1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Crusades, a defensive war?

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by CarpentersApprentice, Jun 7, 2008.

Top Posters
  1. CarpentersApprentice

    CarpentersApprentice New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thomas F. Madden, Professor of History and Director of the Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies at Saint Louis University, believes that the Crusades were a defensive war. He comes to this conclusion because the Moslems took over much of what used to be the Roman Empire (Palestine, North Africa, and some of Spain) and, at least one motivation for the Crusades, was to recover the lost territory.

    Some of his writings on this subject are:

    These articles from his web site.
    and
    The Real History of the Crusades
    and
    Crusaders and Historians

    Your thoughs?

    CA
     
    #1 CarpentersApprentice, Jun 7, 2008
  2. Thinkingstuff

    Thinkingstuff Active Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,248
    Likes Received:
    9
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I didn't read those articles, however, there is some truth to this. It also was an economic war. Moslems had been harrasing the trade routes with taxes and were on the door step of Contantanople. The greatest city of the Day and defender of Western Europe. In order to support the eastern Christians, slow down and stop the progress of Islam into Europe and free up trade routes for the Venicians were all reasons for the crusades.
     
    #2 Thinkingstuff, Jun 7, 2008
  3. Matt Black

    Matt Black Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    11,548
    Likes Received:
    193
    The Seljuks were indeed in danger of overrunning Constantinople in the late 11th century. The irony is that the Crusaders, not really having that motive in mind but rather being hungry for land and trade, ended up hastening the end of the Byzantine Empire (Fourth Crusade etc). So, if it was as simple as: Byzantium threatened by Turks, appeals to the West, Western Christians come and help them defeat the Turks and recapture Anatolia for them, then, yes, the Crusades would have been purely defensive and I'd agree with the quote in the OP. But it wasn't as simple as that....
     
    #3 Matt Black, Jun 9, 2008
  4. Thinkingstuff

    Thinkingstuff Active Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,248
    Likes Received:
    9
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Unfortunately, it never is. Troy was probably more about economics or wealth than Hellen.
     
    #4 Thinkingstuff, Jun 11, 2008
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Loading...