The Law and the Lawless

OldRegular · Feb 25, 2014

We are supposed to be a nation of laws but under the Obama administration we are becoming a nation of the Lawless, Obama and Holder being the prime motivators!

Attorney General Eric Holder has given the nod to his state counterparts that they do not have to defend laws they consider discriminatory -- effectively giving the green light for states to stop defending bans on gay marriage.

Holder addressed the issue during a gathering of state attorneys general on Tuesday, after detailing his position in a New York Times interview.

Speaking to the National Association of Attorneys General, Holder said that any decision not to defend individual laws must be "exceedingly rare" and reserved for "exceptional circumstances." He indicated that legal challenges to gay marriage bans would qualify as such a circumstance.

"In general, I believe that we must be suspicious of legal classifications based solely on sexual orientation," he said.

His remarks could fuel what is already a wave of legal challenges at the state level. In the wake of the federal Defense of Marriage Act being struck down by the Supreme Court last year, several Democratic state attorneys general have taken the unusual step of abandoning their defense of state gay marriage bans.

Among the most recent is Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring, who stood by as a U.S. District Court ruled against his state's prohibition on same-sex marriage. However, his office said Monday that it would appeal that ruling -- in the interest of expediting the appeals process.

The U.S. attorney general's comments could encourage other state officials to follow in Herring's footsteps.

Holder, in the Times interview, reportedly said that attorneys general should apply a high level of scrutiny on whether to defend a state law when constitutional issues are at stake.

"Engaging in that process and making that determination is something that's appropriate for an attorney general to do," Holder said.

He added, in reference to the Brown v. Board of Education case challenging school segregation: "If I were attorney general in Kansas in 1953, I would not have defended a Kansas statute that put in place separate-but-equal facilities."

A half-dozen Democratic state attorneys general have abandoned their defense of same-sex marriage bans.

But some Republican officials and gay marriage foes have sharply criticized this approach.

After Oregon's attorney general, Ellen Rosenblum, decided not to defend such a marriage amendment, National Organization for Marriage President Brian Brown called the move shameful.

"She swore an oath of office that she would enforce all the laws, not just those she personally agrees with. The people are entitled to a vigorous defense of the laws they enact, and the marriage amendment is no exception to that solemn obligation," he said in a statement.

As for Holder's comments, Wisconsin Republican Attorney General J. B. Van Hollen told the Times: "It really isn't his job to give us advice on defending our constitutions any more than it's our role to give him advice on how to do his job."

In Virginia, the federal court case could have major implications for similar laws throughout the southeast.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...to-drop-defense-gay-marriage-bans-amid-court/
Click to expand...

OldRegular · Feb 25, 2014

Some Black Pastors are taking Holder to task for comparing homosexual rights movement to civil rights movement yet they still vote democrat!

OldRegular · Mar 3, 2014

If you live in one of the 14 states that have set up their own ObamaCare Web site, you now qualify for federal health insurance subsidies whether you meet the requirement for assistance or not. With states like Oregon, Maryland, Hawaii and Massachusetts still sifting through crashed Web sites, the Obama administration ordered that those who apply for federal aid from those states will get the money, regardless of whether they meet income criteria. The numbers here, though, are probably relatively small, but significant as the administration moves closer to the moment at which the president waives the penalties and requirements for individuals under the law. The deadline for ObamaCare compliance falls on March 31. Will the president, who has done so much to shield corporate and union allies from his law, really let the ax fall on the general population?

The Law and the Lawless

OldRegular Well-Known Member

OldRegular Well-Known Member

OldRegular Well-Known Member

Useful Searches

The Law and the Lawless

OldRegular Well-Known Member

OldRegular Well-Known Member

OldRegular Well-Known Member