Featured Suppose Your Fave Candidate Employed Openly Gay People?

Much more to be preferred than your corruption thereof.

 

If you goal is to destroy something it is extremely useful to understand how it was put together and how it works.

 

Good answer & JDF, perhaps its not ignorance, but rather blatent disregard.

 

In the context of to-day's language "queer" also is basically a term used to declare one's hatred for homosexuals, I suppose "sodomite" might be acceptable.

How so? I think homosexual acts and lusts are sin BTW if you were going to say that.

In that case the question is raised, why don't candidates who oppose gay marriage also pushing for banning no-fault divorce which has been responsible for the destruction of far more families than gay marriage ever has or will?

 

I am not concerned about the context of to-day's language. rather the most appropriate word to describe a person who disobeys Gods laws & fornicates with the same sex.....using, ....ah OK cant get sexually descriptive. But what they do is NOT normal or part of God's plan to procreate & in my book that is "Queer" & I would tell them that to their collective faces. Your queer & I'm not here to candy-coat those queer actions as normal.... if your looking for another descriptive, then "Abnormal" or "Freak" as in "Freak of Nature" could well apply.

And am I hateful, not at all. What I am is someone who feels sorry for them for not living a well balanced & normal life.

 

But if he "or them" was always in your face about "I'm gay" and "Gay rights" would you go there??