1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Wicked Husbandmen

Discussion in '2003 Archive' started by Primitive Baptist, Aug 6, 2003.

  1. Tim

    Tim New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2001
    Messages:
    967
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gunther,

    Note that I said "vestiges of the Old Covenant".

    Yes, I agree, the New Covenant was initiated when the veil was rent, but it was established (as a kingdom is established) when it's "competition" was vanquished. That happened when Christless Judaism was defeated some 40 years (a generation) later.

    Hebrews verifies this overlapping time of transition between the covenants(8:13).

    As far as the temple goes, the second temple awaited the coming of Christ to become "glorious" (Haggai 2:3-9). Christ referred to it as "my Father's house". It only became desolate as Christ deserted it (Mat. 23:38). It became an empty symbol after Christ tore the veil. But the Jews still idolized it. Christ destroyed it to show His ultimate victory over those who hated Him--and to show that His new spiritual temple was greater.

    Thus the New Covenant was proven superior. It could never be destroyed (Heb. 12:22-29). Preterism (all types) simply recognizes this important development in the Christian faith, while you dismiss it as insignificant.

    In Christ,

    Tim
     
  2. Grasshopper

    Grasshopper Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,385
    Likes Received:
    23
    As Tim Said, it was still there at the time of the writing of Hebrews.

    Heb 8: 13 In that he saith, A new covenant he hath made the first old. But that which is becoming old and waxeth aged is nigh unto vanishing away.

    Just a few years later it did wax away.
     
  3. Gunther

    Gunther New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    616
    Likes Received:
    0
    Felluz, the O.C. did not have to have the temple. Why is this so hard? Remember that when the O.C. was initiated, the temple did not even exist. In fact, it would not be until another 400+ years before the temple was created.

    The Jews are still idolizing things today. If it wasn't the temple, it is the law or whatever they want. Christ's ultimate conquest will come when no one will ever again shake their fist at his Lordship. That has not happened yet.
     
  4. Grasshopper

    Grasshopper Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,385
    Likes Received:
    23
    Heb 8: 13 In that he saith, A new covenant he hath made the first old. But that which is becoming old and waxeth aged is nigh unto vanishing away.
     
  5. Tim

    Tim New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2001
    Messages:
    967
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gunther,

    When Moses got the Old Covenant from God, he got instructions for the tabernacle at the same time. The tabernacle was simply the transportable version of the temple yet to come. The two things have always gone together. So it was only appropriate that they be eliminated together. Surely you see the richness of the symbolism in this (but you don't have to admit that to me).

    In Christ,

    Tim
     
Loading...