1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Wasn't Christ's Atoning Work Enough?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Lou Martuneac, Aug 12, 2008.

  1. Lou Martuneac

    Lou Martuneac New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    0
    In the meantime...

    Since Christ's atoning work satisfied God, why does LS call on the lost for a promise to perform the God ordained "good works" (Eph. 2:10) that should be the natural result of salvation?
     
  2. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    IMO, can you please answer the question directly in this thread that you started. What you wrote raises serious questions. You claim that the LS teaching misleads, distorts, and is a non-saving Gospel. So please just answer the question concerning what you wrote and leave the personal comments about me out of the discussion.
     
  3. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist

    I have clearly shown it is.
     
  4. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    It doesn't. It only does in your mind.
     
  5. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't recall Lou saying anything of the sort. John Mac is not named Lorship Salvation. This is a non sequitur.
     
  6. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    The misleading factor is stating "this folly is debunked".
     
  7. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    Does any advocate of this position have the courage to answer this question: Are those who then teach the LS position or have believed in God through the message are themsleves not saved? I will take by your silence the answer is yes but are either afraid or unwilling to admit it.
     
  8. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist

    The silence is "Thundering" as has been said. :laugh:
     
  9. TCGreek

    TCGreek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lou, thanks for the clarification. I always thought that you were objecting to his LS works and not his salvation.
     
  10. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    What is one to think when reading this then?
     
  11. TCGreek

    TCGreek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    RB, Are you saying then that Lou has questioned the salvation of John MacArthur?
     
  12. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    I am saying that that is the implication. So I asked for clarification.
     
  13. TCGreek

    TCGreek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Fair enough.
     
  14. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Although you finally said that MacArthur is a saved man you raised questions about the honesty of that claim.

    Earlier someone in the comment section said that he/she "doubt[ed] his [JM's]salvation". This person then compared MacArthur's latest book to Richard Dawkin's book :"The God Delusion". In response to that post you said "I agree with all you wrote." Which is it Lou? Do you agree with your commentator or not?[/quote]

    Lou,please respond.
     
  15. Lou Martuneac

    Lou Martuneac New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rippon:

    Which part of my clarifying note did you not understand? Or are you trying to create another personality clash?

    I am moving back to the subject.


    LM
     
  16. Lou Martuneac

    Lou Martuneac New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    0
    What I am dealing with is why, is Jesus paid it all, does LS call on the lost for commitment to the God ordained "good works" (Eph. 2:10) expected of a mature disciple of Christ FOR salvation, to become a Christian?

    Why is Lordship’s “salvation (only) for those who are willing to forsake everything?” Why must the lost come to Christ for salvation with a whole-hearted commitment to deny-self, bear the cross and follow Christ to death if necessary?

    Is God not satisfied with the finished work of Jesus Christ? Is God not satisfied with His Son’s propitiation for the sins of the whole world? Is God is not satisfied with Christ’s atoning work?

    Of course God is satisfied. So, why does LS add what man must bring to God for salvation when Jesus paid it all?

    Lordship Salvation is a corruption of “the simplicity that is in Christ.” Lordship Salvation is a man-centered, non-saving message that is antithetical to the biblical plan of salvation. Lordship Salvation frustrates grace (Gal. 2:21).

    LM
     
    #36 Lou Martuneac, Aug 13, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 13, 2008
  17. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    Lou,

    Why are you ignoring my replies to you? My understanding is that the BB is a discussion forum. If you have a reason for ignoring, so be it. Otherwise, what your doing looks like your proselytizing.
     
  18. Lou Martuneac

    Lou Martuneac New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks, what LS men are teaching has always and ONLY been my concern. I will continue to defend what I believe is JM being a geuine, born again Christian. He has simply lost his balance on the theology of the Gospel. A serious loss of balance.


    LM
     
  19. Lou Martuneac

    Lou Martuneac New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    0
    When you or any man dodges the obvious meaning and intent of questions I put to them, they, in this case, you lose the privilege to expect me to interact with you on your terms.


    LM
     
  20. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    I beg your pardon sir, but I answered your question pointedly and directly. Perhaps you didn't like the response or it wasn't to your liking, but I re-phrased your question (making it personal to me), gave it a straightforward answer, and then added some comment. You insist on this false accusation, which I call you out publically on. You have sinned against me in this manner.
     
Loading...