1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Scofield Study Bible

Discussion in '2000-02 Archive' started by Kiffin, Apr 14, 2002.

  1. Kiffin

    Kiffin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    2,191
    Ratings:
    +0
    Any of you use the Scofield Study Bible? I am not a dispensationalist but I still enjoy using it for study. I especially like his notes on Romans. Scofield has his flaws but I still think it is a pretty good study Bible though I don't always agree with his Dispensationalism.
     
  2. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    5,394
    Ratings:
    +180
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I own one; don't use it; don't recommend it.
     
  3. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Ratings:
    +0
    I am a dispensationalist. I have one ... don't use it ... It is like any study Bible ... some of it is good and some of it is bad.

    [ April 14, 2002, 11:34 PM: Message edited by: Pastor Larry ]
     
  4. DocCas

    DocCas New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,103
    Ratings:
    +0
    I preach from a SRB, not because of the notes, which I largely ignore, but because it come in a large print edition which I can see from the pulpit without my reading glasses. [​IMG]
     
  5. tyndale1946

    tyndale1946 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    6,197
    Ratings:
    +428
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This is for information only not to start a debate but wasn't the Scofield Bible responsible for starting the dispensationalist movement and has it helpful or hurtful to the church?... Brother Glen :confused:

    [ April 15, 2002, 12:33 AM: Message edited by: tyndale1946 ]
     
  6. Forever settled in heaven

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,770
    Ratings:
    +0
    if u're learning the KJB verbatim by heart, don't get caught offside w the Scofield, which can happen at places where the words are "updated" but not flagged as such. cld really hurt ur grade!

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Kiffin

    Kiffin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    2,191
    Ratings:
    +0
    Mine is the 1979 New Scofield KJV with the updated modernized KJV words in places (Not the NKJV) plus I got a 1917 Scofield. Do they still make the 1979 New Scofield KJV? Mine is about 12 years old but thought it was replaced by the NKJV (But I may be wrong)
     
  8. Chris Temple

    Chris Temple New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2000
    Messages:
    2,841
    Ratings:
    +0
    That '79 edition is actually the 1967 update, which was called the New Scofield. It is no longer in print. One can now get the Old Scofield (1917 notes) or the New Scofield (1967 notes) but the only versions are the KJV or NIV. It was published for a while in the NKJV and even the NASB, though I don't believe it is anymore.

    Enough KJVOs apparently complained about the 1967 edition "changing" the KJV words, that they dropped the edition with the alternate tranlsations in the text and they went back to the standard KJV with the alternate translations in the margin.
     
  9. Chris Temple

    Chris Temple New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2000
    Messages:
    2,841
    Ratings:
    +0
    Scofield did not invent dispensationalism, but he certainly fine-tuned it and brought it to the masses. it is probably safe to say that if it were not for the Scofield Bible, dispensationalism would not enjoy being the primary evangelical theological system it is today.
     
  10. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Ratings:
    +0
    Chris wrote:
    Yes and no. He and Ryrie did much to popularize dispy belief, but I'd take issue with dispy being the "primary evangelical theological system" today, or at least the Ryrie-Scofield system. Is it primary or is it like the frogs on a farm pond at night? You've only got a few but they make enough noise that it sounds like a million of them :D
     
  11. pinoybaptist

    pinoybaptist Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    8,123
    Ratings:
    +1
    [​IMG] Hey, you PB's on this board. Hope one or two of you stroll in here. I wonder if there are any study Bibles you might recommend which is more or less in line with what we believe.
    I know Scoffield is out, but what about Thompson's ? Hope to hear from y'all.
     
  12. Rev. Joshua

    Rev. Joshua <img src=/cjv.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    2,859
    Ratings:
    +0
    Tom, I'd say the latter. When I was in seminary, we spent about fifteen minutes on dispensatinalism. It was in a systematic theology class, and essentially the professor talked for a couple of minutes about this obscure theological movement that was popularized by a couple of study Bibles and somehow made it's way into a few evangelical seminaries.

    Then we moved on.

    I was very surprised, in later conversations with fundamentalist colleagues, to learn how important dispensationalism is to their theology.

    Joshua

    [ April 15, 2002, 09:52 AM: Message edited by: Rev. Joshua Villines ]
     
  13. Kiffin

    Kiffin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    2,191
    Ratings:
    +0
    Personaly I find the Thompsom Chain to be the best overall Study Bible. Others that are top notch are...New Geneva, MacArthur, NIV Study Bible and the Amplified.

    The 1967 Scofield KJV I remember KJVO's didn't like it. I find it to be a interesting KJV translation.
     
  14. Rev. Joshua

    Rev. Joshua <img src=/cjv.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    2,859
    Ratings:
    +0
    On a related note, it is perhaps an understatement to say that the Oxford New Annotated Study Bible has become the norm in the seminaries with which I am familiar (although the Harper-Collins is making some headway). Every ordination Bible I've seen presented has been an Oxford.

    How popular is it in the fundamentalist camp?

    Joshua
     
  15. DocCas

    DocCas New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,103
    Ratings:
    +0
    My Scofield is the 1909 edition, but I have New Scofield with the word changes which was published in 1967, with a second edition in 1979. I don't believe they are still in print but CBD (http://www.christianbook.com/) carries them, but Chris is right, the word changes have been moved from the text to the margin.

    [ April 15, 2002, 01:08 PM: Message edited by: Thomas Cassidy ]
     
  16. Chris Temple

    Chris Temple New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2000
    Messages:
    2,841
    Ratings:
    +0
    Need you ask?? :rolleyes:
     
  17. Chris Temple

    Chris Temple New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2000
    Messages:
    2,841
    Ratings:
    +0
    There are 4 I use which I find indispensable:

    The New Open Bible (NKJV). This is my favorite. Few notes (mostly historic,geographic), good type, excellent articles and the famous bibliocyclopedia in the front.

    2) Thompson Chain Reference Bible (NASB) excellent subject chain references and archaeological helps and history helps.

    3) MAcArthur Study Bible (NKJV) Excellent. I've got the CD Rom. One of only two Reformed Study Bibles I know of. It's from MacArthur, so its solid. Odd interpretations in some passages, and dispensational, but much better than a Ryrie, for instance. Strong on election and Lordship of Christ.

    4) The New Geneva Study Bible (NKJV, now called Reformation Study Bible). The best notes and articles, hands, down. R.C. Sproul Editor. The only downside (and its important) is the miserably
    small type used (must be Times Roman 7 or 8). Also paedobaptist, though not oppressively.

    If I had top choose only one, I'd probably choose the MacArthur. Using the MacArthur along with the New Geneva allows me to compare convenantal and
    dispensational notes in key passages. I carry with me the New Open, and teach from it as well as read devotionally from it. To me, its the best design in Study Bibles (something the New Geneva should have followed).
     
  18. Marathon Man

    Marathon Man New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2001
    Messages:
    109
    Ratings:
    +0
    Posted by Kiffin: Personaly I find the Thompsom Chain to be the best overall Study Bible.

    Agree wholeheartedly. I love the quality of Thompson bibles, as well as the reference system. Just wish they'd publish it in the ESV and/or the Updated NASB (Hey, I can dream, can't I?).
     
  19. Carly33

    Carly33 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2002
    Messages:
    174
    Ratings:
    +0
    My personal favorite is the Thompson chain...I tend to prefer references to commentaries. Too often a commentary can substitute our own study or bias us before we go to the word.

    A pastor friend of mine uses the Dake. Anybody comment on that one?
     
  20. tyndale1946

    tyndale1946 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    6,197
    Ratings:
    +428
    Faith:
    Baptist
    PinoyBaptist here I am! I use a Thompson Chain Reference and would recommemd it. What other PBs use you would have to ask them. The best study Bible I found was Me, The Lord, and my KJV!... Brother Glen [​IMG]
     
Loading...