1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Libertarian Alternative–Airport Security

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by KenH, Nov 17, 2010.

  1. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,938
    Likes Received:
    1,480
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Introducing the American Traveler Dignity Act

    Ron Paul's legislation to try to bring the TSA to heel.


    Introducing the American Traveler Dignity Act

    Mr. Speaker, today I introduce legislation to protect Americans from physical and emotional abuse by federal Transportation Security Administration employees conducting screenings at the nation’s airports. We have seen the videos of terrified children being grabbed and probed by airport screeners. We have read the stories of Americans being subjected to humiliating body imaging machines and/or forced to have the most intimate parts of their bodies poked and fondled. We do not know the potentially harmful effects of the radiation emitted by the new millimeter wave machines.

    In one recent well-publicized case, a TSA official is recorded during an attempted body search saying, “By buying your ticket you gave up a lot of rights.” I strongly disagree and am sure I am not alone in believing that we Americans should never give up our rights in order to travel. As our Declaration of Independence states, our rights are inalienable. This TSA version of our rights looks more like the “rights” granted in the old Soviet Constitutions, where freedoms were granted to Soviet citizens -- right up to the moment the state decided to remove those freedoms.

    - rest at http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1796&Itemid=60
     
  2. targus

    targus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    KenH is it your belief then that all of the objectionable security measures would be ok if it were the airlines completely in charge and the government had no say in it?

    You would be ok with the scanners and pat downs if Delta were doing it themselves?

    Then it would cease to be unconstitutional?
     
  3. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,938
    Likes Received:
    1,480
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The airlines should be allowed to decide who they serve and the terms. That's the point - allow the free market to make these decisions, not the government. Airlines are private businesses.

    The U.S. consititution's purpose is to limit the power of government.
     
  4. targus

    targus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    Would you be ok with racial profiling then if it were the airlines doing it and not the TSA?
     
  5. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
  6. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    I am in favor of profiling period.

    We know who we are at war with, and it is not little old ladies or moms carrying 3-year-old children to visit relatives.

    Israel has a great system for profiling, and they have terrorist issues that we could not even begin to comprehend. They do a background check on all persons who purchase airline tickets.

    As far as our distinct worry about air travel as the primary means of terrorist attack, we are both foolish and ignorant. There are hundreds of other means that are as or more effective that we're not even thinking about. Sometimes I wonder just who is running the ship of state. :BangHead:

    But hey! It all sounds good to the typical American citizen when spun correctly by our famous talking heads on the network news programs.
     
  7. billwald

    billwald New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    2
    From the essay: >As I see it, in the free market, airlines would have the choice between handling their own security or contracting with a private security firm.

    Including Arab air lines?
     
  8. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,938
    Likes Received:
    1,480
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes. That is correct.
     
  9. Robert Snow

    Robert Snow New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    4,466
    Likes Received:
    3
    I don't really have a dog in this fight,I don't like to fly. But if I were in a situation where I had no other choice, I would be more concerned with some idiot blowing the plane up more than I would some stranger giving me a quick pat down.

    Hey, maybe if TSA would work on perfecting their screening procedure and their attitude toward the public, a solution to this problem could be found.

    There is one thing I do find hilarious however about the current policy. They make the pilot's go through the same procedure. Why would a pilot need a bomb, he controls the plane. He could fly it into the ground and there is nothing anyone could do to stop him. You know, if the airline is suspicious about their own pilots, I don't think I want to use their airline anyway.
     
  10. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    So if Delta administers the cancer causing radiation, that's ok?
     
  11. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,938
    Likes Received:
    1,480
    Faith:
    Baptist
    If enough people don't Delta, then Delta will have to change its policy to remain in business.
     
  12. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,938
    Likes Received:
    1,480
    Faith:
    Baptist
  13. sag38

    sag38 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,395
    Likes Received:
    2
    I'm so glad that I don't have to fly. Political correctness is destroying our country. Profiling is the best option.
     
  14. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,536
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Have we forgotten that this "pat-down" only works on out-going aircraft?

    What about in-bound flights from Egypt, Yemen, Mexico and other not-so-friendly international "neighbors"?

    Do they subject their citizens to this kind of physical violation?

    If not, what is to stop them on the in-bound flights?

    HankD
     
    #34 HankD, Nov 18, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2010
  15. Don

    Don Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    11,048
    Likes Received:
    321
    Faith:
    Baptist
  16. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Would you be okay with letting a sex offender do this to your wife?

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/tra...-breasts-laughed/story-e6frg8ro-1225955345734

    How about your kids?

    http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1238602

    How about this? Getting screened by an illegal alien?

    http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2009/dec/tsa-clears-illegal-aliens-work-ny-airport

    http://www.dailyfreeman.com/articles/2009/12/18/blotter/doc4b2b0ed3ab15f415316835.txt

    The terrorists aren't getting on the planes. The terrorists are the TSA people who are humiliating our wives and children.

    None of this is about protecting us from terrorism. It's about condtioning people to obey the federal government without question and making money through corporatism and fearmongering.

    Who's in charge of security?

    This is hardly earth-shattering news though it’s quite disturbing. A few years ago a separate Homeland Security Inspector General report revealed similar problems in the TSA’s dismal air cargo security system and numerous other investigations have exposed dozens of security failures in other crucial areas. Serious lapses have occurred nationwide and, in 2007, TSA workers at three major airports missed hundreds of fake bombs during a covert exercise conducted to see if suspicious items could be smuggled into secure areas. SOURCE

    What about an illegal alien flying the plane?

    Nearly a decade after the nation's deadliest terrorist attack, “strict security controls” didn’t stop dozens of illegal immigrants from receiving government clearance to train as pilots in the U.S. just as the 9/11 hijackers had done. SOURCE

    Boy howdy do I feel a whole lot safer now. This whole system is open to abuse.

    How can you still justify all this?
     
    #36 poncho, Nov 18, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 18, 2010
  17. blackbird

    blackbird Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    11,898
    Likes Received:
    4
    Customs check-in
     
  18. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,536
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The object is to murder and the device could be rigged to detonate just before landing.

    HankD
     
  19. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    Couple of thoughts...

    No one likes the increased security measures in place in the airline industry. They are invasive and compromise one's personal freedoms and boundaries.

    But there has to be some measure of inspection in this age when people are trying to do things to or with other people as hostages, so we're stuck with invasive procedures.

    Some have opted to never fly. That is easy for some, but very difficult for others that may have to fly on an almost weekly basis for their work or ministry. I probably fly 6 times a year, not much at all compared to some people I know (like a few of Southern's seminary profs who fly a couple times a week to teach in extension centers!), but enough so that I pay attention to what happens at airports.

    I think about everything I do before entering the airport -- what I am wearing, the type of shoes, the type of belt, will my pants stay up once the belt is removed, the ease of opening and starting my laptop, what I carry for emergency food or water (if you do not carry some form of food and drink on board, you are an idiot these days when you may sit on a runway for over 8 hours!), and of course, a very careful preparation for my personal items -- following the letter of the law.

    I am probably the least likely suspect for a terror incident, I'm a pastor that anyone can google and find, I'm married for 33 years with kids and grandkids, I work for a facilities management corporation on the campus of a Baptist seminary, I am not a member of NRA, etc., and I'm a middle-aged, slightly overweight, some gray around the edges of my hair, white dude with a Wisconsin accent. As far as I can tell, NO ONE has ever fit my description and also committed an act of terror anywhere, ever. I don't do a thing that would cause anyone to consider me dangerous, I'm friendly, move through the line, don't ask weird questions, don't look around furtively, etc.

    And, I get pulled aside for "special treatment" EVERY time I fly. It has gone so far at one time or another that I was pulled into the special back room for some reason or another. Even after undergoing the special treatment in the initial line, I often get singled out right during boarding for another screening.

    The only thing I can think is that I am so "anti-profile" of a terrorist that they single people like me out on purpose to make a point of the fact that they are not "profiling". But -- in fact -- they are, for they are profiling ME and people like me as being not terrorists and singling us out for the treatment.

    What is worse is that I have been in line with persons of obvious Arabic descent, who were wearing a turban or head scarf of some sort. These guys were nervous as (blankety-blank) and were doing stuff that made me want to tackle them right on the spot. I "observe" their behavior carefully so that I know where the potential target sits. Do they ever get pulled out of line? Nope... It gets even worse while flying in Canada. All the Middle-Easterners are running the airports! Virtually every single airline employee I've seen up there wears a towel on his head or a burka if a female. Sheesh, talk about the fox guarding the henhouse...
     
  20. rbell

    rbell Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here's a personal example of why I have no use for much of what is going on:

    I have grade III spondylolisthesis of the L1, 4, and 5 vertebrae (fancy words for, "my back hurts"). I carry anti-inflammatory medicine, as well as pain meds and muscle relaxers when I travel.

    Last time I came home from overseas, some TSA goon stole my pain medicine. Fortunately, it was just a few pills (the last of a prescription) and I didn't carry too much for that very reason. The TSA thief managed to take it when I was being interrogated at the security station (that was the only time during the trip it was out of my sight, and of course, they kept questioning me as the criminal stole my medicine). He was a smart junkie, too. He left everything but the pain medicine.

    I filed a claim, got a form letter, and they quit responding.

    So, you see, I don't have much use for an organization that allows my stuff to be stolen, and then won't even do me the courtesy of a follow-up letter pertinent to my case. I understand that due to the nature of what was stolen, they're not going to replace it...and the monetary value is negligible. But still...

    And now...the TSA is gonna unionize. You can forget any semblance of accountability now.
     
Loading...