1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Supreme Court head scratcher with two rulings

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by Crabtownboy, Jun 27, 2013.

  1. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    17,383
    Ratings:
    +636
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The Supreme Court struck down the heart and soul of the voting rights act. In essence they said, "It is all right to discriminate."

    In the DOMA and Prop 8 decision the supreme court said, "It is not all right to discriminate".

    Seems inconsistent and illogical.
     
  2. Don

    Don Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,675
    Ratings:
    +558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Only if you don't actually understand. They didn't say it's okay to discriminate; for that to be true, there would have to have been a preponderance of evidence that the discrimination that required that portion of the law was still occurring. The justices apparently were not persuaded that the law was still necessary.
     
  3. thisnumbersdisconnected

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Ratings:
    +1
    That is not the essence of the decision involving VRA at all. That is a misrepresentation or a misunderstanding on your part, one or the other. There is no ability to discriminate established by Tuesday's decision.

    The Court struck down Section 4 of the Act, the part that dictated that Alabama, Mississippi, Virginia, Texas, Georgia, Louisiana, South Carolina and -- inexplicably, South Dakota and Alaska -- had to get federal approval for any changes to their voting rights procedures. The rest of the VRA remains in effect and, if voters in any state, not just those, believes they have been discriminated against, they can complain to the U.S. District Court system to redress their grievance under the Act.
     
  4. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    39,131
    Ratings:
    +2,360
    Faith:
    Baptist
    One of the dumber things you have posted.
     
  5. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,297
    Ratings:
    +35
    Amen to that. Either deliberately dishonest, or dangerously ignorant.
     
Loading...