1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Speaking in tongues?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by bodyofchrist32, Feb 8, 2009.

  1. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    A lot of people are also unaware that speaking in tongues that are gibberish (glossolalia) is found in non-Christian religions when people are in ecstatic states. This is even more reason, imo, to believe that speaking in tongues in the early church was speaking in foreign languages, not gibberish.
     
  2. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    So-called speaking in tongues usually connects with those religions who base their results on "feelings" rather than on "promises" of God. I am saved because I feel saved, or I am saved regardless of my emotion. That is the difference.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  3. John Toppass

    John Toppass Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    8
    What makes you think that if a gift was used only once that it was taken away? Is there any Scripture stating how often gifts are used?

    In the case of tongues, could it be that it was only need once since there are so many other ways of communicating the Word?
     
  4. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't think a gift was taken away! I said the opposite! You are the one who asked me why I thought the gifts were ongoing.

    Read 1 Cor 12.

    I cannot prove that someone had a gift just once, but in the context of where all the gifts are mentioned, it is reasonable to conclude that people had them on an ongoing basis.

    God can effect a miracle today but this does not mean it is a gift. Someone may have a talent, but that is not necessarily a gift as listed in the NT.

    The gifts to believers were given for specific purposes as listed in scripture. A one time event when someone speaks miraculously in a foreign language and never again does not match up the context of the NT on gifts.

    I said nothing unusual - you seem to be jumping on this for some reason.
     
  5. John Toppass

    John Toppass Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    8
    I apoligize, I thought when you said "Because a gift given through the Holy Spirit is depicted in the NT as something someone has and does not lose. It's not just something that happens once." You were implying that.

    I did not mean to offend you, this happen with you quite abit with various members. Most are not disagreeing just asking why you believe that. It has been nice talking to you.

    I have read 1 Cor. 12 and 13&14 that is why I wondered why you were saying that gifts must be used multiple times because I read nothing at all that says that.
     
    #45 John Toppass, Feb 10, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 10, 2009
  6. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    When you asked me why I think a gift had to be ongoing, it was because I had referenced the story you or someone told on this thread and I was trying to show there could be a difference between a gift as described in the NT and a one-time miraculous event. Being able to speak in a foreign language all of a sudden and then never doing it again (which is true in 2 stories I've heard) does not sound like a gift as depicted in the NT.

    So, right, I said that a gift is not something that just happens once. I think the context of the NT passages on gifts implies it is ongoing. It is not that I think they must be used multiple times, but what kind of gift is it if one only uses it once? Remember this would apply to all of them - the gift of service (helps), teaching, mercy, discernment, administration, etc. Would someone have a gift to teach one time? To help one time? To be merciful only once? To discern one time? Same with tongues - why would it be one time only?

    It's totally reasonable to conclude these gifts were ongoing in the life of the believer who had them.
     
  7. John Toppass

    John Toppass Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    8
    I thought we were talking about gifts of tongues. Yes, I believe that if the gift of tongues were needed only once then that is all it would be used. The bible does not imply that this not so. I, myself, have never witnessed the gift of tongues in the fashion that Paul says it should appear so I do not think the few times I have been in a Pentecostal service where many people at once were speaking in tongues was of God. There was much confusion.
     
  8. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Likes Received:
    2
    John the Baptist was filled with the Spirit while in the womb, and obviously filled with the Spirit afterward. Filled and indwelt sound like the same thing to me.

    With at least two different definitions of tongues, we have to be sure that others know which definition we're using. In my comment, I was using the charismatic definition, which is "ecstatic utterance," in which the speaker has no idea what he's saying. I think Paul, aware of the pagan tongues, insisted that somebody interpret, to distinguish the utterance from the pagan practice.


    The Acts 2 definition, in my view is that the tongues were known languages. Whether the miracle was in the speaking or the hearing is beside the point. Those who heard understood in their own language.

    I join Tiny Tim in his evaluation of tongues. As a general rule, they're not operative today. But God may give them as an ability wherever he deems it necessary so someone can hear the gospel.
     
    #48 Tom Butler, Feb 10, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 10, 2009
  9. John Toppass

    John Toppass Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    8
    AMEN Brother
     
  10. Jon-Marc

    Jon-Marc New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,752
    Likes Received:
    0
    On the day of Pentecost, God gave to the disciples the ability to speak in the many different languages of the people of that time. Acts 2:6-11 tells how the unlearned disciples spoke in the languages of the people, and that they were all amazed at hearing the gospel in their own language--not in some unknown tongue that would mean nothing to them.

    They didn't have the written word of God at that time--except maybe for whatever Old Testament scripture they may have had, but they had no written words about the birth of the Son of God and the future events as we have now.

    Tongues (known languages) were a sign to the unbelievers. They are no longer necessary since we now have the written, inspired word of God for all to read and hear. Some churches even make speaking in tongues a requirement for salvation, and that is just plain WRONG.

    Tongues are also seldom (if ever) done correctly. For one thing, there HAS to be an interpreter. Otherwise, they must remain silent in the church to avoid confusion. "If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be two, or at the most by three, and that by course, and let one interpret. But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silent in the church, and let him speak to himself and to God." 1 Cor. 14:27,28

    So-called "tongues" are more often than not done for the edifying of the speaker only. He/she is seeking praise and admiration of others and wants to appear to be more spiritual than others. One time in a Pentecostal church, everyone (except me) started speaking all kinds of gibberish (that's what it sounded like to me). No one was interpreting any of it, and I doubt that anyone could have done so. One woman near me kept repeating over and over something that sounded like "Ah ditty", in an obvious effort to appear as spiritual as the rest of the people hoped they sounded.

    I was very uncomfortable and wanted to leave, but, unfortunately, I was there as someone's guest. I'm sure they wouldn't have noticed if I had driven myself there and just left. They were all too wrapped in in themselves and trying to outdo everyone else in sounding spiritual.
     
    #50 Jon-Marc, Feb 11, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 11, 2009
  11. mima

    mima New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2006
    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Speaking in tongues.

    The doubters will have a heyday with this posting!


    While lying in bed this morning praying I was considering why some have the gift of tongues and some do not have the gift of tongues. When the Lord spoke to my spirit and said," the gift of tongues is not given to some because of the blindness of "denominational tradition"
    ---mima on 2/11/09
     
  12. Todd W. White

    Todd W. White Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2008
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Excellent post, Jon-Marc!
     
  13. Todd W. White

    Todd W. White Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2008
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, Bro. Jim!

    You wrote:

     
  14. Thinkingstuff

    Thinkingstuff Active Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,248
    Likes Received:
    9
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I still think speaking in "tounges" and other activities associated as particularily Pentecostal or Charasmatic are excuses to obtain a eupohoria through repetatively blabbing nonsense or mantricly singing a chorus causing hyperventalation (lack of oxygen to the brain much like alchohol) and a feeling of lightness people mistakenly call the Holy Spirit which is why many pass out (slain in the spirit) feel free to spasm sporatically (electrified by the spirit or on fire) and a multitude of other things that really have a medical explination rather than a spiritual one. When the Euphoric feeling arises its called "having church" with lots of screaming etc....

    That's not what Paul was talking about.
     
  15. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    I was not just speaking of the gift of tongues, but of the stories recounted here. I was saying that those appeared to be God performing a miracle, but were not the gift of tongues (since the event happened just once). A gift and a miracle are not the same thing.

    Since the gifts were given and expected to be used, it is only rational to conclude that the gifts were ongoing and not used just once. I don't seem to be able to communicate this point to you.
     
  16. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    I agree with the rest of your post, but not this part. I think John, as the last OT prophet, was given the Holy Spirit for periods of time but there was no indwelling of the Holy Spirit in believers until after Pentecost.

    Jesus said He had to leave in order for the "Comforter" to come. So John could not be indwelt by the Holy Spirit as believers are, but he could be given the Holy Spirit as the OT prophets were.
     
  17. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sorry, but I do not think the Lord said this.
     
  18. Todd W. White

    Todd W. White Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2008
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree, Marcia.

    Extra-biblical "revelation" (I'm speaking of something that is purported to be as authoritative as the Bible) is not of God - the next revealing of the Word will be THE Word, Jesus Christ!
     
  19. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    698
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Worried and upset that all Christians don't speak in tongues?
    Try reading the Bible.

    I Cor. 12:29-30
    Are all apostles? . . . do all speak with tongues?
     
  20. dcorbett

    dcorbett Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2003
    Messages:
    3,414
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Paul didn't say he did it, he said if he did it, he would be like.......that is what "though" means. Kinda like saying - "though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool"

    Tongues was nothing more than God spreading the gospel during the transitional book of Acts. "Tongues" are other languages, not the gibberish you hear people spouting that makes absolutely no sense.
     
Loading...