1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Secretive UN Legal Conference Wants to Outlaw “Climate Change Denial”

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by poncho, Oct 14, 2015.

  1. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    When you’re dealing with one of the most controversial debates in modern history, a little tact is in order. Or at least it should be with global warming, because contrary to popular opinion, it is not a settled science. While the majority of people in most countries believe that it’s happening, many of them don’t think that it’s being caused by human behavior.

    And don’t believe anyone who tells you that there is a ‘consensus’ in the scientific community. The oft-repeated statistic that claims 97% of scientists believe in man-made global warming, is a joke. That number can be tied to a vague 2009 questionnaire that was only answered by 79 scientists from the climate field, and which ignored the opinions of thousands of researchers from multiple relevant fields. There is no consensus.

    You could say that none of this is important, because something can be true even if nobody believes it. In our world however, consensus is the closest we can get to the truth. If everybody agrees on something, then there’s a very good chance that it is a fact.

    If however, a sizable percentage of the population that consists of both scientists and laymen disagree with popular opinion, then it can hardly be called a settled science. This situation calls for more research and debate until the truth, whatever it may be, becomes indisputable and everyone can get on board with that reality. You know what it doesn’t call for? Persecuting and prosecuting the minority that has dared to disagree with popular opinion.

    And that’s exactly what a secretive UN funded legal conference decided to do last month, when they met to discuss climate change and how the International Court of Justice should tackle it.

    Continue . . . http://www.thedailysheeple.com/secr...-wants-to-outlaw-climate-change-denial_102015
     
  2. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    They want to make it illegal because they want to shut down debate. They have grown impatient over global governance which is the goal of the lie of climate change.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  3. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    It's international political correctness.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. pwarbi

    pwarbi Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2015
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    9
    Is also tend to think that the only reason they're doing that is because they want the debate shut down, and it makes me wonder if there's an hidden agenda somewhere behind that.
     
  5. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    7,727
    Likes Received:
    873
    Faith:
    Baptist
    See posts 2 & 3
     
  6. pwarbi

    pwarbi Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2015
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    9
    I've read and agreed with posts 2 and 3. And that explains what the hidden agenda is how exactly?
     
  7. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Actually the agenda is hidden in plain sight. It's in the globalist's own documents, the newspapers, and on TV in the proclamations made by the heads of states in the USA and Europe as they call for a "New World Order".

    The European Union is the globalist model for world government where a central planning authority of un-elected bureaucrats lords over and hands down mandates to the individual "member states" who are obliged to follow them or face "legal" challenges in a "world court" or economic terrorism from the Word Bank, IMF and Bank For International Settlements.

    The globalists believe that national sovereignty is an evil that must be stamped out. In other words they believe it's their right to run the world's governments as they see fit regardless of what those governments and the people who elect those governments feel is in their own best interests.

    The climate change agenda boiled down is nothing more than the globalist's attempt to further reduce national sovereignty and place a global carbon tax on us that would serve to enrich them while they reduce the industrialized nations to third world conditions. It has nothing to do with saving mankind from a climate disaster and everything to do with bringing mankind under their total control.

    In their hearts and actions the globalists are anti democratic, anti freedom and anti human.

    Globalist = Internationalist.

    Internationalists do not believe in democracy and self rule. They believe in an un-elected global central planning authority with jurisdiction and final say over all nations. The "new world order" is a combination of corporatism and communism. The globalists are consolidating their power much as the Soviets and Nazis did through socialism and forcing "political correctness" down everyone's throat to shut down protest and dissent.

    Open borders and unchecked mass immigration is part of the same globalist agenda to destroy national sovereignty by dividing us along racial and religious lines which will lead to civil unrest that will give the globalists the pretext they need to crack down on us even more and take away the rest of our freedoms.

    What's the globalist's worse nightmare? An awake and aware population of several hundred million with guns. That's why they want to take our 2nd amendment right to keep and bear arms away so bad.
     
    #7 poncho, Oct 16, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2015
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
  9. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Top French Meteorologist Persecuted for Debunking Climate Hysteria

    PARIS — Just months before the massive United Nations “Climate Change” summit hosted by the French government is set to take place in Paris, France's top meteorologist is blowing the whistle on the hysteria surrounding alleged man-made global-warming theories. Blasting the UN's controversial climate agenda and the corruption of science to serve radical political goals, chief weatherman Philippe Verdier (shown) with state-funded broadcasting giant France Televisions said the world had been taken “hostage” by misleading data peddled by politicians and climatologists. He also touted the benefits of climate change, especially to France, and blasted "renewable energy." In response, his employer — essentially, the French government — promptly took the climate heretic off the air and put him on “forced holiday,” ironically, confirming a key thesis of his book. The devastating blow dealt by Verdier to climate hysteria in France, though, may be impossible for the nation's Socialist Party rulers and media apparatchiks to repair before the UN climate summit. And he may not be the last whistleblower waiting to expose the fraud before the Paris confab.

    Verdier is France Televisions chief of meteorology and the nation's most famous weatherman, providing nightly forecasts to millions of viewers. Everything was fine until he ventured into what might come in the decades and centuries ahead. In a new book, dubbedClimat Investigation, or Climate Investigation in English, Verdier lambasted the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), saying its climatologists and political backers have “taken the world hostage” with misleading or downright inaccurate data. The revelations took France by storm, sparking furious outrage by politicians, Big Labor, climate alarmists, and establishment media outlets. Within days, the scandal went global, with the U.K. Telegraph and media outlets across Europe picking up the story. The news is especially explosive because it comes less than two months before the start of a massive UN climate summit in Pariswhere the UN, its member regimes, and establishment interests hope to approve a sweeping global-warming regime to ration energy use and re-engineer civilization under the guise of saving humanity from itself.

    Continue . . . http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/...ist-persecuted-for-debunking-climate-hysteria
     
  10. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Sec. State Kerry: Disqualify Climate Change Skeptics from High Public Office

    Democrat senator called for using RICO against skeptics

    During the Climate and Clean Energy Investment Forum held in Washington on Wednesday, Secretary of State John Kerry said those who question climate change should be disqualified from seeking public office.



    In the past Democrats have called for criminalizing climate change skepticism.

    Following a letter sent to Obama, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and the head of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy by a group of climate scientists calling for their political opponents to be investigated by the government, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, proposed using RICO against skeptics.

    RICO, short for Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, is a federal law designed to investigate and prosecute the Mafia and organized crime. It imposes prison sentences up to 20 years and the seizure of financial assets.

    Following the call to criminalize opposition to climate change, the Republican chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology sent a letter to the attorney of scientist Jagadish Shukla, a professor at George Mason University.

    Texas Rep. Lamar Smith said his committee is investigating grants “worth millions of dollars” to nonprofits established by Shukla. The letter claims Shukla is guilty of “an egregious use of taxpayer money.”

    Obama Administration’s Climate Assessment Debunked

    Continue . . . http://www.prisonplanet.com/sec-sta...-change-skeptics-from-high-public-office.html
     
Loading...