1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Best Wine

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by His Blood Spoke My Name, Aug 31, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    I totally don't get what you're saying from the passage. Daniel could still have eaten meat and not the king's meat, couldn't he? There's a guy I knew who I honestly couldn't stand and he ran a vineyard. To this day, I wouldn't purchase his wine ever - just a thick-headedness in me - but that doesn't mean I don't purchase wine. The king's wine doesn't necessarily mean the same kind as in alcoholic wine but it means that he would not drink the wine that the king owned, grew, etc. I'm sure there were other wine producers around there and that Daniel could have even made his own. That's how *I* read that Scripture.
     
  2. Diggin in da Word

    Diggin in da Word New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Read it again adn let scripture interpret scripture. Go into Proverbs and see that alcohol deceives and mocks. See God's command to have nothing to do with alcohol.

    Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the kings wine.
     
  3. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    If all wine was alcoholic, Daniel would have been defiling himself with any wine, not just the king's wine.

    Don't you get dizzy arguing in circles?

    The wine Daniel drank was different from that wine the king drank. It was not fermented.

    Prove from Scripture that Daniel's wine was non-alcoholic.
     
  4. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    I read from the passage that grape juice is a mocker, and that when God said that wine was a blessing, he was really trying to just trick us and see if we would let the Spirit interpret Scripture for us and tell us that he wasn't telling the truth.

    The previous statement makes as much sense as many here, who are trying to say that wine is not really wine when it's something good; it's only wine when it's bad.
     
  5. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    The previous statement makes as much sense as many here, who are trying to say that wine is not really wine when it's something good; it's only wine when it's bad.

    Shush! That's "context." :laugh:
     
  6. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sounds like something we do with our children...

    When they are good, they are mine,
    When they are bad, they are hers.

    When The Bible says Wine is bad, it is alcoholic
    When the Bible says Wine is good, it is grape juice

    Is that correct?
     
  7. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm surprised that there is no mention (so far) that the Bible does in fact make a distinction between wine and grape juice:

    He shall drink no vinegar made from wine or strong drink and shall not drink any juice of grapes or eat grapes, fresh or dried. (Num. 6:3)​

    And, of course, the Nazirite vow was only temporary:

    And after [completing his vow and making his sacrifices] the Nazirite may drink wine. (Num. 6:20)​

    There is no reason to assume that Moses meant something different by "wine" in verse 3 than later in verse 20.
     
  8. Diggin in da Word

    Diggin in da Word New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Shall drink no vinegar made from wine. Wine when it ferments becomes alcoholic, if that alcoholic beverage is left to age too long, under certain weather condition, will turn to vinegar. Easily explained in science books.

    Nazarite vow was not just temporary. Some would take the vow for life.

    After vow was fulfilled, they were allowed to once again drink non fermented wine.

    Simple
     
  9. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    Somebody on one of these threads did point that out. It was simply swept away and put into the proper "context".
     
  10. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,851
    Likes Received:
    1,084
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Or it was kosher and the king's wasn't.
     
  11. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    Yep - I did - and I said why, if wine meant juice was it mentioned twice as two different things? No one touched that one.

    Ann
     
  12. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    You can choose what you want to eat. Daniel chose a vegetarian diet. we are not obligated to do so, though many, volunatarily do so. It has nothing to do with Daniel. Neither does drinking only water. In Daniel 10 it appears that Daniel went on a fast. To abstain from the king's wine would again mean that he drank water, just as he did in chapter one. If he drank either wine or grape juice he would not be fasting. The fact that it states that he was mourning usually includes the idea of fasting.

    The choice is yours. No one is compelling you to fast, to follow a diet like Daniel's. It is not a directive that is given in the Bible. Obviously I don't have preconceived ideas from the Book of Daniel. Do you?
    DHK
     
  13. Diggin in da Word

    Diggin in da Word New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    I do not believe it was the kings wine here in chapter 10. As I stated before, if he abstained in chapter 1 because the wine would defile him, why would he begin drinking it sometime after that?
     
  14. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    Where does it say he began drinking it?
    What evidence do you have that he drank any alcoholic beverage?
    I don't believe that Daniel ever ate of the "King's meat". It wouldn't have been "kosher." And he knew it.
    DHK
     
  15. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    But there is. Wine in verse twenty stands for all the aforementioned products of the vine. Surely one was not expected to continue to forego vinegar and grapes.


    Also, notice that the KJV uses "liquor" for "juice" in verse three.
    It seems that a word now commonly denoting alcohol, formerly had a much more general meaning.
     
  16. Diggin in da Word

    Diggin in da Word New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    DHK,
    You may be misreading me, Bro. I am not saying Daniel drank alcoholic beverage at all.

    Daniel 10:3 3 I ate no pleasant bread, neither came flesh nor wine in my mouth, neither did I anoint myself at all, till three whole weeks were fulfilled.

    This time period was quite obviously a different time period from that in chapter one as in each chapter, Daniel is speaking of a different king.

    Nebuchadnezzar in chapter one
    Cyrus in chapter ten.

    Just by the third verse of chapter 10, it is seen Daniel drank some kind of wine. As I have stated all along, I do not believe that wine Daniel drank was alcoholic.
     
    #316 Diggin in da Word, Sep 9, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 9, 2006
  17. Diggin in da Word

    Diggin in da Word New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, Jerome!
     
  18. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    Yet that is the ONLY time the word is used (mishrah) and it means "juice". Wine (yayin), however, is used 140 times and the meaning is "wine" 138 times, "banqueting" one time and "winbibbers" 1 time. It is obvious from reading the context of the verses using the word, it means an alcoholic drink. It is not correct to decide that the word DOESN'T mean alcoholic wine because it's spoken of in a positive light and that it does when it talks of it in a negative light. That just doesn't cut it. God is not a God of confusion and using the same word to mean two completely different things - and a very huge difference at that - is not in His character.

    Ann
     
  19. Diggin in da Word

    Diggin in da Word New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    yayin is generic. fermented or unfermented dependant upon the context.

    Wine that makes the heart glad cannot be that same wine that Solomon warned about no matter how much you say they are the same.
     
  20. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    And what is the neutral source that says yayin is generic - meaning both alcoholic and non-alcoholic? Wine that makes the heart glad CAN be the same wine that Solomon spoke of. There is drinking wine and then there is getting drunk on wine no matter how much you say they are the same.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...