The Party of Death would continue an unjust War

Yes the Party of Death (The Democrats) will continue the war. O-BA-MA won't end the war one day before McCain would have, because O-BA-MA does not want to get blamed for what would follow should we leave too soon.

The Party of Death (the Democrats) have the blood of over 50 million infants on their hands. They have caught up with Joe Stalin in the standings, and only have the 70-100 million victims of Mao in their way before they become the most murderous organization in world history.

Even if we granted you your 250,000 supposed victims of our soldiers, that is not even a good three months' worth of slaughtered infants, torn from the wombs of their mothers that must be laid at the feet of the second greatest mass murder organization in the history of this violent world, the Party of Death, the Democratic Party, that shameless blasphemy of evil and torture.

 

In that case think I'll get in some guitar time tonight. Good luck and travel safely.

 

How about some banjo time ? :wavey:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5GMfgLGVLY

 

I know you will never debate me honestly, but, we do know how many were killed by Clinton & Gore, BEFORE the invasion. Women & babies, too.

 

And the party of donkeys will march us right into the mountains of Pakistan, where they will abandon the troops, if they can't produce victory in six months.

 

It is probably not possible!

 

You know that's an incorrect conclusion! There has been a significant resistance to "body count" measurement since after the Viet Nam war because so many people believed that measure was subject to inflation not withstanding whether or not such was actually the case long term or wide spread. If "body count" was used in Iraq the nay-sayers would have been all over that as well. We know that our warriors - top to bottom - take many precautions to reduce the harm that comes to non-combatants sometimes to an extreme of tying our own hands. We also know that it does happen and there's no such thing as a painless war for those in who's land it is fought. Let's don't make the generals look bad when they're not.

 

The Party of Death (Democratic Party) had a sitting President when the United States got involved in the following wars (justly or unjustly), the facts are:

WW1 - President Woodrow Wilson (Democrat)
WW2 - FDR (Democrat)
Korean War - Truman (Democrat)
Viet Nam - Kennedy (Democrat)

 

Warmongers! Democrats!

 

So you admit that your figures are cooked. Thank you. Now quit stating it as if it were a fact.

 

1. Love how you deftly side-tracked 50 million deaths to deal with an unknown number that at most is tiny by comparison.

2. Our collateral damage figures are miniscule to those of the past. Our fire-bombing of Dresden and Tokyo, not to mention Hiroshima and Nagasaki dwarfed any figures you might concoct out of mid air.

 

Once again, you chickened out of my challenge, BB, and react to being proven wrong, once again, with a childish remark.

You are a coward.

 

Wrong! The correct term is "LIBERAL"

But then again, considering the positions taken --

OK, you're right; as the old saying goes, "A rose by any other name is still a rose".:thumbs::thumbs:

 

Ron Paul has brought this up a few times too.

Obama will continue on the same warpath. He's an internationalist in a government of by and for internationalists. They can't stand any sovereign nation thumbing it's nose at the international (NWO) community. I think maybe we have stepped away from the just war theory a bit with the Bush doctrine of pre emtive warfare though. This doctrine to seems to be in use domestically in law enforcement as well now. Guilty of thought crimes until proven innocent. Or until such time the pres figures you've been intimidated, tortured or bombed into submission and can take your place in the NWO scheme of things.

Hail Victory! Hail the NWO!

 

But he stays with the Republican Party, because of it's rhetoric of smaller gov't, yadda yadda yadda....

 

No baloney.

Uh, the government itself. As a sworn defender of the U.S. constitution and somewhat of a history buff I would have figured you'd know this already. Governments go bad. The state does not like to be confined by the rules that govern it like our constitution. Which is ignored any time Govcorp wants to do a thing. Least that's what our founders were saying...over and over and over.

“I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.”— General Douglas MacArthur

What about vote fraud? Easily hacked voting machines with no paper trail.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd72.htm

When's the last time you went to the local Wal Mart looking at labels on clothes? Go look at em and tell me who puts the clothes on our backs now.

Hint...it ain't us.

The reason we went international after WW2 is because the internationalists want a one world government, same reason they attempted to go international after WW1.

If isolationism doesn't work...how's come the international community's first act towards other nations who prefer to remain independent of the international (NWO) community is to isolate them with sanctions and embargos and threaten them with destruction if they don't submit to the NWO's demands?

Y'all are the real isolationists.

Other people...you mean like the people in the military and energy industrial complexes and international public privateers that follow the flag around claiming rights to others natural resources, for the "common good" of all global citizens? War is a racket.

That's a good reason for endless warfare I reckon.

Let me assure you there was never any doubt in my mind about that. Obama is an internationalist with the same foreign policy "advisers" from the same groups as the rest of the politicians out there...the CFR the Tri Lateral Commission and of course they have all pledged their fielty to AIPAC.

 

I have posted this, several times. I will post it again.

Madelin Albright, Secretary of State under Bill Clinton, supported the genocide of the Iraqi people....

Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.

--60 Minutes (5/12/96)

Here it is on Youtube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbIX1CP9qr4


I'll be around if you have the intellectual honesty to pursue this any further, or even answer it..

Then you can admit Bush has a long way to go.