1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Understanding John 1:14

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Van, Jun 20, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    26,995
    Likes Received:
    1,021
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Good grief, did anyone say Jesus was uniquely divine because of the Greek word monogenes? No of course not. Why some have so much difficulty cleaving to truth is beyond me.
    The word means "one of o kind" and is translated as "unique" in several English translations. The reason Jesus is unique is that He is divine.​

    Jesus is "one of a kind" because He is uniquely divine, God incarnate.
    That is what I actually said. Why all this effort to find fault where none exists? Go figure!!
     
  2. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    26,995
    Likes Received:
    1,021
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The third word for study is "glory" (G1391 - doxan). What was the glory of Jesus that His Apostles beheld?

    Certainly Jesus fulfilled God's purpose as (1) the Son of God, (2) the Lamb of God, (3) the Christ or Messiah or Savior, (4) the perfect image of God, and (5) as the Good Shepherd caring for and nurturing His sheep. Through the gospel of Christ, we too have beheld His glory. In our verse (John 1:14) some of Christ's unique manifestations of His glory are called out. These will be presented subsequently.
     
  3. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    26,995
    Likes Received:
    1,021
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The next phrase (of the only Son from the Father) contains several controversial words which I believe must be dealt with collectively.

    Of the only Son is the NASB translation of monogenes, and could better be translated as uniquely divine Son.

    From (Greek para) might better be translated as "sent from" indicating God incarnate was sent by the Father. Putting the phrase together we get, "the uniquely divine Son sent from the Father.
     
  4. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No... This is what you actually said:

    What you posted (directly above) is different from what you posted further above.

    Because the error with you is not non-existent.

    The Archangel
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You cannot translate παρα as "sent from." WIth the genitive, which it is in this case, it is simply "from," and it in no way implies a verb. The idea is not that Jesus was "sent from" the Father in this clause. The idea is "we have seen His glory" because "seen" is the most direct correlating verb here. Παρα here modifies glory. If you insist on translating the preposition παρα as "sent from" then--in this text--you would need to say that Jesus' glory was sent from the Father.

    The Archangel
     
  6. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,152
    Likes Received:
    441
    Faith:
    Baptist
    what do you mean by "secondary"? are you saying that there is a Yahweh Who is not Yahweh?
     
  7. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,152
    Likes Received:
    441
    Faith:
    Baptist
    explain how this can be seen as the Deity of Jesus Christ? It is forcing the meaning
     
  8. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    16,088
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No. But a "unique God" to be visible who is at [the invisible] God's side being identied as Yahweh too. John 1:18 [CT reading], Genesis 12:7.
     
  9. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,152
    Likes Received:
    441
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Two Persons Who are equally called Yahweh?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is in the context of the whole passage. The "Word" is identified as being with God and being God in vs 1-3. In v. 14 the Word became flesh and dwelt with man. John continues: "we have seen His glory" and then defines the nature of the glory--"glory as of the only Son from the Father." So, the glory that John (as well as Peter and James) saw was a further demonstration of Jesus' divinity.

    The Archangel
     
  11. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,152
    Likes Received:
    441
    Faith:
    Baptist
    ok, I see, you refer to the passage and not just vere 14. thanks for clearing that.
     
  12. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    Jesus was in the OT as Son of man and as Angel of Yahweh!
     
  13. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    Jesus was and is the only begotten of the father, eternal logos who incarnated as the Son!
     
  14. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    the "conventional" view is that whenever God was seen by men, was preincarnate Christ!
     
  15. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    he is the only one who eternally existed as the Logos of the father
     
  16. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    16,088
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Where in the OT was God called the Son of man?
     
  17. percho

    percho Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,332
    Likes Received:
    458
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I was going to post before I saw this post, IMHO, "(and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,)," in 1:14 is a reference to the transfiguration, as Peter does in 2 Peter 1:17,18. The transfiguration, being a vision of the post resurrected Jesus coming in glory. Also considering 1 Peter 1:21 Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God.

    Your thought?
     
  18. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I think it is likely a reference (either directly or indirectly) to the transfiguration. Much like Peter's words in 2 Peter 1:16, "For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty" (emphasis mine). Obviously, v. 17 and 18 reference the transfiguration more directly. So... it would seem John 1:14 is most likely a reference to the transfiguration.

    The Archangel
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    Daniel One like the Son of man
     
  20. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    16,088
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No. There the Son of man was with God. Daniel 7:13, ". . . behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, . . ."
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...