Vaticanus & Sinaiticus, corrupted manuscript copies - proof

HankD · Oct 28, 2003

Where did I ever claim that two did agree completely? I suggest you reread my post, think a bit, and then after a good bit more you post. Obviously you didn't read my post.
Click to expand...

Earlier you said…

You have claimed that the 5280+ mss all differe from one another. This is blatantly inaccurate. Put simply, 90% of all manuscripts agree, only 10% disagree. where these 10% disagree with the 90%, they also disagree with each other. Or more technically put, 100% of the MSS agree to 80% of the text, 99% agree to another 10%, over 95% agree to another 4%, over 90% agree to another 3%, and only for 3% (or less) of the text do less than 90% of the MSS agree.
Click to expand...

Well, after trying to unravel exactly what this convoluted paragraph says and having thought about it a bit as you suggested, the only conclusion one can come to is that this is a “tongue in cheek” statement.

HankD

Scott J · Oct 28, 2003

Thanks Hank.

Vaticanus & Sinaiticus, corrupted manuscript copies - proof

HankD Well-Known Member
Site Supporter

Scott J Active Member
Site Supporter

Useful Searches

Vaticanus & Sinaiticus, corrupted manuscript copies - proof

HankD Well-Known Member Site Supporter

Scott J Active Member Site Supporter

HankD Well-Known Member
Site Supporter

Scott J Active Member
Site Supporter