Tampering With the Word of God

Pastor KevinR
"Isn't Proverbs 30:6 in every BV?"

It's in every valid version I've ever read, and, far as I'm concerned, it applies to every one of'em. That's why I said, "Typical KJVO unproveable statement".

Whaddya think? Should we give the Onlyists a break? They're really "evidence-challenged".

Give'em a break? I don't think so. The subject-God's word-is too important to let up for one second in our battle against the Onlyism myth.

 

Remind us again as to what makes a Bible a "valid version" in your eyes.


Jim

 

I agree with Kidz-4-HIM, but I disagree with you because MVs on Luke 2:33 show that Jesus is a sinner. </font>[/QUOTE]I read three MVs here (NIV, NLT, NASB) none seem
to show me "Jesus is a sinner", none even
imply to me that "Jesus is a sinner".

You got some tall explanin' to do here.
BTW, can i get you in the future to not
homogonize all MVs together but talk about
specific MVs. Thank you. Your lumping
all MVs togher reminds me of Sister Riplinger's
preaching.

Did you know there are so called "MVs" that
claim to be revisions of the KJV but
in modern language?
Is THIRD MILLENNILUM BIBLE a MV?
Is 21st Century King James a MV?
Is KJV1769 a MV?
Is KJV1873 a MV?

 

Remind us again as to what makes a Bible a "valid version" in your eyes.


Jim </font>[/QUOTE]A valid version is any one which follows its sources closely.

Now, Jim, please remind us what makes a non-valid version in your eyes.(NOT "It aint the KJV")

And please remind us by whose authority that we should be KJVO.