Three persistent misconceptions

Boy, I've only got time to quickly answer one of these right now.

http://cis.org/Welfare-Use-Legal-Illegal-Immigrant-Households =>
"An estimated 49 percent of households headed by legal immigrants used one or more welfare programs in 2012, compared to 30 percent of households headed by natives....Equally important, immigrants, including those illegally in the country, can receive welfare on behalf of their U.S.-born children."
When they cross the River to have all those babies, so they will be U.S. citizens, who can run for President over Ted Cruz, what happens to those benefits 'on behalf' of those kids? Many times it's equivalent to the question of what really happens to child support payments.

 

The skin of the truth stuffed with a lie. True that most welfare recipients are white because whites are still the majority.

It may be illegal for illegals to get welfare but they get it anyway. Are the leftist Democrats going to deny illegals medicine, food, shelter, and education?

Why work if you can get welfare--look at corn farmers who have a guaranteed market for corn in government mandated ethanol, which ethanol is so harmful to the environment? Franklin Delano Roosevelt himself, who invented modern socialistic welfare, said that welfare was a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human soul. Democrats never tire of ruining lives with the narcotic of welfare because they hope to force welfare recipients to vote Democrat as a condition of supplying more narcotic welfare to the hapless recipient. The Democrats approve of same-sex marriage and abortion because they don't care what happens to the victims of those hideous practices. Sooner or later the author of this thread will support the death penalty for those who disapprove of his ideas for a white socialist utopia like Minnesota (not a brown socialist utopia like Cuba or Venezuela).

 

Crabtown, why don't you defend your defamatory post against the GOP? Or is that a rhetorical question to you?