The inspiration of the bible

There would have to be a few scholars who believe that. Most historical documents referrence Mark being the earliest of the gospels written yes it was with Peter in Rome. Eusibius does include this. It seems maybe these are chicken before the egg type of argument. Did Matthew and Luke take from Mark (which is the leading thought)? I think so. And unfortunately, the whole point of determining which was authoritative was because people were holding to these other documents as being authoritative themselves. So what bound them together theologically. My assertion is oral tradition and a liturgy. The evidence points to it.