a printer's error in Erasmus' Greek text and was it overlooked and kept in the later editions of the Textus Receptus and in the KJV?"

    The TR reading KAIPER ESTIN ("and yet is"), which does *not* appear in any manuscript, patristic, or versional witness, seems to have been a one-letter corruption (very likely a typesetter's error, given the absence of any other evidence) from the known reading KAI PARESTIN ("and is present"), found in approximately 40 MSS and as a scholium in Erasmus' own copy of Revelation (MS 1).

    All other MSS (more than 150) read some form of KAI PARESTAI ("and will be present").

    Even though the meaning between the TR's KAIPER ESTIN and KAI PARESTIN is altered by a shift of word roots, Moorman attempts to minimize the problem by claiming that the TR reading and the 40-MSS minority variant "can translate virtually the same as the KJV," even though this is not really the case.

    In regard to the reading overwhelmingly supported by all other MSS ("and will be present"), Moorman clutches at straws, claiming that, even though "the context ... is the future Tribulation", somehow "it strains the sense to be looking at something that 'will come'".

    It certainly would be easier for KJVO defenders to agree with Hills on this point, and recognize an apparent compositor's error for what it was, and from that to move to a legitimate variant reading as more accurate and therefore more acceptable. But then, the same people who maintain that "strain at a gnat" is "advanced revelation" will not be likely to alter their position in this case either.
     
  3. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    17
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Four of the earlier English Bibles of which the KJV was a revision (Tyndale's, Coverdale's, Matthew's, and Great Bibles) have the following
    rendering as their end of Revelation 17:8--"when they behold the beast that was and is not." These four Bibles do not have the words "and yet is" that are found in the KJV.
     
Loading...