1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What Happend to Faith and Trust in the Bible?

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by mjwegs42, Sep 7, 2004.

  1. David J

    David J New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    0
    All I can add is that no English translation meets the "one true form" of God's preserved word since our bible is a translation.

    None of the following bibles would qualify(just an example):

    KJV: currently in use today- 1611, 1762, 1769,1873,NKJV, KJ21, and TMB.
    NASB: currently in use- 1977 and 1995
    Geneva Bible: 1560, 1599
    etc...

    What is amazing is that all of the above translations have God's Holy Word complete and every teaching and doctrine is in each faithful translation. So, yes we do have the preserved Word of God!

    Also God preserved His Word so that it will speak to every generation. That is the joy of having the living Word in that it will never die to one version in one time frame.

    Just my thoughts....
     
  2. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    mjwegs42 asked:

    1. God has promised he would preserve his word. Why do we/you limit him?

    No one is claiming god has not preserved his word.

    2. Why can we not accept one true form of Gods preserved word?

    Why should we accept "one true form" of God's preserved word? I believe in a God who is powerful to preserve his words even through a few human errors in translation.

    Who's limiting God here?

    3. Why, if you have Faith in God (which means in everything) do you use multiple versions of Gods word. Would this not mean you are Faithless in his preservation?

    No, I have more faith in God's preservation of his word than any KJV-onlyists, because I believe God has preserved it in a lot more places than they are willing to give him credit.
     
  3. mjwegs42

    mjwegs42 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    Before any more arguments file in, I would like everyone to veiw russell55's reply. Notice he speaks his heart on the matter. He does not accuse me of being a KJVO. He simple answers the questions with where he is in his spiritual walk with Christ. I simply like to see where people are in the walk with the Lord! Lets not forget, this whole section is about Bible Versions/Translations.

    Thanks for the great reply russell55! God Bless.

    Mike
     
  4. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    In that case I can answer the title question simply.

    Nothing
     
  5. Craigbythesea

    Craigbythesea Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    5,535
    Likes Received:
    21
    Psalm 12:5. "Because of the devastation of the afflicted, because of the groaning of the needy, Now I will arise," says the LORD; "I will set him in the safety for which he longs."
    6. The words of the LORD are pure words; As silver tried in a furnace on the earth, refined seven times.
    7. You, O LORD, will keep them; You will preserve him from this generation forever.
    8. The wicked strut about on every side When vileness is exalted among the sons of men.

    David wrote this, a Psalm of worship in which he says that God will preserve His people, and that they can depend upon that because the “words of the LORD are pure words; As silver tried in a furnace on the earth, refined seven times.”

    David also wrote Psalm 91,

    7. A thousand may fall at your side And ten thousand at your right hand, But it shall not approach you.

    These are NOT prophesies, they are expressions of worship. I do not limit God in His ability to receive worship.

    We do not have the original manuscripts of the Bible in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. And even if we did, only a tiny portion of the world’s population is fluent in all three of these languages. Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek are all very different from English and it is IMPOSSIBLE to translate these languages into English without both loosing information and adding information. And because the translating of languages is a subjective rather than exclusively an objective discipline, it is not reasonable to expect everyone to agree on any particular translation of any particular portion of the Bible.

    I use many different translations of the Bible to assist me in understanding the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts of Scripture. This has absolutely nothing to do with Psalm 12. The fact is that the writings which make up our Bible have not been perfectly preserved in Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek, and they are VERY MUCH LESS PRESERVED IN ANY ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE.

    Had God promised to perfectly preserve the writings which make up our Bible, He would have kept his promise. But He made NO SUCH PROMISE, and to claim that he did make such a promise, when such a promise has not been kept, would make God the liar of all liars, and that is A SIGNIFICANT PART OF THE MISSION OF THE KJO SECT. Some of them may be naïve and not realize the nature of the mission upon which the powers of darkness have sent them, but nonetheless that is the mission upon which they have embarked.

    I find it most regrettable that there are those “Christians” who choose to believe the lies of sinful men rather than the true words of our holy God. But once they have made that fatal choice, as much as we may try, we find it to be nearly impossible to rescue them.

    Note: All Scriptures are from the NASB, 1995, the most accurate translation of the Bible that I have available to me.
     
  6. superdave

    superdave New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    2,055
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe that God inspired his word, and I can study it today.
     
  7. Michael52

    Michael52 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    360
    Likes Received:
    0
    I trust the Bible reveals the One true God in which I place my faith. Of the two, the Bible and God, it is only God which is absolutely needful for me to have the original!
     
  8. Orvie

    Orvie New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    Messages:
    649
    Likes Received:
    0
    It seems like all of us believe that God has preserved His Word, however, some have it pickled in the KJV:kjb1769 :eek:
     
  9. mioque

    mioque New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    0
    Some serious answers.

    "1. God has promised he would preserve his word. Why do we/you limit him?"
    "'
    I believe God's promise.

    "2. Why can we not accept one true form of Gods preserved word?"
    ""
    Don't worry I do accept one true form of Gods preserved word.

    "3. Why, if you have Faith in God (which means in everything) do you use multiple versions of Gods word. Would this not mean you are Faithless in his preservation?"
    ""
    Because I read the Bible in translation instead of using an original language version.
     
  10. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    I have faith in God, and using different versions does not affect my faith because they all have the same message. If I did not have the same faith now I had to trust Christ, I would not be here; I would still be practicing astrology and Buddhist meditation.

    I think this may be my 1,000th post, or close! ;)
     
  11. Trotter

    Trotter <img src =/6412.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    4,818
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You tagged it right the first time, Roger.

    Although the questions could be thought provoking, they are worded so as to call the faith of anyone not holding to 'One-Version-Onlyism' into doubt.

    Same ole, same ole...just a different screen name.

    In Christ,
    Trotter
     
  12. mjwegs42

    mjwegs42 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trotter, you are completely wrong, as is Roger! I question no-ones faith. And I did not make any 'One-Version-Onlyism' remarks. I simply asked a few questions about the Bible. Try not to be so defensive.
     
  13. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, you did. You asked, "why can we not accept one true form of Gods preserved word[?]". If you were not referring to a single translation (regardless of which translation that might be), then what were you referring to? It's entirely possible I'm reading your remark incorrectly.
     
  14. mjwegs42

    mjwegs42 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am asking, "why can we not accept one true form of Gods preserved word[?]". Not stating, there is a difference. That is why I put "we"!
     
  15. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the clarification. In my answer, I had previously stated that there is no scriptural requirement for needing as a whole to accept only one sole translation for everyone. It's not a matter of "why can we not", and more a matter of "are we required to". Scripturally, we are not required to. Hence, I don't. The only thing I am dopctrinal on is that there is one true scriptural message. That scriptural truth is perfect, ans is typically so regardless of the translation in which it is found.
     
  16. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, Sister GrannyGumbo -- Preach it! [​IMG] Sister Michelle does indeed
    refresh my bowels.

    Iƒaiah LIX.21 (KJV1611):

    As for me, this is my couenant
    with them, saith the LORD: My spirit
    that is vpon thee, and my words
    which I haue put in thy mouth, shall
    not depart out of thy mouth, nor out
    of the mouth of the seede, nor out of
    the mouth of thy seedes seed, saith the
    LORD, from henceforth, and for euer.

    Isaiah 59:21 (The Message)
    "As for me," God says, "this is my covenant with them: My Spirit that I've placed upon you and the words that I've given you to speak, they're not going to leave your mouths nor the mouths of your children nor the mouths of your grandchildren. You will keep repeating these words and won't ever stop." God's orders.

    Notice how the KJV speaks of "the seede"
    which is of course, our Lord and Savior
    Messiah Jesus. By contrast the Modern Version
    speaks of "your children". What a watering
    down of the message; what a major change
    of doctrine, that the words of our children
    are what save us and not the words of
    our wonderful Savior: Messiah Iesus.

    [​IMG] Praise Iesus, Sonne of God [​IMG]
     
  17. mjwegs42

    mjwegs42 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ed,

    Help me here. My KJV says:

    Isiah 59:21 As for me, this is my covenant with them, saith the LORD; My spirit that is upon thee, and my words which I have put in thy mouth, shall not depart out of thy mouth, nor out of the mouth of thy seed, nor out of the mouth of thy seed's seed, saith the LORD, from henceforth and for ever.

    Where did you get "seede" from?

    Mike
     
  18. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,362
    Likes Received:
    668
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Ed was quoting from the AV 1611, the REAL KJV. His quote is accurate to the spelling in the AV.

    Buying a replica AV 1611 is the best-spent $30 or so that a serious English-using Bible student can make!

    (Or, if ya have a $ million or two laying around, you can buy a pristine genuine copy online at any of several antique books auctions!)
     
  19. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    I got it from the Real
    King James Version AKA: KJV1611 edition.
    Pray tell which Bible did you get your
    words from?

    BTW, my King James Versions is PERFECT,
    errorless, inerrant and contains the
    true written word of God. IF there is
    ANY DIFFERENCE, however slight,
    it means your Bible has been corrupted.
    According to Chick Comics, this is due
    to a Roman Catholic conspirasy to
    be meddling with our Bible.

    The KJV1611
    edition i have is the original King James
    Version (well as original as we
    can get it, I think this is the 3rd
    printing, the first two printings
    apparently are not available anymore).
    This is the version actually AUTHORIZED
    by King James. The KJV1769 edition most
    KJVOs use could not have been authorized
    by King James as he was dead long
    before 1769.

    [​IMG] Praise Iesus! [​IMG]
     
  20. michelle

    michelle New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    3,217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry Ed, they say the same thing, same word.

    Today we spell it seed. Then they spelled it seede. Please give reason why verses are omitted from the mv's?


    love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
    michelle
     
Loading...