1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Theology of Separation

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by evangelist6589, Oct 24, 2011.

  1. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    There is a similar story in Communicating Christ Cross Culturally, the excellent missiology book by David Hessalgrave. A missionary to Germany bought into the idea that he had to drink beer because all the Germans did who he was trying to win to Christ. He ended up an alcoholic, having to leave the mission field and go into rehab.
     
  2. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,536
    Faith:
    Baptist
    :) Real response

    HankD
     
  3. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    Then, I would suggest that you and I are on a similar page regarding my take on ecumenicism below. You would not allow your congregation to BE Methodist, but see no problem in fellowshipping with a Methodist. I am in agreement. We are all brothers and sisters in Christ, but there are several interpretations of how that works out in a practical matter in the local congregation. We ought not separate from true brothers and sisters, but neither do we need to adopt their interpretation of doctrine.
     
  4. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Then I take it that you are a separatist, though not a secondary separatist.
     
  5. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    Think that the question though does God want us to seperate from those in the Body who view theology differenent?

    Such as between cals/Arms, those in reformed/free churches?

    I think you and I would have fellowship, as I am an Evangelical/very moderate charasmatic, while you and I would differ on secondary issue maybe, still would see agreement on the'essentials!"
     
  6. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Something that may not be clear on this thread yet is that ecclesiastical separation is not about individuals fellowshipping and being friends, no matter what their theology. I could easily fellowship with you on an individual basis, and I am sure I would profit from the friendship. My best friend for decades is a 5 point Calvinist.

    Ecclesiastical separation is about churches cooperating in God's work. One important passage for this doctrine is 2 Cor. 6:14-18, esp. v. 14: "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?" A yoke is where two animals work together. Therefore, Paul was telling the Corinthian church not to work together in God's work with those who are not true believers. (In my book, that starts with Catholic churches, theologically liberal churches and other aberrant ministries.)

    If you were (are?) the pastor of a church and wished our churches to cooperate in an endeavor, at that time I would sit down with you (over Starbucks maybe) and discuss whether we were agreed enough to walk together in the effort (Amos 3:3).
     
  7. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    Think that you would like our church pastor, as he is "open" to diiferent aspects of Christianity, but very fundemental in core doctrines!
     
  8. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    No, I am neither a separatist nor an ecumenicist. I don't draw the distinctions. Others do. They may be separatists or ecumenicists, and as a result, I end up having to play ball in their court from time to time.

    I am in the biblical gospel camp myself -- Jesus prayed that we would be one because of the gospel -- we violate His will at almost every turn, to our own peril. So, while I admit that there are reasons to separate, and that people do separate, I don't hold to the sort of separatism so often seen here on the board. That is because I hold to a biblical model of a church universal. All who are "in Christ" are brothers and joint heirs -- period -- even if I don't agree with them.
     
  9. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,373
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I concur with that! :thumbs:
     
  10. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'm sorry, but that all sounds so vague, so "mugwump" to me. I don't know what you mean by "the sort of separatism so often seen here on the board."

    How far does your "in Christ" model go? Who do you believe are "in Christ"? Can you be more specific?

    (1) As a pastor, would you lead your church to cooperate with the Catholics in an evangelistic effort?

    (2) As a pastor, would you lead your church to cooperate in an evangelistic effort with a liberal church where the pastor does not believe in the deity of Christ?

    That sounds very spiritual--but very impractical. That doesn't help the pastor who is struggling with the issue of how to relate to theological liberals in his town, for example. As for the prayer of Christ, I believe that was answered. I mean really, an unanswered prayer by Christ? So if it was answered, how can we help Christ by answering it for him by fellowshipping with everyone who claims to be "in Christ"? That would be impossible.
     
    #70 John of Japan, Nov 1, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 1, 2011
  11. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I assume you wrote this, though it was inside the quote of what I said. So yes, it is based on this.

    Let me be specific about who I would absolutely not fellowship or cooperate with. There are specific Biblical statements about this.

    (1) Those who get the doctrine of Christ wrong (2 John 9-11).
    (2) Those who get the Gospel wrong (Gal. 1:8-9).
    (3) Those who add to or take from Scripture (Rev. 22:18-19).
    (4) Those who bring division within the local church of Jesus Christ (Rom. 16:17--Note that this was written to a specific local church at Rome, not the church universal.)
    No doubt. :thumbsup:
     
    #71 John of Japan, Nov 1, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 1, 2011
  12. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240

    amazing that we will be living in Eternity together, yet cannot learn to co exist down here!

    Also, don't think ever asked a Christian if cal/Arm, gifts or not, etc right off the bat!

    Some of my friend disagree on Cal/Arm others if Gifts are still today, but we have agreed to respect eachother views, and still focused on our "core doctrines" that we share!
     
  13. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    So, what you are saying is that (your version) of orthodoxy is a test to determine if one is a true Christian or not. I reject that concept, for the same Bible you cite states very clearly that God is the one who sees the heart and knows whether or not a person is truly saved, whether orthodox or not -- and it is very possible that many who are saved are not orthodox, and potentially even heretical.

    Just happened to be a great article on the very subject today by Trevin Wax.

    http://trevinwax.com/ -- "Confessions of a Former Apollinarian."
     
  14. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This is getting ridiculous. First you falsely accuse me of not wanting any outside influence in my church. Now you falsely accuse me of wanting to judge if someone is a true Christian or not. I said no such thing, and believe precisely the opposite. And judging from your link to Trevin Wax's article you are falsely accusing me of separating from an individual who is confused in his doctrine. I'm not talking at all about separating from individuals!! It's ecclesiastical separation, not individual separation.

    I'm disappointed in you. You are not using the excellent brain that you seem to have. Will you actually try to understand what I'm saying here and interact with it, or continue chasing rabbits?
     
  15. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    Might be referring to "what degrees" of theology willing to seperate or not on!

    Will modes of water baptism seperate at church levels?
    Versions of Bible accepted?
    IF Calvinistic/Arminian in salvation modes?
    Think that he was seeking what theology for church seperation, not co operating in play!
     
  16. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    Not chasing rabbits at all. I am trying to interpret some of your mutually exclusive doctrines and unfortunately, not doing a good job at all. Coherence is an important theological tenet, and I feel that you lack coherence in some of your doctrines, and that based more on your theological tradition than actual exegesis.
     
  17. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So it's my fault that you have falsely accused me? What a strange viewpoint that the one sinned against is responsible for the sin. I suppose that's why you did not apologize for bearing false witness against me--it's my fault that I was sinned against.

    I gave a clear statement of the doctrinal basis for ecclesiastical separation in Post #8. You did not answer this. I directed questions to you in Post #70, trying to clarify your postion. You did not answer, nor have you asked me anything to clarify my position, which you clearly do not understand. I have quoted various other Scriptures supporting ecclesiastical separation throughout this thread, none of which you have answered.

    I think it is clear that you are the one with presuppositions that hinder you, not me.
     
  18. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    I gotta question John.

    Can you have ecclesiastical separation without having at least some measure of individual separation?

    This idea that you can divide the two is foreign to my raising (within IFB circles). We weren't encouraged at all to have any sort of friendship outside our own denom and certain denoms were absolutely forbidden except as one had to deal with them because of a blood relationship. After all, we wouldn't want those other denoms to lead us astray... (that was the main excuse given)
     
  19. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That is completely different from how I was raised as an IFB. Personally I think it is contrary to the great soul-winning emphasis that IFB chuches should have and have traditionally had. How can you witness for Christ to say, a Catholic or a liberal Methodist if you have separated individually from them?

    In the IFB circles I was raised in and have gotten my missionary support from, we were and are encouraged to get to know lost people to lead them to Christ, even if they are ostensibly Christians. So for example I dated a Lutheran girl in high school who came to our youth group. Her brother eventually became a Baptist and has served in various IFB colleges. My parents encouraged me to bring lost friends home, and my parents were always building bridges to lost people to try to help and win them.

    At a large IFB church that supports, I recently asked the pastor how the church was prospering so. He told me that some years ago he realized that the church people didn't seem to know any lost people, since they had a Christian school and many church activities. He began encouraging people to get out and participate in the community, and they have had people saved all the time since then. This in my mind is true to the traditional emphasis on evangelism that fundamentalism has always had, going back to the articles on soul-winning and world evangelism the original "Fundamentals" pamphlets had in 1910 or so.

    Ecclesiastical separation is to keep the church pure and true to the holiness of God. However, that does not describe our personal relationships. Remember that Jesus was called a friend of publicans and sinners.
     
    #79 John of Japan, Nov 8, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 8, 2011
  20. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    So, it is only brothers in the Lord with whom you disagree... :laugh:
     
Loading...